Why certain people will defend a clearly bad game

fezgod

New member
Dec 7, 2012
120
0
0
So, I'm sure its no surprise that The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct is receiving terrible reviews but what I'm surprised about is how many people are defending the game saying things like:

"The reviewer played the game like it was COD, you can't play the game like that,"
"Graphics are all the reviewer cared about"
"MY COPY of the game doesn't have all those bugs,"
(Granted, most of these opinions come from youtube comments so they're validity is in question)

I feel as though the reason why people will defend a really bad game because they preordered it and are now defending their purchase to justify to themselves that they didn't just waste 60$.

Agree/Disagree?
And can you think of other games that were clearly bad but you'll still see people defending them?

Disclaimer: I'm not talking about a game that can be good or bad, depending on your tastes, or a game that you personally think is overrated. I'm talking about games that are almost universally considered shitty but some people are still inexplicably defending.
 

Toxic Sniper

New member
Mar 13, 2013
143
0
0
...Maybe they just like it?

Some people like games widely considered bad. Hell, the entire Roguelike genre is hated by reviewers in the west, but there are some people who swear by Roguelikes as the best video games ever. We can disagree with them on whether those games are bad, but it seems mean-spirited to assume that they are just trying to self-justify their purchase.
 

madwarper

New member
Mar 17, 2011
1,841
0
0
fezgod said:
"MY COPY of the game doesn't have all those bugs,"
(Granted, most of these opinions come from youtube comments so they're validity is in question)
The other two comments may have been subjective opinions... But, this last one seems pretty objective.

If the reviewer complains about how buggy they observed the game to be, it's just as valid as when someone says that they have yet to encounter such bugs in their copy.

Personally, I've played New Vegas dozens of times, and during every one of the character creation sections, the doctor's neck remained intact.
I know that other people have encountered bugs where it dislocates and just rolls around his shoulders, I've seen the videos, but that doesn't change the fact that it never happened to me.
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Apr 8, 2020
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
Some people just like enjoying a train wreck.

I would equate it to a bad movie, but there are obviously major differences between the two. However, the premise is still there that people will play something just to see how bad it is and they might even enjoy it. Hell, I've meet people that enjoy Sonic 06 because of how shitty it is, and will defend it to a point, but will say it's still bad.

So yeah, train wrecks man.
 

fezgod

New member
Dec 7, 2012
120
0
0
madwarper said:
fezgod said:
"MY COPY of the game doesn't have all those bugs,"
(Granted, most of these opinions come from youtube comments so they're validity is in question)
The other two comments may have been subjective opinions... But, this last one seems pretty objective.

If the reviewer complains about how buggy they observed the game to be, it's just as valid as when someone says that they have yet to encounter such bugs in their copy.

Personally, I've played New Vegas dozens of times, and during every one of the character creation sections, the doctor's neck remained intact.
I know that other people have encountered bugs where it dislocates and just rolls around his shoulders, I've seen the videos, but that doesn't change the fact that it never happened to me.
Funny that you should mention New Vegas because I've only had one major crash in New Vegas but beyond that, I've never encountered any serious visual/gameplay bugs. But when I put the game in my friend's xbox, it wouldn't even load.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Apr 10, 2020
16,998
1,069
118
Country
Argentina
I would contest that there're no "clearly bad games" to begin with, just games you like or you don't like.
 

WhiteFangofWhoa

New member
Jan 11, 2008
2,548
0
0
Well Game Grumps wouldn't have kept going on their Sonic 06 playthrough longer than any other game (up to 78 parts by my last check) if it didn't get subscribers.

'Youtube comments'. Can't really take those seriously when 50% of the time the comments devolve into flame wars. Consider for a moment that every single movie on Metacritic and the Internet Movie Database has at least one 0-star user review and at least one 10-star review regardless of actual quality even if the review's text is as short as 'it's a stinkeroo' (seriously, I saw that one for the first Lord of the Rings). You can find someone online who will defend/attack anything, whether or not they're being serious or trolling. Conversely if someone had never gone online and hadn't played many games they might think Sonic 06 is okay.

'Clearly bad' also in the eye of the beholder most of the time. Many of the games I play have big flaws but for the positive qualities I'm willing to overlook them.

'Trying to justify the 60$ purchase', yeah we're all guilty of this. We don't like feeling like we've wasted our cash on something we'll never play again after the first time.
 

WoW Killer

New member
Mar 3, 2012
965
0
0
Why the hell should public near-consensus influence your own opinion? If all we were concerned about was trends among the public, then all those games highly regarded among us connoisseurs would be called shit, and we'd all be playing Angry Birds or something instead. Mark of the Ninja? Not as good as Fruit Ninja; we had a vote, it's the law. Journey? Didn't they cover that Glee song? We're all anti-populists at heart, so why must we resort to such crass populism as soon as we're connected together on the internet? Fuck that. Free your mind. Play the games you want to play, and fuck what anybody else thinks.

In other words, all I hear is "stop liking what I don't like".

I have no opinions on this Walking Dead game by the way; never played it.
 

MetricFurlong

New member
Apr 8, 2010
81
0
0
fezgod said:
I feel as though the reason why people will defend a really bad game because they preordered it and are now defending their purchase to justify to themselves that they didn't just waste 60$.
The problem there though is why a lot of the people who paid full-price don't seem to have any problem slamming it. I certainly don't think the Mass Effect 3 ending outrage was contained to those who'd waited a while before buying it. I mean, you could just as easily assume that someone who paid more would have more reason to savage a game they didn't like, given that they will have 'wasted' more money on it than someone who bought it second hand.

Sure, maybe a few people might do that, but I think in most cases it's likely just more of a case of personal taste/standards (as it is with most forms of media and art).
 

Windcaler

New member
Nov 7, 2010
1,332
0
0
fezgod said:
So, I'm sure its no surprise that The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct is receiving terrible reviews but what I'm surprised about is how many people are defending the game saying things like:

"The reviewer played the game like it was COD, you can't play the game like that,"
"Graphics are all the reviewer cared about"
"MY COPY of the game doesn't have all those bugs,"
(Granted, most of these opinions come from youtube comments so they're validity is in question)

I feel as though the reason why people will defend a really bad game because they preordered it and are now defending their purchase to justify to themselves that they didn't just waste 60$.

Agree/Disagree?
And can you think of other games that were clearly bad but you'll still see people defending them?

Disclaimer: I'm not talking about a game that can be good or bad, depending on your tastes, or a game that you personally think is overrated. I'm talking about games that are almost universally considered shitty but some people are still inexplicably defending.
Actually I played the game for my own review of it and its not all bad. I think what happened with the title is the developer wanted to make a really cool survival focused game but its clear the game didnt get the time it needed to be a great game. So IMO Activision killed any chance of the game being anymore then shovelware by giving the developer just six months to work on it.

That said, let me talk about what features I did find interesting in it. The first being the actual survival elements. In the game you can enter places, search for resources kind of like dead island but you can also send your survivors out to find supplies. They have a chance of not coming back (which hasnt happened to me yet) and you can increase the chance they will by giving them weapons (although apparently a hammer and a high powered hunting rifle give the same bonus). You can also choose your route and how you get there. What I mean is when you select a destination you have the choice of using the highways, regular streets, or back roads and each has a chance of the vehicle breaking down and of you finding a place to scavenge for resources. These are some really good ideas but were executed poorly and the game was hurt worse by it being a terrible PC port and the lack of time the developers had to work on it.

So no, its not all bad. There were great idea but it was overall badly executed. Its certainly not worth a full price AAA release. I wouldnt even price it as $20 worth it but it shouldnt be written off either. Its actually quite sad that a game with potential got destroyed because the publisher rushed it out but we've seen it happen before with Dragon age 2 and we will see it happen again down the road.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Well yes but then we all do that, once we invest ourselves enough into a game we will defend it beyond all reason.
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
I think a lot of it comes down to there being a pretty distinct separation between the objective qualities of a game and what one's experience with the game is. When you enjoy something, you're much more likely to gloss over it's shortcomings and loudly praise it's successes. Sometimes it's because you just don't see the bad parts and sometimes it's because you do but find the overall enjoyment provided more than makes up for it.

Basically, from my perspective, objectively bad games do exist.. but that doesn't mean that you are unable to get a certain amount of enjoyment out of them.
 

Rylingo

New member
Aug 13, 2008
397
0
0
People are passionate. When you critique something they are passionate about they can often see it as a personal insult. You are making negative comment about something they hold dear.

Critics have got to accept this though. It would be hypocritical as a critic to not accept some criticism.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
Different strokes for different folks. Besides, based on the reviews I've seen Survival Instincts is...polarizing I think would be a good term. What you really need is a truly bad game as a sort of template...something like Predator on the Nintendo. Just look up some gameplay for it. Hell, if you're a fan of Screw Attack's website you may recall how last summer the guys over there were obsessed with the game! I'm going to defend it though because despite how bad it is, beating that game is one of the most satisfying victories I've achieved as a game player.

Not as satisfying as beating Zelda 2 on the NES but this is a thread about bad games... unarguably, irredeemably bad games.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
14,052
978
118
I'll tell you why I will defend "clearly bad games"

There is one critiria that determines if the game is good or bad for me:

Did I enjoy playing it?

That's it. If I am having fun, I could not care much less over anything else.
 

Dryk

New member
Dec 4, 2011
981
0
0
fezgod said:
I feel as though the reason why people will defend a really bad game because they preordered it and are now defending their purchase to justify to themselves that they didn't just waste 60$.
There's been some research on that effect. They also found that you're less likely to admit that a product you bought is bad if you've already told other people to buy it. The paper I found is from the 80s though so marketing research may have moved on since then.
 

StashAugustine

New member
Jan 21, 2012
179
0
0
People liked certain elements of the game (especially if it's the only one of its kind), so they defend the bad parts, either because they're trying to rationalize them into something good (hello, Mass Effect) or because they're simply trying to make themselves feel better.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
Look at the Wikipedia reception section, I'm surprised someone managed to get that in there...

Reception

Polygon were disappointed in the game and gave it a 3 out of 10 rating, stating that: "The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct is the exact sort of lazy, cheap cash-grab that gave licensed games a bad name in the first place" and compared playing the game to "listening to a roomful of barely competent musicians, each of whom is playing a completely different song. And every once in a while one kicks you in the groin. Also, you have a sunburn."[9]
Sounds like something Yahtzee would come up with!
 

Xdeser2

New member
Aug 11, 2012
465
0
0
fezgod said:
So, I'm sure its no surprise that The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct is receiving terrible reviews but what I'm surprised about is how many people are defending the game saying things like:

"The reviewer played the game like it was COD, you can't play the game like that,"
"Graphics are all the reviewer cared about"
"MY COPY of the game doesn't have all those bugs,"
(Granted, most of these opinions come from youtube comments so they're validity is in question)

I feel as though the reason why people will defend a really bad game because they preordered it and are now defending their purchase to justify to themselves that they didn't just waste 60$.

Agree/Disagree?
And can you think of other games that were clearly bad but you'll still see people defending them?

Disclaimer: I'm not talking about a game that can be good or bad, depending on your tastes, or a game that you personally think is overrated. I'm talking about games that are almost universally considered shitty but some people are still inexplicably defending.
......Maybe because your opinion isn't the only valid one?

Its a completely subjective medium. I personally HATE CoD (with a vengeance) but I have friends that cant get enough of it, and from time to time I'll play it with them just to chill.

Every opinion is Valid