Good. I want Assassin's Creed to be about unique historic settings. Now let me have my feudal Japan ninja Assassins and revolutionary France.
Why don't they set it in a smaller city or even in a couple of large towns and villages instead? Then you don't need to make such large single maps and won't have skyscrapers everywhere. Then set it in a country which has strict gun control so that you don't need so many ranged weapons. Maybe even set it in some African country that is having a civil war, it's a modern setting but doesn't require crazy modern technology. The conflict is built in and they can bullshit people by saying it's an artistic commentary on yadda yadda yadda. Have Kony as an easter egg character too, since loads of people wouldn't mind stabbing his spleen."There are just too many mechanics we would have to develop to make it believable," says lead writer Darby McDevitt, "vehicles, plausible modern cities, a huge array of ranged weapons, etc."
Yeahcursedseishi said:Essentially what I was going to say, and was even joking about while at work when I read it.
People are bringing up "Watch Dogs" as a modern Assassin's Creed, but Splinter Cell works as well for it. The fact that they claim they couldn't do what any basic open world action game has done since the rather late PS1-PS2/etc era is just utter bull. It's not that they can't do it, they just don't want to put any actual work into it.
You know that for you the game would be extremely hard?Adam Jensen said:Good. I want Assassin's Creed to be about unique historic settings. Now let me have my feudal Japan ninja Assassins and revolutionary France.
Maybe Watchdogs secretely is the modern version of Assassin's Creed.Jandau said:Yes, Ubisoft, it is possible. And it's being made. By YOU! You're just calling it Watch Dogs.
Seriously, this is hilarious. They are pretty much making the game already, or something so close to it that it invalidates the argument. Grated, you might say "Then just play Watch Dogs.", but that's besides the point. People would like a modern AssCreed game for the setting and to perhaps resolve the plot (at least somewhat). But it's not being made, even though Ubisoft is pretty much making it already. And what does this tell us? That Ubisoft would like to milk the AssCreed franchise for at least several more sequels, but can't really come out and say it, so they pussyfoot about with lame excuses...
Actually yes, people are. People liked the fact that his character wasn't loved by all because it shows that he was different. He was naive to the colonists' ways due to little interaction with them, stern because of what happened to his mother and how the colonist had treated him and he wasn't a ladies man. Instead of being just an arrogant guy who gets any girl he wants and basically being a canvas to project yourself on to fulfill a fantasy, Connor was a fully fleshed out and interesting character.Gizmo1990 said:Is anyone really asking for more Connor? A house plant has more life and charisma than he did. He is Blandy Blanderson, captain of the H.M.S Bland.
I second this emotion. Sure I've been a lazy arse and not played any of AC3 yet, let alone powering through AC4 I haven't bought, but... come on now.GoaThief said:Thanks for the spoiler warning.
Such a nice thing to shove in to an article allegedly about the technical reasons why a modern setting Assassin's Creed isn't feasible.
Very unhappy and unimpressed.