Which developer has the most personality?
- Thread starter ohgodalex
- Start date
Doublefine because their website is the only game company website that I view regularly. Tim Shafer writes funny posts on the Doublefine Action News blog and I like reading Tasha's comic. They also put up fun web games every now and again.
oh ummmmmmm... ether
valve because thay let Garrys Mod/GMod (best computer game EVAH!! look it up on Google)use all their stuff
or bungie because unlike evry other MAJOR game ppl thay like it when ppl find glitches and stuff and just look at their trailers fer the map packs!
valve because thay let Garrys Mod/GMod (best computer game EVAH!! look it up on Google)use all their stuff
or bungie because unlike evry other MAJOR game ppl thay like it when ppl find glitches and stuff and just look at their trailers fer the map packs!
I think I could only pick the developers that bug me the least. Those would probably be INSOMNIAC and NAUGHTY DOG.
You mean that thing they never update?Machines Are Us said:
I would've said Valve a year ago but can't do so with good conscience now that they've lubed up their L4D fanbase and are aiming for penetration. Now I'll say Relic because, even though they eventually let Buggo go, she was the best customer relations agent ever in the history of time.
Valve. They listen to their fans, always make really great games with lots of humour and personality. Also, for example when there was an outcry that they didn't give enough DLC for L4D before making L4D2, they listened and made the games compatible with each other.
They aren't some big company who makes games, and hopes to sell them based on brand recognition, they really care what people think of them and want to improve games based on what their fans tell them.
They aren't some big company who makes games, and hopes to sell them based on brand recognition, they really care what people think of them and want to improve games based on what their fans tell them.
Yes, I would agree with this as they also make lots of patches and mods for their games too.S53 said:
I also like the fact that all the suggestions they got from fans they couldnt put in Oblivon they took the piss out of using Miak the Liar (If thats how you spell it).
I disagree with Capcom due to thier asshole DLC policy, paying for some shit that's already on the disc. Fuck that!ohgodalex said:
I'm gonna go with Bethesda because
a) they interact with thier community through the forums
b) they listen to us and admit thier mistakes when they make them
c) they give the fans what they want. broken steel addressed all the major issues people had with Fallout 3.
I would argue that, since the Versus mode was never advertised prior to the release of the game, and it was not assumed that we would get it for free, complaining about it is moronic. We got optional content that some felt was worth the price, while others did not. It's as simple as that.miracleofsound said:
It may be a very little snowball, but it stands atop a very steep slope.ohgodalex said:
Let's not forget the SF4 outfits either... by the way in both cases I did not spend my money on the DLC in question, so implying that I am 'moronic' seems a little counter productive to your thread's flow of discussion.
I did not say that you were moronic, but that the complaining is moronic in and of itself.miracleofsound said:
And, in both instances, Capcom is simply trying to make money. They are, as is mentioned in the Kotaku article that I linked to, a company. They know how to run a profitable business, and I fail to see how their decision to make some of their content, that people were perfectly happy without, optional and paid condemns them in any way.
I'm sorry that you took offense to the statement, though. I'm used to arguing with my friends, who come up with hypothetical arguments to try and emulate the reasoning of people that I disagree with.