Treyarch's good. They'll do fine wherever they go with this.
*hopes for middles ages*
Huge battles with swords and shit.
*hopes for middles ages*
Huge battles with swords and shit.
Treyarch Looking for History Buff for Next Call of Duty
- Thread starter John Funk
- Start date
Well, I wouldn't mind the Falklands being immortalised in a video game. The Americans might get a bit huffy about not being involved in it though.
You are obviously not familiar with British/Irish history. You are also clearly an idiot.Sulu said:
The Irish troubles could not be more different to the Taliban/US war.
A game where you, as a British ex-criminal get sent to crush the tiny rebellion of a nation you have abused and oppressed for hundreds of years? Sounds fun.
Next time a country gives the dregs of its society marshall law to burn down your cities, then maybe you'll have a better idea how the British/Irish war was fought in the beginning of this century.
One area I think is inevitable for CoD is the future. But I think Treyarch might as well do their duty of trying out outdo their big brother IW, yet not be too obvious about it. Just like they did with World At War, tried desperately to be edgy like COD4 yet didn't want to be set in modern times.
I'm considering games like MGS3, set in the 1960's yet the game had a lot of fun with cutting edge 60's tech as it did not tie itself down to an actual conflict and was highly hypothetical.
How about instead of WWII, instead of the Cold War, how about World War 3?! I mean the kinds of plans that various military forces dreamt up for "atomic soldiers" in hypothetical wars, where nuclear missiles are lobbed around like conventional artillery shells are lobbed around today.
I'm considering games like MGS3, set in the 1960's yet the game had a lot of fun with cutting edge 60's tech as it did not tie itself down to an actual conflict and was highly hypothetical.
How about instead of WWII, instead of the Cold War, how about World War 3?! I mean the kinds of plans that various military forces dreamt up for "atomic soldiers" in hypothetical wars, where nuclear missiles are lobbed around like conventional artillery shells are lobbed around today.
As long as I get to play Richard Sharpe or Patrick Harper...Virgil said:
On a second note, the perfect Vietnam Game as already been made.... Battlefield: Vietnam...
You could also play it in real time as the real war was over and won within the space of a weekend(Exaggeration).Captain Pancake said:
I'm fairly sure I saw something talking about CoD7 being in 'Nam in PCGamer a few months back...
I'd love it.
I'd love it.
I'm really looking foward to Treyarch's next game.
They might not have the same skill with multi-player as IW, but I had tonnes more fun with the single and co-oprative modes in WAW then I did with COD4.
Plus, they might not abandon their entire PC fanbase like Infinity Ward has shown it is so determined to do.
They might not have the same skill with multi-player as IW, but I had tonnes more fun with the single and co-oprative modes in WAW then I did with COD4.
Plus, they might not abandon their entire PC fanbase like Infinity Ward has shown it is so determined to do.
A Cold War game based around spying and espoinage would be very intresting. Imagine, because no one really won or lost as there wan't any actual conflict, you'd get the views from both sides, and the occasional 'large war of the period' mission. Think about, espoinage as a Russian spy, a Sothern Korean soldier in the Korean War, a 20 year old junky in 'Nam, this has the potensial to be either be the most incredible, or the most horrible game ever.
if this is carefully portrayed then this idea would be amazing (vietnam i mean). But i believe heavy emphasis needs to placed on the reality of the war. A war game veteran like trechyard has enough power to make a very good game, but its still not going to stand up unless they create more things that simply "another shooter". Nazi Zombies in WAW was a good example of innovative ideas. More are going to have to be made if trechyard has a shot at this. I believe they should really remove the whole "glorified hero of war" kind of idea. Ultimate defeat in the single player campaign may just make or break this game if it ever comes to be
Oh wow. I have to quote Linkara here.Gxas said:
We Should Do Something! Should we do something? We should do something! Should we do something? I'M CHANGING! Should we do something? - Linkara
