I'd imagine it takes up more space, too, with the sheer volume of vacuous bollocks and virus-laden "sites" sitting in stasis for the sole intent of phishing or gathering misplaced clicks.AccursedTheory said:By shear traffic used, yes, though I'd question is it takes up more 'space.'
In any case, porns not even number two any more. It was over taken by social media a couple years ago.
In comparison, there isn't that much porn. Most porn sites are shells of one another, echoing the same crap, or thinly-disguised search engines.
...Not that I would know. *ahem*