Heavily, heavily liberal.
Oh, not politically?
Pure, unadulterated lawful good. Except for all the times it isn't.
Oh, not politically?
Pure, unadulterated lawful good. Except for all the times it isn't.
What is the Escapist's alignment?
- Thread starter Erana
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Plot a coordinate plane where (clockwise from top left) the quadrants are Neutral Good, Chaotic Good, True Neutral, and Chaotic Evil. The origin is the "four corners" point of all four alignments and the axes bound the alignments exactly.
Now apply the following equation:
(x-2)² + (y+1)² = 9.
Graph the circle; everything inside it represents the range of drift in my alignment. The largest part of the circle is in Chaotic Neutral.
Now apply the following equation:
(x-2)² + (y+1)² = 9.
Graph the circle; everything inside it represents the range of drift in my alignment. The largest part of the circle is in Chaotic Neutral.
No, I would say it's Lawful Stupid Evil. And considering the number of people I see getting put on probation/suspended/banned, I'd say it's leaning more towards just Stupid Evil.Time Warp said:
I'd call it neutral intelegent because, while forums can be chaotic, the chaos has an order to it, and the contributors do update regularly, even though they might be controversial. Also, You cannot say it is good or evil, only the individuals who are here can be described that way.
(Also, while I do get the rough alignment system, I don't actually know the details, like what exactly makes the line between law and chaos, so feel free to correct me an anything[Just don't be a dick about it])
(Also, while I do get the rough alignment system, I don't actually know the details, like what exactly makes the line between law and chaos, so feel free to correct me an anything[Just don't be a dick about it])
Lawful evil sums it up pretty well I guess.ToonLink said:
Some are chaotic evil, and they get banned. Some are lawful good too, and they get to stick around. For the most part Lawful evil I guess.
Chaotic neutral. Not necessarily evil, we just have a lot of people that don't give a crap about morality. Which kind of contributes to the chaotic part as well: a society based around a post-modern idea of subjective morality would essentially have no government, and would probably tear itself apart. So I say chaotic neutral.
I personally think the joker is chaotic neutral (at least Heath Ledger's was)Et3rnalLegend64 said:
Chaotic or lawful neutral sound close, but true neutral sounds cooler because of its difficulty to achieve.
Did I make a typeo in my OP, or are you referring to something else?Johnmw said:Chaotic-emo? There is a fair proportion of this site that will argue against anything because it's popular.... (prepares for the hate)
EDIT: Spell checker didn't get anyting? I didn't know London slang was internet lingo, or that dyslexia could be cool.
Chaotic Neutral.
No one here is saving babies from fires, and no one here is eating them, so we must lie in the middle somewhere.
That being said, most of the people here just do as they please, and that is where the chaos begins!
No one here is saving babies from fires, and no one here is eating them, so we must lie in the middle somewhere.
That being said, most of the people here just do as they please, and that is where the chaos begins!
