Valve's Devs Run Quad-Cores, 12 GB of RAM

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Valve's Devs Run Quad-Cores, 12 GB of RAM



In the buildup to Tuesday's release of the Team Fortress 2 Scout Update [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/89514-BONK-TF2s-Scout-Update-Next-Week], Valve has decided to release the specs of the PCs it uses in-house to develop its games ... and boy, they're a bit of a doozy.

Those of you who are familiar with Valve's Steam service knows that the system makes periodic checks as part of its Hardware Survey, sending the data to Valve so the developers can know what sort of machines their customers tend to be running their games on. The purpose of the Steam Hardware Survey, explains a Valve rep [http://storefront.steampowered.com/Steam/Marketing/message/2269/], is so that the Dev team has a better idea of how their games perform on normal users' computers instead of their own in-house ones.

No wonder they need to know how us mere mortals are running their games, because the Valve in-house PCs are veritable tiny gods of computation power:

[blockquote] * EVGA 780i SLI FTW Intel Motherboard
* Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz Quad-Core Processor
* 4GB PC2-6400 DDR2 1066MHz ram
(Crucial Ballistix, Kingston ValueRam)
* 1 x NVidia GTX280 1GB - OR - ATI 4870 1GB graphics card
* 1 x 250GB 7200RPM SATA HD
(Seagate, Western Digital)
* 1 x 500GB 7200RPM SATA HD
(Seagate, Western Digital)
* Antec Sonata III desktop case
* Zalman CPU Cooler
* 850W Antec power supply
* 1 x Dell 3008FPW-HC 30" LCD - OR - 2 x Dell 2001FP 20.1" LCD monitors
* Windows XP 32bit
[/blockquote]

Here I was, thinking that my Core 2 Duo and a whopping 4 GB of RAM - while not exactly the tip-top of the line - made me pretty badass in the grand scheme of things. I have been sufficiently humbled. To make matters even worse, apparently the company overhauls its rigs every 18 months or so, and their next upgrade is even better.

Hey Valve, I'll gladly take any of your old PCs, to get them off your hands. I mean, if you're not using them or anything...

(Via CVG [http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=208959%3fcid&skip=yes])

Permalink
 

johnman

New member
Oct 14, 2008
2,915
0
0
It is very impressive.
A very badass machine that can eat whatever the source engine can throw at it.
 

Nivag the Owl

Owl of Hyper-Intelligence
Oct 29, 2008
2,615
0
41
I wouldn't say that's god-like power. I mean, it's not impressive anyways. My system is better than this in most areas and I don't think of my PC as god-like ( most of the time :D ).

And for anyone interested my PC was around £1300.
 

Mr.Bubbles43

New member
Jul 23, 2008
70
0
0
Isn't this kinda overkill for source games?

I mean with a crappy computer you could get 300 fps with highest settings pretty easily.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Doesn't it seem a little obvious that PC game devloper would use awesome PC's. I mean, if they were using 5 years old single core machines we wouldn't be very impressed.
Actually, if they made L4d on 5 years old single core machines everyone would be VERY impressed...
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Jesus Christ.

I know this since yesterday, but holy crap. I'll have that kind of PC in... 5 years?
 

Mariena

New member
Sep 25, 2008
930
0
0
Tiny gods? Well, the overly expensive Q9550 is impressive.. the rest? Not so much. I would have expected at least a 640GB 7200 RPM disk.. those are cheap as well.

I'd love to have that 30" Dell screen, though.
 

WNxSajuukCor

New member
Oct 31, 2007
122
0
0
Those specs are what they have now. These are the specs they're moving to:

* EVGA X58 3X SLI Intel Motherboard
* Intel Corei7 940 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor
* 12GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1333MHz ram (Crucial Ballistix, Kingston ValueRam)
* 1 x NVidia GTX285 1GB - OR - ATI 4870 1GB graphics card
* 1 x 250GB 7200RPM SATA HD (Seagate, Western Digital)
* 1 x 500GB 7200RPM SATA HD (Seagate, Western Digital)
* Lian Li P60-F Case
* Intel CPU Cooler
* 850W Antec power supply
* 1 x Dell 3008FPW-HC 30" LCD - OR - 2 x Dell 2001FP 20.1" LCD monitors
* Windows Vista 64bit"
 

PsiMatrix

Gray Jedi
Feb 4, 2008
172
0
0
Mr.Bubbles43 said:
Isn't this kinda overkill for source games?

I mean with a crappy computer you could get 300 fps with highest settings pretty easily.
It's not just the speed, it's the consumation. I'd imagine that this would allow them to run several copies of the games they want and make software changes as they encounter glitches in-game.

I second the request to find out what these guys do with their old rigs and will gladly take them off their hands... no questions asked ;)
 

PsiMatrix

Gray Jedi
Feb 4, 2008
172
0
0
WNxSajuukCor said:
Those specs are what they have now. These are the specs they're moving to:

* EVGA X58 3X SLI Intel Motherboard
* Intel Corei7 940 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor
* 12GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1333MHz ram (Crucial Ballistix, Kingston ValueRam)
* 1 x NVidia GTX285 1GB - OR - ATI 4870 1GB graphics card
* 1 x 250GB 7200RPM SATA HD (Seagate, Western Digital)
* 1 x 500GB 7200RPM SATA HD (Seagate, Western Digital)
* Lian Li P60-F Case
* Intel CPU Cooler
* 850W Antec power supply
* 1 x Dell 3008FPW-HC 30" LCD - OR - 2 x Dell 2001FP 20.1" LCD monitors
* Windows Vista 64bit"
Can I be the first to say: God's excrement!
ie. Holy crap!
 

Skrapt

New member
May 6, 2008
289
0
0
Mr.Bubbles43 said:
Isn't this kinda overkill for source games?

I mean with a crappy computer you could get 300 fps with highest settings pretty easily.
Running games is a lot easier then building them, the source engine is a little annoying like that, one small leak and a computer like mine (which is by no means a slow coach) can take 12+ hours compiling a level before discovering anythings wrong.
 

jorgon

New member
Aug 16, 2008
1
0
0
I just built a computer in January that is near identical to the 12GB i7, but using a 920 instead. Cost was about $2000

Edit:
For anybody wondering "Why" this would be needed even for source: Debug builds run 1/2 to 1/4 full speed.
 

Filtertip

New member
Jan 30, 2009
94
0
0
they run there inhouse tests on quad core processers and yet where still whating for real dual/quad core support on games they are updating still like Day of Defeat Source :(

Those specs are forking sweet i must say, surely would'nt have to ask me twice if i wanted to take one off there hands for any reason at all.