UPDATE: PS3 Hacker GeoHot Claims He's on Vacation

DaHero

New member
Jan 10, 2011
789
0
0
Raiyan 1.0 said:
Not to worry. Sony's hitmen are going to follow.
Yeah but good luck finding Agent 47...

On a side note, captcha didn't pop up until I hit post...Inglip hates me >.>
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,156
3,895
118
Baron Khaine said:
Selvec said:
Hahaha, told you he would just flame the HD and run. Yes you can recover data from an HD, but if you no how, you can completely destroy any data on one, beyond recovery. Just that the average computer user doesn't know.

Anyway, dumb move. Ah well.
Throw it in a microwave and run the hell away?
Yeah...flaming the hard drive works well if you use actual flame. Or so I'm led to believe.
 

James Raynor

New member
Sep 3, 2008
683
0
0
So basically this case is between an asshole and a company of assholes, how wonderful. Even though sony's in the wrong here, geohot's is essentally comitting suicide as far as people are concerned.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
Greg Tito said:
Beyond just running off to tropical locales, Sony has proof that Hotz created a PlayStation Network account and therefore agreed to the PSN User Agreement. "Hotz identified four PS3 Systems in his possession," the motion said. "He explained that he had purchased one of these consoles new in February 2010 and provided the serial number for that console. SCEA used that serial number to determine that on February 25, 2010, Hotz purchased the PS3 System at a Gamestop store just miles from his home. CEA's records show that the same PS3 System was used on March 10, 2010 to create a PSN account under the user name 'blickmanic.' The IP address associated with the registration is located in Glen Rock, New Jersey, where Hotz lives."
That's not proof that GeoHot created a PSN account. It's proof that someone in Glen Rock, New Jersey used that PS3 to make a PSN account. I don't see anything here showing who made it. Could have been his mom, a sibling, a friend, some stoner who broke into his house to play PS3 while he was away. Who knows? There's not enough proof to say WHO did it. This combined with what giant douchebags Sony are when it comes to suing people, I still do not believe their claims that he made one.

Also, did he really run away? The only thing I see in the article is that Sony claims he went to South America. Not very credible at all, I'd like another source that isn't deriving their information from Sony's claim before I believe that one too.

Frank_Sinatra_ said:
Okay people you can no longer support GeoHot now that he's pulled this shit. Seriously, tampering with evidence then running away doesn't put you in the best of light.
Don't tell me who I can and cannot support. Assuming what he did is true, I can still support not only his but everyone's right to actually own the products they buy and do what they want with them, and I can stand up and say that he shouldn't be getting sued in the first place.
I would just add that he SHOULD be charged with the tampering with evidence and fleeing, if he indeed did so. But again, that all seems to be coming from Sony, so I'm taking it with a pillar of salt considering how scummy they are. They could just be trying to sue him into oblivion like they did to Lik Sang. Plus they started this whole mess by removing an advertised feature and forcing customers to pick which one of two advertised features they were willing to give up (either keep Install Other OS or keep PSN access).

No, I don't think my thoughts on the actual lawsuit have changed at all: Sony is still a massive asshole that I would like to see lose this case handily. It's just these new actions that I would not support, assuming they are true.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
ToastedEngineer said:
So geohot continues to be a muppet. Did anyone seriously expect him to win this court case before he fled?

The more interesting story is the length Sonys legal team went to prove he owns a ps3.
If they prove that he owns a PS3 he done for. If he owns one, then he has entered in a contract with Sony and breached it. The only real argument that his legal team put forward is a jurisdictional one, by buying a PS3 he has entered into contract with Sony saying all disputes will be handled under California Law. Its already a well established principle of law that parties to a contract can agree to a legal jurisdiction so buy owning a PS3 the only defence argument vanishes.
 

Daymo

And how much is this Pub Club?
May 18, 2008
694
0
0
Wow that picture makes him look like an everday youtube idiot. His actions suggest that he goes beyond this though.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
albino boo said:
If they prove that he owns a PS3 he done for. If he owns one, then he has entered in a contract with Sony and breached it.
Uhm, no. That was never true. It was obvious that he owned a PS3. We all knew that; he couldn't crack one without owning one. But buying a PS3 doesn't mean you have entered into a contract with Sony. It's only signing up for the Playstation Network that does that.

And as Sony still hasn't sufficiently proven that he has done so (only that SOMEONE used one of his PS3s to create one; they have yet to provide proof who that SOMEONE is, so at this point it's only an assumption that it's his), he didn't do anything wrong on that front.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
I still support him on the grounds that I don't believe what he did should even be illegal in the first place.
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
*Eyeroll* Well I was sorta hoping something useful would come of this, like changes in consumer law that prevent the manufacturer from telling you how to use hardware that you paid for cause they don't like it. But, that's sorta gone out the window now that this guy has just screwed over everyone.

Oh well, on we go to the brave new world where companies have unfettered rights to tell us how to use the products we've purchased. Score one for our corporate overlords!
 

coldfrog

Can you feel around inside?
Dec 22, 2008
1,320
0
0
So disappointed. The worst part is, Sony's official position on the PS3 is still questionable, but this is really going to hurt anyone who wants to fight back against Sony's policies. What a jackass.
 

erbkaiser

Romanorum Imperator
Jun 20, 2009
1,137
0
0
Good. Nail his ass... he's just a little black hat cracker. Hope his supporters will now see what an ffing douche he really is.

Hacking his own PS3 = fine (srew the DMCA)
Posting the root security keys publicly just to screw with Sony = crime.
 

Grickit

New member
Mar 2, 2011
52
0
0
Deadman Walkin said:
Yes, he did something stupid. However Sony taking away the right to use the PS3 however you want (like the military using them as cheap supercomputers) is just sad.
This is a common misconception. The OtherOS feature was not removed. You can still use them as cheap super computers. All they have done is make you choose between Linux and PSN because they could no longer guarantee the security of systems with Linux installed. Those with Linux on their PS3 became a threat to the millions of others of PSN users.

The military *STILL CAN AND STILL DOES* use PS3s for cheap processing power. They don't need PSN. All the colleges out there using clustered PS3s for computing? They don't need PSN. [Insert all other groups using clustered PS3s for number crunching] don't need PSN either.

People who have a PS3 to play games? They don't need Linux. They have computers for that. Since they game on PS3 there's certainly no more reason for them to stay on insecure and buggy operating systems like Windows and Mac.

So again: Sony did NOT remove the option to install Linux. They just make you choose between playing online (where you'd be a constant risk to other PSN users) and having Linux. And that certainly didn't affect the groups (U.S. Military, Universities, et cetera) who were legitimately using OtherOS.

Find a new argument. Your current one is very flawed, and you're only spreading misinformation.
 

Soveru

New member
Jul 12, 2010
103
0
0
mjc0961 said:
Greg Tito said:
Beyond just running off to tropical locales, Sony has proof that Hotz created a PlayStation Network account and therefore agreed to the PSN User Agreement. "Hotz identified four PS3 Systems in his possession," the motion said. "He explained that he had purchased one of these consoles new in February 2010 and provided the serial number for that console. SCEA used that serial number to determine that on February 25, 2010, Hotz purchased the PS3 System at a Gamestop store just miles from his home. CEA's records show that the same PS3 System was used on March 10, 2010 to create a PSN account under the user name 'blickmanic.' The IP address associated with the registration is located in Glen Rock, New Jersey, where Hotz lives."
That's not proof that GeoHot created a PSN account. It's proof that someone in Glen Rock, New Jersey used that PS3 to make a PSN account. I don't see anything here showing who made it. Could have been his mom, a sibling, a friend, some stoner who broke into his house to play PS3 while he was away. Who knows? There's not enough proof to say WHO did it. This combined with what giant douchebags Sony are when it comes to suing people, I still do not believe their claims that he made one.
As long as the account was made under his name I doubt it really matters
 

tsb247

New member
Mar 6, 2009
1,783
0
0
TheSkaAssassin said:
I thought the Escapist would support the rights of gamers.
Yeah he fled, but that's not the point. Sony is still in the wrong.

"Sony has proof that Hotz created a PlayStation Network account and therefore agreed to the PSN User Agreement"
So what? The PSN UA is BS!
Then I must ask...

HOW is Sony in the wrong?
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
He did the correct thing. An individual can't get justice in our corporate owned legal system. Sony has infinite money, they can just drag the case out indefinitely until he can't pay his lawyers anymore. Then they make you agree to damages you can't possibly pay, or settlement conditions you can't possibly keep such as never using a computer.

Then if you fail to live up to the judgment terms that is a contempt charge which is a criminal offense. So in effect Sony can put YOU or the people you care about in prison for pissing them of. If you think this is an acceptable outcome of modern society then you are a part of the problem.

Just look at the complaint, if you take out the unjust charges that the DMCA allows then there is nothing substantial left.

And if you are one of the few abominable people who think the DMCA is a good think check this out and maybe it will knock some sense into that thick skull: https://www.eff.org/wp/unintended-consequences-under-dmca

In my opinion a corporation should have to go before a judge and prove documented economic damages before it can take any action against an individual.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
ZombieGenesis said:
You know what really sucks?
All the people that backed him not because they wanted to be able to pirate anything, but because of the argument of 'ownership' and companies holding non-existant terms over their products even years after they've been sold. I myself felt very strongly about this issue because of that (even though that technically isn't the exact scenario, but still)

For all the people who donated money so that product developers couldn't 'rent' their items rather than actually selling them... this is a serious shot in the foot.
I was actually planning on donating for this reason. Glad I didn't, but still. Now EULA's and all that shit will stay the same, at best, and will probably just get more bullshitty.

Fuck you, GeoHot. You douche.
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
Selvec said:
Yes you can recover data from an HD, but if you no how, you can completely destroy any data on one, beyond recovery. Just that the average computer user doesn't know.
Used to drink with a bloke who freelanced in forensic data recovery for law enforcement and private investigators and he said 95% of the hard drives he got handed were single reformats with busted up cases... which did absolutely nothing to destroy the data and could easily be restored in less than a day (and that's assuming a full HD platter swap into a working HD).

Magnets aren't too bad but they have a tendency to leave big chunks of artifact data.

We experimented with ways to destroy data beyond his ability to recover it and came up with a few good ones, including one that reinforced my belief that there isn't a problem that can't be solved with detcord.
 
Jan 27, 2011
3,740
0
0
I guess you could say that all that donated money...
*puts on sunglasses*
Just went south.


Ok, more seriously, This guy is now officially a grade A douchebag. As much as I hate rooting for Sony (and big companies in general), I hope they catch him and make him pay through the nose.