Titanfall Team Decides Against Single-Player Campaign

Gizen

New member
Nov 17, 2009
279
0
0
So, I find this news to actually be kind of hilarious.

Here, Titanfall was looking to be the one and only Xbox One exclusive title that was actually good, that actually had the potential to move units and sell Xbones all by itself... And it just pissed that all down the drain. I don't know, maybe something will change between now and when the Xbone launches in a few months, but my personal experience working at a game store is that online-multiplayer-only console games do not sell. At least, not for very long. We have massive piles of copies of Socom Confrontation, MAG, Shadowrun and Warhawk that we can not get rid of for longer than a day. People come in, want to buy them, and then return them, frequently mere hours later, after realizing that the game has no offline mode for them. We could not move these games if we were giving them away. Because we HAVE. We've given out copies of some of these games away for free, and people still don't want it.

Mind you, I'm certain Titanfall will sell better than all those games. For starters, it'll likely be higher quality than all of them, so that'll help, but the number of people who don't have a good enough internet connection to be able to play, or just aren't interested in multiplayer (which, for FPS games especially, has a bad reputation for attracting obnoxious 12 year olds) is not to be underestimated. Combined with the still lackluster enthusiasm for the Xbone in general as well as its higher price tag, and I suddenly see a lot of anticipation and desire for this game dropping off.

And what makes this so ironic to me is that it's being done by Respawn, aka, the guys who made the two GOOD Call of Duty games. I don't actually have any friends who like playing CoD multiplayer. Hell, as a whole, most of my friends detest the entire CoD franchise, BUT, they all make exceptions for Modern Warfare 1 and 2's single player campaign.
 

dragongit

New member
Feb 22, 2011
1,075
0
0
It's probably what most people would buy the game for anyway. Saves them money to not develope a story and make cutscenes. I'm still not getting an Xbone, but if when it comes to the PC I'll be ready.
 

Broken Blade

New member
Nov 29, 2007
348
0
0
I respect them for making that call. Unfortunately, it also kills most of my interest in this game. :\
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
That makes sense. If you don't want to make a single player mode don't, make your multiplayer mode better.

Shortens your games life expectancy though but it works for TF2 so it could work with other games, provided it gets plenty of support.
 

CriticalMiss

New member
Jan 18, 2013
2,024
0
0
Between this and Wolfenstein it seems like developers are finally re-learning that you don't need multiplayer AND singleplayer in your game. Maybe if it catches on they will stop spending so much money to develop their games? Also, he could have probably used more tact. Blaming it on the gamers seems a little shitty of him especially considering that most people probably didn't finish the single player campaign because it was crap.
 

jericu

New member
Oct 22, 2008
152
0
0
To be fair, the games these guys make actually are known more for their multiplayer than their singleplayer. If it means refocusing on what they feel is important, then power to them quite frankly.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
Seems perfectly reasonable to me, just look at Halo and what it did for the previous Xbox's because of its multiplayer.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
I was all ready to be pissed about this, and call this guy a twat.

But its an FPS with a 'strong multi player' focus, so this is probably for the best. Better no single player then a shit one that holds the game back, and naturally the reverse.
 

neppakyo

New member
Apr 3, 2011
238
0
0
Welp, that scratches that game off my list for the PC.

Fucking tired of multiplayer games, and half assed single player. GIVE ME MORE DEEP IN-DEPTH SINGLE PLAYER GAMES DAMMIT!
 

teh_Canape

New member
May 18, 2010
2,665
0
0
ZZoMBiE13 said:
Well I won't lie, that is disappointing. Seems like such an interesting world to tell a story in.

But I can't say it's a big surprise. And since Halo has kinda fallen out of favor with me, I've been wanting a new shooter for the occasions when I feel like some online multiplayer. I'll still keep an eye on Titanfall.
who knows, maybe if it does well enough they might put out a sequel or something of the sort that is singleplayer, or at least a spinoff
here's hoping at least
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
RogueportJack said:
I actually respect them for this. If you're going for a quality multiplayer experience, you may as well focus on that. If they don't want to shoehorn a campaign in then they shouldn't, especially when the reverse happens so often.
I agree their good for making a choice of what their game is and sticking with it, but their also dicks for saying SP is useless and no-one plays them. Personally SP games are some of my favorite ones and last the longest (if their good), MP ones are often short lived.
 

piinyouri

New member
Mar 18, 2012
2,708
0
0
That hurts my heart.

"Single player isn't popular enough to justify the costs"

Ow.

I haven't been following this game at all though, so really have no idea what it's about, but if it's going to be a competitor to Call of Duty and other competitive online games then can understand the decision and respect it.
 

Grabehn

New member
Sep 22, 2012
630
0
0
So... One game less to keep an eye on. I like that they want to focus on one aspect of the game instead of having a shit single player like BF3 did, but I'll never buy a multiplayer only game. I miss when the sp and mp were good thou, like CoD's enemy at the gates look alike for the Russian campaign, or Modern Warfare's. Those were pretty good and the MP was pretty fun too.
 

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,104
0
0
Well, we go on all the time about half-assed multiplayer in singleplayers games, I think it's good that they stick to their strengths. If they don't even think it's worthwhile making, somehow I doubt it would have been that inspired anyway.
 

zidine100

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,016
0
0
so new players have no way to get adjusted to your games main focus bar jumping into random matches and having to listen to a bunch of whiners calling then noobs, GREAT PLAN GUYS!
 

crimson sickle2

New member
Sep 30, 2009
568
0
0
I'm a little disappointed because a good campaign can add a lot even to a FPS game, but ultimately it's their decision. As long as there is some sort of tutorial or practice matches available and the rest of the game is good, then I agree with the decision.
 

Anathrax

New member
Jan 14, 2013
465
0
0
Wohoo! We cut out the crappy, "cinematic", cutscene laden explosions everyone I'm so macho MURICA single player in what is supposed to be a multiplayer focus title. Now if only Batolfeel and Collar Duty would do the same.

Edit: Because let's face it, "Wouldn't justify the costs"? It would be a Micheal Bay film*Infinity
 

SweetWarmIce

New member
Jun 1, 2009
108
0
0
As much as I love single player campaigns they're usually not that great when the focus is multiplayer. A tutorial and bots should be enough for learning.
 

roguewriter

New member
May 9, 2011
73
0
0
Right. Smart move. Saves me the trouble of being excited for this game. Scratch that off my list and (*bleep*) you very much.
 

AyaReiko

New member
Aug 9, 2008
354
0
0
piinyouri said:
That hurts my heart.

"Single player isn't popular enough to justify the costs"

Ow.
I guess Bioshock Infinite was just small time then.

Wasn't really interested in the first place, but this just cements this game as a "no buy" from me.