As I've mentioned elsewhere, a Fallout New Dubai would lack that sense of Americana gone insane that is a defining element of the Fallout games. I'm not sure it's a good idea.Slycne said:Interesting, although Vegas is slowly becoming the World War II setting for cityscapes. Come on videogame developers there are plenty of other interesting locals in the world. Fallout New Dubai anyone?
Dubai was just a throw out to get people thinking about other locales, on closer analysis it probably wouldn't work, but I still feel we have seen Vegas or settings similar to Vegas enough.teh_gunslinger said:As I've mentioned elsewhere, a Fallout New Dubai would lack that sense of Americana gone insane that is a defining element of the Fallout games. I'm not sure it's a good idea.Slycne said:Interesting, although Vegas is slowly becoming the World War II setting for cityscapes. Come on videogame developers there are plenty of other interesting locals in the world. Fallout New Dubai anyone?
Part of the charm of Fallout have been that you move around in, what is clearly American culture, but American culture warped and twisted with a dab of apocalypse. If the game was set in New Dubai or Tokyo or whatever it would probably be a good game, but I'm not sure it would be a Fallout game. In my own case I would be unable to relate properly to the game world and find the proper context. Fallout is, amongst other things, a satire on America and western culture I think, with a hint of humorous melancholy to the 50's. How would that translate to New Dubai. I know little enough about Dubai as it is, but a warped Dubai would be even more strange to me.
That being said, I think Las Vegas is a lame idea. Reno in F2 already did the whole casino/organized crime thing.
I completely agree. I'm not happy about the Vegas thing. Both because it's gotten very much the thing to do lately, but mostly because they already did it. I was only saying that I would prefer to keep it in the states. Perhaps Miami. I would love to see some mutated alligators.Slycne said:Dubai was just a throw out to get people thinking about other locales, on closer analysis it probably wouldn't work, but I still feel we have seen Vegas or settings similar to Vegas enough.teh_gunslinger said:As I've mentioned elsewhere, a Fallout New Dubai would lack that sense of Americana gone insane that is a defining element of the Fallout games. I'm not sure it's a good idea.Slycne said:Interesting, although Vegas is slowly becoming the World War II setting for cityscapes. Come on videogame developers there are plenty of other interesting locals in the world. Fallout New Dubai anyone?
Part of the charm of Fallout have been that you move around in, what is clearly American culture, but American culture warped and twisted with a dab of apocalypse. If the game was set in New Dubai or Tokyo or whatever it would probably be a good game, but I'm not sure it would be a Fallout game. In my own case I would be unable to relate properly to the game world and find the proper context. Fallout is, amongst other things, a satire on America and western culture I think, with a hint of humorous melancholy to the 50's. How would that translate to New Dubai. I know little enough about Dubai as it is, but a warped Dubai would be even more strange to me.
That being said, I think Las Vegas is a lame idea. Reno in F2 already did the whole casino/organized crime thing.
Yeah, KotOR II ended kinda bad, but it wasn't Obsidian's fault; they were rushed by Lucasarts. It's a shame because the gameplay was better, and I love gray morality, so if only they'd been given time it wouldn't be remembered as a disappointment.GyroCaptain said:That's not entirely fair, and most of the review staff of magazines around the world would disagree with you. You can raise the "It's not Fallout" argument, and that would have more credence, but saying it out-and-out sucked would be hard to support.DalekJaas said:I want to it not to suck like fallout 3
Anyway, the last time Obsidian subcontracted something for another developer in the way of a followup it ended in disaster (KotOR II), but Bethesda have much more relaxed timing constraints.
*Smacks Vrikk* Never *Smacks Vrikk* Ever *Smacks Vrikk* Count *Smacks Vrikk* Tactics *Smacks Vrikk* EVER! *Smacks Vrikk*Vrikk said:It'd be really cool if it was in the same perspective as the first three Fallouts (if we count Tactics), but I think it would be a hard sell to gamers who have already experienced Fallout 3. They wouldn't want to go back in time to an older type of gameplay. Granted, I'd still buy it, and I assume a lot of you would too because you aren't as superficial as others can be but it's still probably a pretty big worry.
Also, I hope they don't take the pre-alpha version of Van Burren. If they want to use the little bit of story they already had they should redo it from scratch. It pretty much sucked, so I'm sort of relieved that we never got that game.
Really?Random argument man said:I guess Bethesda wants everyone to be happy.
Maybe they should support all consoles equally then...Random argument man said:I guess Bethesda wants everyone to be happy.