Agreed. Lord of War is the superior of the sub-subgenre of "Dark comedies based on the lives of arms dealers". There are parts of it that were really funny, like watching a machine gun slowed down to make cash register sounds after each shot.Xsjadoblayde said:Should put a recommendation; watch Lord of War instead. Even if you've already seen it. Watch it again.
I don't think Wolf of Wall Street would have worked nearly as well if it took the time to condemn Belfort's actions. Sure, most people will agree that what he did was shady at best, and outright illegal at worst, but you don't need a film to tell you that. Especially since the film is shot as if Belfort himself is 'taking the viewer for a ride,' so he's not really going to morally condemn himself.KissingSunlight said:I think the apt comparison of War Dogs would be The Wolf of Wall Street. How Marter felt about War Dogs was how I felt about The Wolf of Wall Street when I first saw it. I was expecting some moral condemnation of the characters. However, with War Dogs, I thought it's wise to not be that harsh with the characters. I thought the wife of Miles Teller character was a solid Jiminy Cricket character. Also, who haven't known people who continue to stay with their spouses who constantly lie to them or worse?
I liked War Dogs. It was pretty much a critic-proof movie for me. I thought Jonah Hill gave a great performance. The only complaint is something that been going on with a lot of movies recently. It's the generic jukebox songs that people have heard a million times already. Like Fortunate Son by CCR. Which, by the way, I like that song. However, it doesn't lyrically reflects what is going on in the scene. I think this was what James Gunn was referring to when he apologize to the audience about his soundtrack choice. He knew other movies were going to copy it without knowing how to use it properly.
I was hoping The Wolf of Wall Street would be more like The Big Short. An insightful movie about greed ruined America's economy. I have came around to appreciate that movie for what it was.Hawki said:I don't think Wolf of Wall Street would have worked nearly as well if it took the time to condemn Belfort's actions. Sure, most people will agree that what he did was shady at best, and outright illegal at worst, but you don't need a film to tell you that. Especially since the film is shot as if Belfort himself is 'taking the viewer for a ride,' so he's not really going to morally condemn himself.KissingSunlight said:I think the apt comparison of War Dogs would be The Wolf of Wall Street. How Marter felt about War Dogs was how I felt about The Wolf of Wall Street when I first saw it. I was expecting some moral condemnation of the characters. However, with War Dogs, I thought it's wise to not be that harsh with the characters. I thought the wife of Miles Teller character was a solid Jiminy Cricket character. Also, who haven't known people who continue to stay with their spouses who constantly lie to them or worse?
I liked War Dogs. It was pretty much a critic-proof movie for me. I thought Jonah Hill gave a great performance. The only complaint is something that been going on with a lot of movies recently. It's the generic jukebox songs that people have heard a million times already. Like Fortunate Son by CCR. Which, by the way, I like that song. However, it doesn't lyrically reflects what is going on in the scene. I think this was what James Gunn was referring to when he apologize to the audience about his soundtrack choice. He knew other movies were going to copy it without knowing how to use it properly.
However, I do feel that Fortunate Son does match the scene in question, even if not exactly. Fortunate Son is a song that's been subject to lots of interpretation, but generally, it's been seen as anti-war, and criticizing the conduct of war without consequence (e.g. government sending off youth to fight their battles). So in the scene, we have something reminiscent of the Vietnam War, with a low-tech guerilla force coming under attack by a high-tech military force with a helicopter to boot, yet the way the scene is shot conveys apathy/annoyance on the soldiers' part. One of them gives the protagonists the finger, and the camera shows things in a sort of slow, apathic motion. It then shows the joy the two protagonists are experiencing - they're alive, and are about to get paid for the Beretta deal, profiting off a war without taking part in the conflict themselves or being subject to the same risks (their drive through Fallujah notwithstanding). Basically the entire concept of a 'war dog' or arms trader.