Yeah but good luck finding Agent 47...Raiyan 1.0 said:Not to worry. Sony's hitmen are going to follow.
On a side note, captcha didn't pop up until I hit post...Inglip hates me >.>
Yeah but good luck finding Agent 47...Raiyan 1.0 said:Not to worry. Sony's hitmen are going to follow.
Yeah...flaming the hard drive works well if you use actual flame. Or so I'm led to believe.Baron Khaine said:Throw it in a microwave and run the hell away?Selvec said:Hahaha, told you he would just flame the HD and run. Yes you can recover data from an HD, but if you no how, you can completely destroy any data on one, beyond recovery. Just that the average computer user doesn't know.
Anyway, dumb move. Ah well.
That's not proof that GeoHot created a PSN account. It's proof that someone in Glen Rock, New Jersey used that PS3 to make a PSN account. I don't see anything here showing who made it. Could have been his mom, a sibling, a friend, some stoner who broke into his house to play PS3 while he was away. Who knows? There's not enough proof to say WHO did it. This combined with what giant douchebags Sony are when it comes to suing people, I still do not believe their claims that he made one.Greg Tito said:Beyond just running off to tropical locales, Sony has proof that Hotz created a PlayStation Network account and therefore agreed to the PSN User Agreement. "Hotz identified four PS3 Systems in his possession," the motion said. "He explained that he had purchased one of these consoles new in February 2010 and provided the serial number for that console. SCEA used that serial number to determine that on February 25, 2010, Hotz purchased the PS3 System at a Gamestop store just miles from his home. CEA's records show that the same PS3 System was used on March 10, 2010 to create a PSN account under the user name 'blickmanic.' The IP address associated with the registration is located in Glen Rock, New Jersey, where Hotz lives."
Don't tell me who I can and cannot support. Assuming what he did is true, I can still support not only his but everyone's right to actually own the products they buy and do what they want with them, and I can stand up and say that he shouldn't be getting sued in the first place.Frank_Sinatra_ said:Okay people you can no longer support GeoHot now that he's pulled this shit. Seriously, tampering with evidence then running away doesn't put you in the best of light.
If they prove that he owns a PS3 he done for. If he owns one, then he has entered in a contract with Sony and breached it. The only real argument that his legal team put forward is a jurisdictional one, by buying a PS3 he has entered into contract with Sony saying all disputes will be handled under California Law. Its already a well established principle of law that parties to a contract can agree to a legal jurisdiction so buy owning a PS3 the only defence argument vanishes.ToastedEngineer said:So geohot continues to be a muppet. Did anyone seriously expect him to win this court case before he fled?
The more interesting story is the length Sonys legal team went to prove he owns a ps3.
Uhm, no. That was never true. It was obvious that he owned a PS3. We all knew that; he couldn't crack one without owning one. But buying a PS3 doesn't mean you have entered into a contract with Sony. It's only signing up for the Playstation Network that does that.albino boo said:If they prove that he owns a PS3 he done for. If he owns one, then he has entered in a contract with Sony and breached it.
This is a common misconception. The OtherOS feature was not removed. You can still use them as cheap super computers. All they have done is make you choose between Linux and PSN because they could no longer guarantee the security of systems with Linux installed. Those with Linux on their PS3 became a threat to the millions of others of PSN users.Deadman Walkin said:Yes, he did something stupid. However Sony taking away the right to use the PS3 however you want (like the military using them as cheap supercomputers) is just sad.
As long as the account was made under his name I doubt it really mattersmjc0961 said:That's not proof that GeoHot created a PSN account. It's proof that someone in Glen Rock, New Jersey used that PS3 to make a PSN account. I don't see anything here showing who made it. Could have been his mom, a sibling, a friend, some stoner who broke into his house to play PS3 while he was away. Who knows? There's not enough proof to say WHO did it. This combined with what giant douchebags Sony are when it comes to suing people, I still do not believe their claims that he made one.Greg Tito said:Beyond just running off to tropical locales, Sony has proof that Hotz created a PlayStation Network account and therefore agreed to the PSN User Agreement. "Hotz identified four PS3 Systems in his possession," the motion said. "He explained that he had purchased one of these consoles new in February 2010 and provided the serial number for that console. SCEA used that serial number to determine that on February 25, 2010, Hotz purchased the PS3 System at a Gamestop store just miles from his home. CEA's records show that the same PS3 System was used on March 10, 2010 to create a PSN account under the user name 'blickmanic.' The IP address associated with the registration is located in Glen Rock, New Jersey, where Hotz lives."
Then I must ask...TheSkaAssassin said:I thought the Escapist would support the rights of gamers.
Yeah he fled, but that's not the point. Sony is still in the wrong.
"Sony has proof that Hotz created a PlayStation Network account and therefore agreed to the PSN User Agreement"
So what? The PSN UA is BS!
I was actually planning on donating for this reason. Glad I didn't, but still. Now EULA's and all that shit will stay the same, at best, and will probably just get more bullshitty.ZombieGenesis said:You know what really sucks?
All the people that backed him not because they wanted to be able to pirate anything, but because of the argument of 'ownership' and companies holding non-existant terms over their products even years after they've been sold. I myself felt very strongly about this issue because of that (even though that technically isn't the exact scenario, but still)
For all the people who donated money so that product developers couldn't 'rent' their items rather than actually selling them... this is a serious shot in the foot.
Used to drink with a bloke who freelanced in forensic data recovery for law enforcement and private investigators and he said 95% of the hard drives he got handed were single reformats with busted up cases... which did absolutely nothing to destroy the data and could easily be restored in less than a day (and that's assuming a full HD platter swap into a working HD).Selvec said:Yes you can recover data from an HD, but if you no how, you can completely destroy any data on one, beyond recovery. Just that the average computer user doesn't know.