Scrustle said:
But nihilism doesn't say that there are no morals at all, only that there are no objective morals. It's a recognition that there is no single morality that is true for all and that it can be flexible. You could still be a nihilist and prefer to live in a world where people aren't randomly killing children or abusing sporting archive books from the future, because that would make society and your own life far worse than if you co-operated and helped people. But you do it not because it's written in stone by some higher power, but just because it would lead to a preferable outcome for everyone involved.
Nihilism is a lot more extreme than this. The idea that nothing really matters is more correctly defined as Existential. It is about living in the moment, and crafting your own morals and priorities, because nothing is absolute. You can be existential and have morals.
As I was taught about it (in A-level English class) nihilism is a more extreme form of this thinking, it accepts that there are no absolutes, but takes that to mean that therefore the most desirable place for a person to be is in a state of complete separation from everything. All morals, social obligations, cultural constructs should be completely abandoned. A man should throw them off and stand seperate from that whole idea of doing something because you think it is right, or even because you think it is pleasurable. There was a quote about nihilism saying that actually taking no action is preferable to doing something; because nothing is certain, nothing is important, nothing has a point, so why bother.
Nihilism aims to create an emotionless, solid state of being in man, where he is completely seperate from the rest of the universe. No one can ever be criticised for their actions, no one can ever be wrong, no one can ever be right. There is no love, no hate, no pleasure or pain, just the self.
In short, it's really weird