Universal Plans "Edgy" Weird Science Remake

Earnest Cavalli

New member
Jun 19, 2008
5,352
0
0
Universal Plans "Edgy" Weird Science Remake



Strap a bra to your head, Universal is about to make things weird ... again.

Superficially, 1985's Weird Science was like any other crude teen comedy produced during that era. Its basic plot is pretty simple: Two nerds, who've never gotten laid, try to create the girl of their dreams using only porno mags, Frankenstein references and Hollywood's amazingly poor grasp of how computers work. What set Weird Science apart from movies like Teen Wolf Too however, was its surprisingly talented cast, which included Bill Paxton and Mr. Tony Stark himself, Robert Downey Jr. among others. Plus, the film was written and directed by John Hughes, a man whose name became synonymous with classic teen movies throughout the 80s.

What with everything old being new again in Hollywood, Universal Pictures hopes that it can tap into the vein of nostalgia the Internet constantly generates, burns down, then rebuilds with an upcoming Weird Science remake. According to Deadline, this new version is being created as a collaboration between Universal Pictures and Joel Silvers' Silver Pictures studio. That should be seen as great news, as while Silver has a few large black marks on his Hollywood record - Batman & Robin anyone? - he produced the original Weird Science, and thus should have some solid idea of where this remake should go.

As for that direction, Deadline claims that the new Weird Science will likely be an R-rated, edgy comedy, in the same vein as the recent cinematic 21 Jump Street redux or the endlessly lucrative franchise spawned by The Hangover. So far there's no word on who the producers have in mind for cast or crew, nor any release window for this film.

So, how worried should we be about this? That largely depends on your age. Many of our readers were negative five years old when Weird Science hit theaters, so there's likely to be a number of you who've never seen the original flick. If your only experience of Weird Science to date came from the USA Network sitcom it spawned in the mid-90s, you're severely missing out. Seek out Weird Science if you like other John Hughes movies like Ferris Bueller's Day Off or The Breakfast Club. It lies in that same region of teen comedies that can deftly balance overtly sexual, childish humor with genuine pathos. With Universal hoping to turn the new version into a more edgy adaptation, I worry that the film will lose the elements that made its predecessor a classic. There's likely no one in Hollywood capable of one-upping Hughes, so the best we can really hope for is an inoffensive comedy with the same basic elements of the original Weird Science and whichever comedian/attractive person duo the casting office has decided would have the most mass market appeal.

That is the real problem with this idea. Hollywood has changed immensely in the nearly 30 years since Weird Science debuted. At this point the system is so focus-tested and efficient that it almost entirely snuffs out the sort of individual creative touches that could potentially elevate a Weird Science remake into something really special. We'll reserve judgment until this flick hits theaters, but don't think we're holding our breath in anticipation.

Source: Deadline [http://www.deadline.com/2013/04/weird-science-remake-joel-silver-universal/]

Permalink
 

SecondPrize

New member
Mar 12, 2012
1,436
0
0
Dear Hollywood,
Leave my childhood alone. Also have someone make a three-part Transmetropolitan movie, though it will likely be awful.
Love,
Second
 

GodzillaGuy92

New member
Jul 10, 2012
344
0
0
What is the point of this?

No, Universal, that wasn't meant rhetorically. What's the point? You remake a movie when you either want to improve upon the story told in the original, or deliver the story to an audience that otherwise wouldn't have experienced it. Remaking something like King Kong makes sense for the second reason; a lot of people, tragically, just don't have the patience to put up with black-and-white and stop motion effects. But Weird Science, like the other mentioned John Hughes movies, is effectively timeless. Anyone who might conceivably be interested in the story of Weird Science has either already seen it or can do so at any time they please.

Ah, yes, the point is money. Because who needs artistic integrity when making a piece of art?
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
Please no, just leave it alone. It's fine the way it is now, so why mess with it? If money is the answer then...

Universal, you're drunk.

Go home.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Why edgy? I guess they could go the creepier Frankenstein monster route. But if thats the case then why not just make the movie and not call it Weird Science. Call it something else.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
Honestly, why not? You don't have to watch it. It's for the new generation of nerds.
That's the thing, they're just trying to cash in on Nerds being trendy right now. They can't do Revenge of the Nerds if its cool to be a nerd...and most of the things the protagonists do would be considered sexual assault.

Weird Science is probably one of my favorite teen movies and I just think they're morons if they think they can make an even 30 year old movie more relevant without someone like Hughes. Then again Weird Science is just an 80s retelling of Pygmalion and Galatea isn't it. Why don't they find some other ancient myth and adapt it to the lives of current day teens. That would be more compelling, wouldn't it?

I long ago gave up hope that Hollywood could honor the memory of its greatest triumphs so really this news just induces eye rolling for me.
 

Scribblesense

New member
Jan 30, 2013
169
0
0
Updating this movie doesn't make any sense. Nerds are cool now. Instead of making a woman in his bedroom because he can't get laid, he would be making an iPhone app to autotune cat videos while watching The Big Bang Theory and make millions. Then he'd get laid.

You'd think that Hollywood would realize that nerds are cool now, considering every major film of the past 15 years has been for nerds or made by nerds.

Peter Jackson? Nerd.
Sam Raimi? Nerd.
Avatar? Nerds.
The Avengers? Literally the biggest nerds to ever nerdgasm while nerding a box of nerds.
Mark Zuckerberg? Nerd.
Steve Jobs? Hipster nerd.

But instead we're going to see two socially inept "smart" kids wading through a high school ripped from the 50's who, in reality, would probably be well accepted and well liked instead of ostracized for, what? Knowing how to torrent Game of Thrones? My grandma can do that.

Jesus dinosaur-punching Christ, this movie's going to be a turd.
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
Why don't they just re-release the original to theatres, Pixar seems to be making a decent go of it?
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
Honestly, why not? You don't have to watch it. It's for the new generation of nerds.
this. sometimes i feel like movie/book elitists get a bit too snobby over this stuff.

instead of saying "why?" i always prefer to ask "why not?", i tend to be a much happier person that way.
 

Madman Muntz

New member
Apr 16, 2013
50
0
0
I highly encourage Hollywood to continue along this path of moronic self imposed self destruction. The more they rehash the same stagnant crap, the more people stop giving them money. And since every day it gets easier and cheaper for independent filmmakers to bring us new ideas without the taint of Hollywood's corpulent arrogance, or genericized blandness, its truly a win win situation. The reason being is that for every big money Hollywood train wreck, there are several indy gems made. And I feel that eventually this will lead to the financial collapse of these juggernaut studios. And I for one can't wait to see the day when these corporate crap factories and their toadies such as S.A.G. and D.G.A., are nothing but bitter memories.
 

Corven

Forever Gonzo
Sep 10, 2008
2,022
0
0
wombat_of_war said:
as long as they stay the hell away from the breakfast club all will be well
They couldn't remake the breakfast club even if they wanted to:

OT: Didn't really care for the original movie anyways, won't see this either.

The prevalence of remakes and sequels in the movie space is getting tiresome though.
 

Darth_Payn

New member
Aug 5, 2009
2,868
0
0
Why? Just, why? The original is still around and still funny, I vaguely recall the '90's TV show on USA as a kid (it was on the same night as Duckman, I think) so there's no need to make it "edgy". When comic books are still trying to be "edgy", I facepalm, lament the '90's are over so let's move along, and don't buy them. Great Caesar's Ghost, people, did you see what MTV did with Teen Wolf?!

Scribblesense said:
Jesus dinosaur-punching Christ, this movie's going to be a turd.
I actually want to see that. Maybe that could be one of the indie gems Madman Muntz was talking about.