USA TIES ENGLAND!!!!

Recommended Videos

Lost In The Void

When in doubt, curl up and cry
Aug 27, 2008
10,128
0
0
Can't say I expected it. Then again I can never really get into soccer/football, so I don't know what I'm going to watch until the hockey season kicks up again
 

Olikunmissile

New member
Jul 16, 2008
1,094
0
0
USA only scored because Green fumbled the ball. When it came to you guys making proper strikes you failed. Hardly enough of a reason to get excited.
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
Eclectic Dreck said:
LewsTherin said:
And maybe the U.S. will qualify for the rugby world cup next year, and join the ranks of countries who play real sports ;)
While I respect the notion that Rugby is somehow the more manly sport because the players don't have the good sense to put on armor, in my view that seems to inherently limit what can happen in the game. Bravado aside, without all those silly pads one could not expect to regularly deliver and recive the sort of impacts that are common in the NFL without burning through the talent pool at an alarming rate.

That said, Rugby IS more entertaining than soccer simply because at least blood is drawn and nobody stops the game on account of a tantrum unless there is an obvious shattered bone or ruptured organ.
Thing is, that's the beauty of Rugby - the tackles may not be as visually impressive (most of the time), but there's an undeniable element of brutality and manliness in just taking an injury and keeping on playing. Personally, I'm a massive fan of Rugby 7's - it's a stripped down version of Rugby that relies on speed and maneuverability rather than the solid, unmoving defence and working the scrum.

spectrenihlus said:
Honestly I don't understand soccer (football for you annoying non Americans =P) you play one and a half hours for 1 point? Talk about a snooze fest. That's just my opinion.
Meh, at least the game keeps going for 45 minutes before a break. I don't know how Americans can watch their own national sports without wanting to kill themselves, just to have something to do while they watch nothing happening for half the game.

Basically, it's not the size of your score, it's how you get it.
 

Zwilorg

New member
Sep 11, 2008
119
0
0
Portuguese on this side...and damn... i thought england would own USA but those " USA bastards" have a way of doing things that i cant follow....

they make the other team play bad or something... they dont play nice football neither do they have clear goals shots but they or win or tie on this final world cup group stage... they did the same on World Cup 2002 against portugal the final score was 2-3 if i am not in error


but anyway!

the game was +- not worthy of a world cup but we are still on the beggining of this great trip ;)

ENJOY!!!!
 

wooty

Vi Britannia
Aug 1, 2009
4,252
0
0
ROBERT GREEEEEEN!!!!!!!!!

Mind you, cant be worse than the goal Algeria's keeper just let in, all the keepers seem to be blaming and hating the ball, they say its "too round", now theres an excuse.

OT: Didnt catch the match myself, I was in Yo! sushi with a bottle of sake and a few mates, knew the match would be dismal
 

GundamSentinel

The leading man, who else?
Aug 23, 2009
4,445
0
0
This says very little about the American qualities, but much much more about the state of the English team. I had such high hopes for them, but the chemistry just isn't there. Such a shame, as the English usually play very interesting football.
 

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
ChromeAlchemist said:
The England V USA match is something every Brit assumed we'd win with ease. And aside from that tragedy of a mistake, fair play to you, your defence was solid as hell.
Not really. America have a great little team, they beat Spain and almost Brazil in the Confederations Cup last year. I guess a lot of people who don't know all that much about football all crawl out of the woodwork for the World Cup which is understandable since it's everywhere. This lead to people expecting us to win what was a tough draw. The other two teams in Englands group are total gash though.
I wouldn't say the US defence were that great really, England had most of the ball but didn't place their shots, they would have won handily if Zamora was playing instead of Heskey.
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
That was an atrocious game, and an atrocious goal. England played better throughout, though still pretty poorly :/
 

Steamed Hams

New member
May 27, 2010
4
0
0
spectrenihlus said:
Honestly I don't understand soccer (football for you annoying non Americans =P) you play one and a half hours for 1 point? Talk about a snooze fest. That's just my opinion.
Everyone's got a sport they hate for that very reason, there's always something you find boring because you're just not involved in it.
For example, I tried to watch baseball once; suicide actually seemed like a viable option for that half hour I could stand it.
 

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,974
0
0
rt052192 said:
For all of those who watched the match on ABC the British announcer was a biased, arrogant ass. Take that!
That's because British people treat football matches like a matter of life or death. I wish America would have won, would that mean England would be out of the world cup? The earlier everyone over here shuts up about it the better.
 

TheGameXXVII

New member
Feb 1, 2010
280
0
0
meh, USA played average at best throughout the match, they had like a couple of proper shots throughout the entire match.

they only got a point from a flukey goal, yet all the American fans seem to think they owned the entire thing and won it.
 

TheGameXXVII

New member
Feb 1, 2010
280
0
0
i love the coverage on ITV, where they interviewed an American fan who had gone to South Africa to watch USA, yet he could only name 3 people on the USA first team.

maybe he should have stayed at home and watched Handegg.
 

HTID Raver

New member
Jan 7, 2010
568
0
0
:( i was greatly dissapointed in england that match...


hopefully they do better the next time! :D
 

yankeefan19

New member
Mar 20, 2009
663
0
0
I was happy with the result, but my mom was pissed (She's a huge soccer fan, raised in England, so... yeah) I am glad for the English Goalie that England didn't lose, otherwise he would probably have become the English Bill Buckner.
 

Duskwaith

New member
Sep 20, 2008
647
0
0
Well the usual media tripe will follow this.

If England had won we would have never heard the end of it, now they have drew they still somehow have somthing to go on about.

Im just happy they lost in the rugby aswell
 

T0BB0

New member
Jul 14, 2009
38
0
0
As an Englishman who couldn't give two craps about football, I'm kinda pleased the USA did well. Goes to show after all our bitching and moaning about how they don't play "real" football, they can actually put on a half-decent game.

... I'm guessing. I didn't watch the match. Maybe USA played really well, maybe England played really poorly. Maybe we should get off our pedestals and admit that we don't actually have a good team anymore and we're not going to win the cup (ever?) again, instead of all this "we weren't at the top of our game" nonsense. Maybe (just maybe) football doesn't matter.
 

Mr.Mattress

Level 2 Lumberjack
Jul 17, 2009
3,645
0
0
Not a sports fan... but Yay America? We kick ass regardless of which sport we play? Even if it's a sport we don't really play, don't like, and we only got a tie through accidents?