SJW is already a poorly defined term, I would hate to add more dumb terms to the fire. Mostly I just consider them a different flavor of easily offended warrior of a slightly different stripe. Oh sure, they'll come up with all sorts of special reasoning for why their offended reactions are justified, but when I look at them, all I see are the same thin skinned reactionaries, just with a slightly different target than the people they whine about.
There's different language involved, one side avoiding using the language of the other, the anti-SJW side usually doing a boatload of linguistic gymnastics to avoid words like problematic and offended, even though a lot of people on the outside can easily see that offended is exactly what they are.
It's just people trying to bully others who disagree with them and paint them in hyperbolic language as an enemy that must be fought, one side wrapping itself in the flag of morality and tolerance, the other under the banner of free speech, neither side really caring about those issues, just using them as a justification for calling out people that offend them in some way.
By that of course, I mean people blinded by ideology that just can't stop, calling out shitty people on one side or the other doesn't make you automatically their polar opposite. there are many people on this site on both sides of the argument that I would consider to be outside the center, but not falling into either the, "SJW" category, or their reactionary opposites. I don't want to come off like I'm advocating total apathy, there are real points to discuss, both about social issues, and freedom of expression, just that some people need to lay off the kool-aid.