Bourne said:
She wrote about vampire before? I could have sworn her characters had nothing to do with the established vampire cannon, and were more heavily associated with such genres as "teen magazine" and "future stars of GQ".
Before I say anything else, I would like to make it clear that I strongly dislike Twilight. While I didn't read any of the books, I saw parts of the movie and what I saw made me shiver in utter disgust.
Having said that, I never really understood the criticism that "it violates established vampire cannon". Writers aren't under any obligation to follow how certain creatures were potrayed in past works. While established cannon can serve as a guideline, the author has complete freedom how any beings in his/her universe are depicted. If Meyer describes vampires as beings that glitter in the sunlight, then that is how they are potrayed in the
Twilight universe.
Simply put, there is no "
right" or "
wrong" way to potray a fictional race/creature. How they are potrayed in certain universes is in complete jurisdiction of the author.
EDIT: And this is related: