Treyarch Looking for History Buff for Next Call of Duty
- Thread starter John Funk
- Start date
Also, I'm very proud of this thread for not becoming a Treyarch hate thread full of people who say "WaW sucked, CoD4 iz best gaem evar"
Idk about you guys, but I expect the campaign to be terrible and the multiplayer to be somewhat decent. And since this Vietnam awesome thing seems to be running on the Campaign portion of the game, I expect another generic shooter.
Any other setting brings the same thing to mind, they better be pushing the envelope somehow or else it would just be another not awesome as "Infinity Ward's game" game.
Any other setting brings the same thing to mind, they better be pushing the envelope somehow or else it would just be another not awesome as "Infinity Ward's game" game.
Don't forget the "V1 Rocket" you get when you get 25 kills.crepesack said:
There is a difference between "Huffy" and "No way in a million years".Captain Pancake said:
Unless your an american anyway who infiltrates the British army (Who all will have posh or cockney) and has to fight both sides and wins anyway
Personally I like how CoD4-CoD5 went. I kind of feel that Treyarch is a good company, just not as great as Infinity Ward, and I think it's neat to see them sort of take what Infinity Ward did with their latest title and give it a new feel. CoD5 was quite a bit different than CoD4 but a lot of the main ideas were still there, and I thought it was fresh and exciting while still giving that familiar CoD feel. Now MW2 brings a lot of new features to the table, and I'd like to see Treyarch take another point in history - the Vietnam War is a fine example, and there's a lot more to choose from - and just rework what Infinity Ward did. Give us new kill streaks, show up some new weapons with various advantaged and disadvantages, give us a game that looks new. But, when you get right down to it, have the core of that game still be very, very similar.CantFaketheFunk said:
That isn't to say I don't think or don't want Treyarch to try and be better than Infinity Ward, I just don't see it happening. By all means, if they make a game that is far different from MW2 and it's just as exciting (if not more) then I will love it to bits. I'm just not entirely sure it's worth the risk for Treyarch - as I said, I'd be content with a "Modern Warfare 2.5" of sorts.
Hmm, Call of Duty:40,000? noo, wait, THQ has the rights to make Warhammer games.SharedProphet said:
How about...Call of Duty:You know every single annoying part in the pacific campaign in World at War? well, add double the foliage and trees, and you got the majority of a Vietnam game.
