Cursesss! Foiled again! You shall rue thisss day humanssss!!!Budweiser said:you only say that because you are an inter dimensional shapeshifting reptiod that wants to keep us from learning the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Hazy992 said:I don't believe in any conspiracy theories because all the theories I've heard are either incredibly short-sighted or just outright stupid.
DOWN WITH THE DRACONIAN BROTHERHOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
now back to hiding in the faraday cage in my basement
Being a big Cyberpunk fan, I tend to agree with this. This, along with the sense that in some ways, Europe *seems* to be turning into a one-government entity and that corporations are starting to have pretty frightening levels of push-and-pull ability; makes me think that we're in for a pretty bleak 22nd century.McMullen said:Not sure if it counts as a conspiracy theory but...
I think SOPA and PIPA were not truly intended to address piracy at all, but really were engineered to cripple the Internet, or at least the parts where users can post their own content. I think the movie and music industry did this because they know that the Internet makes publishers obsolete, and they're trying to suppress it in the same way that they tried with the VCR.
It's pretty clear by now that SOPA and PIPA would not actually have done anything to stop piracy; it simply would have required people to use numerical addresses instead of human-readable ones to get to the site they wanted, and it was vague enough and written in such a way that it seemed to be directly targeting sites like YouTube. The fact that opposing viewpoints were not allowed in some of the initial hearings on the laws doesn't help.
I think that proposing laws like this for a purpose other than the stated one because the real purpose wouldn't pass should be a crime. It's fraud, and also they effectively lied to Congress, so although I doubt anyone was under oath, it would be nice if the penalties for perjury were part of it too. People who propose these laws should go to jail.
This actually makes a lot of sense. I do think that SOPA and PIPA were intended to fight piracy, but only as a secondary effect. I believe that, as a general rule, the primary purpose of such legislation is to put more power in the hands of coorporate entities and less power in the hands of the common man. We seem to be holding such tactics at bay for now, but if such legislation passes? Cyberpunk, here we come!McMullen said:Not sure if it counts as a conspiracy theory but...
I think SOPA and PIPA were not truly intended to address piracy at all, but really were engineered to cripple the Internet, or at least the parts where users can post their own content. I think the movie and music industry did this because they know that the Internet makes publishers obsolete, and they're trying to suppress it in the same way that they tried with the VCR.
It's pretty clear by now that SOPA and PIPA would not actually have done anything to stop piracy; it simply would have required people to use numerical addresses instead of human-readable ones to get to the site they wanted, and it was vague enough and written in such a way that it seemed to be directly targeting sites like YouTube. The fact that opposing viewpoints were not allowed in some of the initial hearings on the laws doesn't help.
I think that proposing laws like this for a purpose other than the stated one because the real purpose wouldn't pass should be a crime. It's fraud, and also they effectively lied to Congress, so although I doubt anyone was under oath, it would be nice if the penalties for perjury were part of it too. People who propose these laws should go to jail.
'I don't believe any big conspiricies... But I am a creationist'Hero in a half shell said:On a serious note, I don't believe any big conspiricies like 9/11, Bigfoot, Reptile people, etc. But I am a creationist, so there's that. (The universe was created 6-10,000 years ago, but created as an old universe with billions of years of development already written into it.)
It's really not that ridiculous. I mean, there are plenty of examples of the extremely rich influencing politics that are plain for everyone to see - the idea that they'd meet up to get things going their way is hardly far-fetched.remnant_phoenix said:I...well, I hesitate to say "believe." Let's say that I "suspect" that there are one or more extremely powerful secret societies of incredibly wealthy individuals that secretly influence world politics. If there isn't any such group/groups, I wouldn't neccessarily be surprised, but I would be disappointed, as that would mean that the political world is much less interesting than I thought.
I say tin 'foil' but what it actually was was 4 kilogram scale mail helmet made out of tin cans. I used to bounce bricks off of it when i was bored.Budweiser said:that is probably a good thing since actual tinfoil was replaced with aluminum foil (which we all know DOESN'T block CIA mind reading satellites) right after WW2... that hat must have been getting pretty old and rancidgigastar said:I discarded my tin foil hat many years ago.
Strangely enough it was about the same time i stopped giving a crap about religion.
about the 911 thing, i want to start by saying that i don't believe that's what happened either. but the people behind it wouldn't be punished. Honestly, no country in the UN is going to vote for an attack on the single most powerful military force in the world unless they're trying to take it over.Hunter65416 said:None for me really, There are some that are completly ridiculous like the US govournment setting up 9/11 which quite alot of people do believe but I just think theres no way they'd do it because if it was uncovered EVERYONE worldwide would be pissed, People in charge would be executed or inprisoned and the UN would take charge, It just wouldnt be worth doing that just to increse favour on the war, But if someone disagrees - tell me why
Theres a theory ive read up on about elvis being alive..maybe..but probably not
The stupidest one I can think of is the 'Paul is dead' one about the beatles covering up pauls death to save the public grief
What conspiracy theories do you believe - if any? and why?
EDIT: The one theory I do 100% agree with is the theory..no.. the fact that the big industries in the US (logging/paper/clothing/tabbaco/alcohol/ect) were behind making cannabis and hemp illegal.
Now that I think of it, The theory that the monarchy was responsible for dianas death springs to mind but thats also a 'ehm possibly'
And Ive changed my mind, The dumbest one I can think of is that some people believe that the holocaust never existed..I mean..come on..
Video was awesome.Hero in a half shell said:On a serious note, I don't believe any big conspiricies like 9/11, Bigfoot, Reptile people, etc. But I am a creationist, so there's that. (The universe was created 6-10,000 years ago, but created as an old universe with billions of years of development already written into it.)
I don't think that's really a conspiracy. Just because the majority of people don't believe, doesn't make it a conspiracy.ssgt splatter said:I believe in aliens. We can't be the only intelligent life forms in the entire universe. Our own solar system sure and surrounding solar systems like alpha centuri perhaps but not the entire universe.
I think I can one-up you on this one. I heard a conspiracy theory from one of my co-workers a couple of months ago about how most con-trails (the trails of steam generated by a plane's exhaust) are actually "chem trails" that the government is using to spread mercury, arsenic and other poisons throughout the atmosphere. Not in sufficient quantities to kill everyone, but as a means to keep people too busy trying to breath to revolt.Hunter65416 said:The stupidest one I can think of is the 'Paul is dead' one about the beatles covering up pauls death to save the public grief
Oh Chem trails, i love that one, "IGNORE SCIENCE, CLAIM CONTANIMATED WATER IS GOV'MENT LIZARDS FAULT". And ofcourse, lets not forget, if you DONT believe in our reptillian overlords, your a sheep.Agayek said:I think I can one-up you on this one. I heard a conspiracy theory from one of my co-workers a couple of months ago about how most con-trails (the trails of steam generated by a plane's exhaust) are actually "chem trails" that the government is using to spread mercury, arsenic and other poisons throughout the atmosphere. Not in sufficient quantities to kill everyone, but as a means to keep people too busy trying to breath to revolt.Hunter65416 said:The stupidest one I can think of is the 'Paul is dead' one about the beatles covering up pauls death to save the public grief
It's pretty ridiculous.