Title Change: Rape by Fraud?

Recommended Videos

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
Edit: Okay, since everyone seems to be misunderstanding the point of this post, here's what I meant. I don't care about the show/comic themselves, just about the issue in the law they raise. I wanted to discuss the law itself, and whether rape by fraud should really be delineated based on whether the reason the woman (or man) is having sex is "good" in the eyes of the law. That's it. Nothing else. I don't care that it's just entertainment. Focus on the law, and use the shows as possible (and entirely hypothetical) examples of what would count as rape under this standard.

I know, that's a pretty scandalous, and inflammatory, thread title. It's also, surprisingly, accurate. First, here's the situation.

At the end of the episode "As Fast As She Can" (Season 4 Episode 23) Barney describes his latest scheme to sleep with a woman:

"I'm going to an amnesia ward with a bunch of photos of my 'children' and a wedding ring. I'm going to find the hottest patient/my wife, and we're going to-" at which point he's interrupted.

"What's the issue?" I hear you asking. "Barney Stinson is known for using deception as a strategy for sleeping with women. He's claimed to be an astronaut, claimed to have lots of money, to be a war hero, what does it matter that he claims to be a woman's husband, the father of her children?"

Well, the issue, dear reader, is that none of those other deceptions are rape. Deceiving a woman into believing you're her husband is. The law draws a rather nuanced line between what counts as "rape" when a woman is being deceived, and it largely depends on the motivation behind the sex.

Basically, the law views sleeping with ones husband or boyfriend as a "good motive" for sexual activity, and thus protects it from possible exploitation. The law views sleeping with someone because he's an astronaut (or she's wearing a push-up bra) as "bad motive", and thus doesn't protect it. The law actually determines that some sex is worthwhile, and other sex isn't.

A similar thing happened in the Spiderman comic books. A super-villain changed his physical appearances (through his powers) to appear to be Peter Parker and slept with his roommate. This, too, is rape. If the woman is consenting for what the law considers a good reason (a pre-existing relationship, love, ect.) it's protected from deceit. If the woman is consenting for what the law considers a bad reason (money, power, physical looks, ect), you can lie as much as you like to get a woman in bed and it's not rape.

I thought this was interesting, and wanted to see if I could spark some discussion on the issue. Please no flaming about either "evil men who lie" or "stupid women who sleep around just 'cause someone claims to be a cop". So, here's the question:

Is the law right?

Edit: Also, mods, please don't take down this thread just because it's controversial. I'm not meaning to defend or attack the show/comic themselves, they just raise an interesting point about the law.
 

EchetusXe

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,046
0
0
'Rape on How I Met Your Mother'

That Sir, is am amazing thread title.

It conjures images of a comedy show where a nervous audience watch a child explaining that they were the product of a rape. Kinda like a Ctrl+Alt+Delete comic but on national television.

Anyway, throw that (fictional) scumbag in jail.
 

Bediz

New member
Apr 20, 2009
124
0
0
If this discussion is to be held, then it benefits all to have the dictionary definition of "rape":

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rape
Rape - unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent

Amnesia patients are certainly incapable of valid consent as they suffer a mental deficiency. Given that, the circumstances presented definitely qualify as rape.

That, however, doesn't seem to be your primary point. What I gather is that you are claiming deception = rape and that is a very thin line. Countless times in daily human life, you have men and women lying to get laid. Spouses take off their wedding band to have an affair, fake ids are used to get into clubs, "I'm pulling down about ${more than is actually made}", the list is endless. To claim that anything other than oath-sworn truth automatically equals rape is ludicrous. I wonder how actual rape/molestation victims feel about people crying rape under such circumstances. It is very hard for me to imagine that one who has been forceably violated could even yield a response to another who claims to share pain because he/she thought that their sexual partner made more/was more famous/held a higher position/etc.
 

Gildan Bladeborn

New member
Aug 11, 2009
3,044
0
0
This post reminded me of something, and then it clicked: that's pretty much the plot of the film Overboard [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093693/] starring Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn, if you take away the bit about a 'random' amnesiac and add 'take care of my kids' to the list of things pretending to be her husband was supposed to get him.
 

David_G

New member
Aug 25, 2009
1,133
0
0
Yep, that might be illegal, but it's heavily implied in various points in the show, that his work is illegal. But him using stories to sleep with women, is just used to develop his character, make him look like a heartless asshole, so it's more surprising when he falls in love.
 

Nimbus

Token Irish Guy
Oct 22, 2008
2,162
0
0
You say that 'the' law says this, or 'the' law determines that. Which law, exactly? American law?
 

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
Bediz said:
If this discussion is to be held, then it benefits all to have the dictionary definition of "rape":

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rape
Rape - unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent

Amnesia patients are certainly incapable of valid consent as they suffer a mental deficiency. Given that, the circumstances presented definitely qualify as rape.

That, however, doesn't seem to be your primary point. What I gather is that you are claiming deception = rape and that is a very thin line. Countless times in daily human life, you have men and women lying to get laid. Spouses take off their wedding band to have an affair, fake ids are used to get into clubs, "I'm pulling down about ${more than is actually made}", the list is endless. To claim that anything other than oath-sworn truth automatically equals rape is ludicrous. I wonder how actual rape/molestation victims feel about people crying rape under such circumstances. It is very hard for me to imagine that one who has been forceably violated could even yield a response to another who claims to share pain because he/she thought that their sexual partner made more/was more famous/held a higher position/etc.
You... Uh... Didn't actually read my post, did you? I specifically explained that the nuance I'm talking about in the law is the difference between acceptable deception of the "I'm really a New York Yankee" type, and rape-charge-worthy deception of the "I'm your husband/boyfriend".

Seriously, I actually have right there in the post that it's not just "[t]o claim that anything other than oath-sworn truth automatically equals rape", it's actually quite the opposite. It's not rape to deceive a woman if the factor influencing her decision to sleep with you is in and of itself not a righteous motivation.

To reiterate: if you deceive a woman, and the woman has "good motive" to sleep with you, it's rape. If you deceive a woman and she doesn't have good motive, it's not. Being a woman's husband is good motive. The car you drive, physical good looks, job, amount of money, ect. is not good motive.

I get the feeling that you read the title, and just responded to what you figured I must have written about, instead of the specific instances I actually wrote about.

TheNamlessGuy said:
But it would be legen- wait for it- DARY!
Sorry, I had to

OT: I thought rape was when you forced someone to sleep with you, through violence...
Oh well, what do I know
Any time someone gives consent under duress (which is, basically, under strain) it can be rape. Any time the woman is not mentally capable of giving consent, it can be rape. And, if you deceive a woman about something the law considers a good reason to have sex, it's rape.

Nimbus said:
You say that 'the' law says this, or 'the' law determines that. Which law, exactly? American law?
Sorry, I meant American law. Most specifically, the law of Colorado, but it's not varied much across state lines. Sorry, I didn't remember that we have international posters.
 

Zorg Machine

New member
Jul 28, 2008
1,304
0
0
firstly Barney Stinson could use magic to get away from crimes (though it doesn't work on parking tickets) so law doesn't apply to him.
OT: Are you saying that a super villain used face changing technology to get laid? note the term "Super Villain" I think that it's not that weird for him to commit a crime. and secondly, Barney Stinson is a man who on a daily basis, has meetings and signs contract that could start WW3 and apparently at least half of his company belong in prison.
So apparently you have accused two super criminals of doing things that are against the law...
 

AWC Viper

New member
Jun 12, 2008
1,288
0
0
0.o i alway's liked barney. he was so cool and funny. he made me wear a suit to everything. unlike that dick ted. but now he's a rapist. *throws suit away*
 

Chicago Ted

New member
Jan 13, 2009
3,463
0
0
I'm just going to say this again, but this thread title has to be one of the most eyecatching ones I've seen. Good job on that.
 

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
Chicago Ted said:
I'm just going to say this again, but this thread title has to be one of the most eyecatching ones I've seen. Good job on that.
Thanks, though I'm not getting the level of response I would have liked
 

MR T3D

New member
Feb 21, 2009
1,424
0
0
its a
LEGEND... wait for it... ARY
show and a classic comic. thankfully neither of which can be concieved by lawyers, and both of which are immune to our laws.
its not as big a deal, barney stinson, despite his awsomeness, can't exist IRL, and it should be impossible to fully emmulate him.
and Ted Mosby's alright.
oh, wait, this is a jokes thread, nice.
 

Gladlygoose

New member
Sep 14, 2009
8
0
0
I think most of us can agree that having sex with an amnesiac under deceitful and false pretenses would be considered rape.

The other situation is however more complicated. Because the woman isn't coerced or physically forced to participate, she is simply having sex with someone who she thinks is someone she knows. We could compare this to a twin taking advantage of his/her siblings loved one. If the woman knew who the person was would she still have sex with him? probably not. But then we could say the same for someone who thinks they are having sex with an austronaut.

To conclude I really have no idea if it could be considered rape or not. I think it is morally wrong, but I couldn't tell you if it is unlawful (or if I think it should be).