ThisX1000LoopyDood said:Hehehe, jailed for trolling.
That judge is obviously awesome.
Succinct isn't the same as low content. I'd still get banzored for life for posting "first" though.vivaldiscool said:Anybody else would be banned for this.The_root_of_all_evil said:Good.
/sarcasm.Pipotchi said:She will be a hit in prison though, a looker like her.
It is a half decent use of the court's time when not provoked. As you even said yourself the other girl kicked in her door beat her up then Emily keeps her in her facebook. Which leads to the girl harrassing her online through facebook. Sorry that is a fail in the sympathy dept. If she had taken reasonable measures to protect herself online and then it happened it would be a different story.ugeine said:wordsmith said:"Hey, there's that girl who's viciously bullied me for the last 4 years... *clicks add*"
Stupid girl...
Aaah, so its the victims fault after all!
This girl has already been found guilty of assaulting the victim in 2005 as she walked home from school, and two years later she was convicted of causing criminal damage after kicking Emily's front door.squid5580 said:What are you smoking? You can't expect people to take measures to protect themselves on the internet. It is so much easier to be stupid then get to waste the court's time and money. You know since they have nothing better to do than worry about what someone puts on your facebook.
I tend to think preventing harrassment and assult is a half decent use of the courts time.
Maybe we should have solved this the American way; just given the victim an assult rifle and let her loose at school?
He makes me think of Yoda for some reason.Neonbob said:Hah!
I like that judge.
He's got a sharp tongue.
And hopefully this brings about some kind of change in that girl.
I thought that as soon as i saw the the pic.Random argument man said:However, I'm not sure about that photo...She looks a bit like Lund from Doomsday Arcade...Or is it me?
I'd hit that, with a crowbar.Dale Cooper said:I'd still nail her...