Which country is least likely to start World War 3?

Jackpot524

Certified Canuck
May 24, 2009
152
0
0
@ ApeShapeDiety

...

Amsterdam is a city, it's the capital of the Netherlands... even then, all their religious controversy is that sector of the world is bound to piss someone off.
 

thelonewolf266

New member
Nov 18, 2010
708
0
0
hate to burst your bubble but if world war 3 happens no matter where you are your dead chances are the majority of us won't know who started the war. i got agree with luxembourg as being the least likely to start it
 

Magnesium360

FDA Approved!
Mar 9, 2010
296
0
0
I agree with Zeriah. Switzerland starting a world war would be unlikely, and kinda ironic seeing as they are well known for their neutrality.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
I'm gonna say Siam... or maybe Persia. Hard to start a war when you don't exist anymore.
 

TilMorrow

Diabolical Party Member
Jul 7, 2010
3,246
0
0
Wadders said:
Luxembourg.
I agree with this guy. Luxembourg is too small of a country to try and start World War 3 and it is surrounded on all sides.

Also possibly Switzerland but I wouldn't put it past them to try. :p

King Toasty said:
I'm going with Canada on this one, since we're quiet and have a very small army.
I think Canada might be able to successfully start World War 3. If they try brainwashing the world through Maple Syrup I think they could succeed.