ZephrC said:
if it ever becomes public that a person was involved in a crime that's even vaguely related to sex they will never have a decent job again in our society. And maybe if it's a 40 year old rapist that's okay, but a couple high school kids? That's fucked up.
but to demonize it more than torture and murder
On these two points, I don't see a problem with sex crimes ruining the lives of the perps, no matter how old they are. There is an alarming rate of sexual abuse committed in that manner, and if some of these idiots have to have their whole futures go up in smoke because of it, then maybe others will learn a lesson from that. Alternatively, we could go eye for an eye...you want your name kept private and your life not ruined, when you get caught, then the victim gets to have you restrained and allowed to violate you in return. How many guys would pass on party rape if they either had to face a choice between forever being publicly known as a sex offender, or facing the same shame by having their victim get to strap them down and force a dildo up their rectums? I don't know too many teenage guys who would be able to get over that. And IMO it would serve them right to get a taste of what they did to the girl.
However, this second point will negate my whole tit for tat option.
Do you think that there are many women out there, who were victims of rape, that would not argue that the lingering shame and vulnerability that many feel makes rape a form of torture?