What if Hollywood was more interested in building a better future rather than excessive materialism?

AstroCadet69

Regular Member
Sep 30, 2021
14
4
13
Country
USA
What if instead of mansions, yachts, and private jets the people of Hollywood in the 90s and 2000s were more interested in turning their smog covered city


into a utopia with electric cars and green public transport powered by solar, fusion, and nuclear power?



They were also inspired by the French to improve management of nuclear technology.
https://www.reuters.com/business/en...ar-power-plants-inspector-general-2022-02-10/

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/readings/french.html

What if instead of being obsessed with owning BMWs and Porsches they supported the funding of electric car development much earlier causing Tesla like cars to be as common in the late 2000s as they are in our timeline's 2023 America?


What if they also supported increasing NASA's budget to at least 1 percent?


Which to leads to humanity having a permanent presence on Mars and the asteroid belt with both crewed and robotic nuclear power spacecraft by the 2030s and fusion powered spacecraft by the 2050s as well as small asteroids that have been spin up to provide gravity for habitats within those asteroids providing shelters to miner astronauts.



And they were excited about funding fusion and 3d printed houses as well leading to those things being commonplace in 2030s American society.





America would also have to improve it's education system to make all of that happen.

That has been done before.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/10/how-sputnik-changed-u-s-education/

It seemed like 90s and 2000s American high school youth were more excited by materialism rather than being excited to build a better future like 60s kids were.

Has materialism distracted people from building a better world?

Should the world have committed to this vision back in the 90s regardless of economic cost?

Perhaps Disney can use "EPCOT" to promote this vision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hanselthecaretaker2

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,409
4,062
118
Which to leads to humanity having a permanent presence on Mars and the asteroid belt with both crewed and robotic nuclear power spacecraft by the 2030s and fusion powered spacecraft by the 2050s as well as small asteroids that have been spin up to provide gravity for habitats within those asteroids providing shelters to miner astronauts.
That timeline is not remotely feasible.

It seemed like 90s and 2000s American high school youth were more excited by materialism rather than being excited to build a better future like 60s kids were.
The present we are living in was the future for those 60s kids. This is what they made. Don't blame the younger generation for the sins of their parents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Satinavian
Jun 11, 2023
3,329
2,416
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
There is no accountability from generation to generation. It’s always the “last one’s” fault, but change and improvement can and will happen under a certain very-difficult-to-obtain set of conditions.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,677
5,934
118
Australia
How is the entertainment industry’s responsibility to craft a better future? That’s the job of the government by enacting the will of its people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawki

Satinavian

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 30, 2016
2,057
851
118
Yes, American culture is very materialistic.

No, not every grand vision of the past that has been quietly abandoned has actually been feasible.

Yes, some things would certainly have deserved more investment in the past.



Also American school education, especially everything STEM related has not a good reputation. But being not actually in the US or in school i can't really weigh in on that point.
 
Last edited: