I was wondering about that myself.Hmmm...why is that? If you're in orbit, would not accelerating inward be as easy as outward?
I was wondering about that myself.Hmmm...why is that? If you're in orbit, would not accelerating inward be as easy as outward?
Hmmm...why is that? If you're in orbit, would not accelerating inward be as easy as outward?
Well, I read that. And I'm not in the habit of doubting the people who do mathematics for NASA.![]()
It's Surprisingly Hard to Go to the Sun - NASA
The Sun contains 99.8 percent of the mass in our solar system. Its gravitational pull is what keeps everything here, from tiny Mercury to the gas giants towww.nasa.gov
All I'm sayin' is, renting a woodchipper is way less expensive than either of those.If you hate someone, don't wish for them to be launched into the Sun, wish for them to be launched out of the Solar System.
Takes less energy. Rocket propellant is expensive, ok?
Why spend any money at all? You have a stomach for a reason. You'll end up saving money!All I'm sayin' is, renting a woodchipper is way less expensive than either of those.
Upon doing further research (ie, asking my father, who is a physicist), the reason it's easier to go out of the system than into the sun is because the orbital velocity of the Earth is more than half the escape velocity of the Sun. So we are more than halfway out to begin with.While I don't want to argue with NASA about this, they are talking about reaching the sun (or close to it) by a set timeframe. Which, ok, but if you are just launching summat at the Sun and not caring how long it takes to get there, not sure how much of that would apply.