Will Game of Thrones' finale suffer the same fate as Mass Effect 3's ending?

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
Both Books and TV I mean.

IMO yes in the sense that the Books ending will be somewhat dissapointing while the TV series will end so badly that the backlash will be even worse than Mass Effect 3's ending backlash.

I forsee millions upon millions of videos on youtube disecting every single detail of why the conclusion sucked.

Whether or not I think the Conclusion will be a War Crime of Mengela proportions is another matter entirely. I just hope I will agree with the mainstream if it sucks.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
In a word, "no."

In more words, I doubt it. I mean, I don't doubt there'll be some disgruntled people, because there's always disgruntled people. ME3's ending was reviled because of the following:

-It's deus ex machina (the Crucible comes out of nowhere, the Star Child comes out of nowhere, its solutions are akin to space magic)

-It's thematically at odds with the rest of the series (choice is negated, and even if you did unite the quarians and geth, this apparently means nothing to the Catalyst)

-The original ending just stops dead in its tracks (the Extended Cut makes things a bit better though)

Game of Thrones isn't inherently going to have any of these issues. Unless cast members are lying, the ending's been planned well ahead of time. Unless a Crucible equivalent is suddenly introduced, we don't need to worry about that - we've had seven seasons to see how the White Walkers work, how they came into being, and know that if the Night King is killed, they all fall (or they could be overcome with brute force by the combined armies of Westeros - the Reapers couldn't). And I doubt that GoT will just stop dead like ME3 originally did.

I'm sure there'll be angry fanboys (there's already people claiming that GoT has become "femnized"...course every media franchise has become "feminized" according to some people, so what do I know?), but I highly doubt it'll come close to the fallout over ME3's ending.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
It's very unlikely considering how they're both completely different mediums.

That said Game of Thrones will probably end in a way that nobody is completely happy and there'll be rage all over the web - but it won't be Mass Effect level.

That said I'm noticing a shift in tone in Game of Thrones and it feels more and more like the typical fantasy epic. I just don't believe the main characters are going to die so I'm never concerned when they're in peril. Jon surviving his swim in a frozen lake and being Deus Ex'd by his uncle is one sign, then there's Jamie charging a dragon and Bronn pulling HIM out of a lake in full plate armour.

Why don't they wear helmets anyway?
 

JohnnyDelRay

New member
Jul 29, 2010
1,322
0
0
Yeah it will be a mass of rage, but just because people are quite emotionally invested in it, and you won't be able to please everyone. But that's just a very general outlook.

You can expect something like Breaking Bad I suppose, at the very least. Grim ending (as expected), however all loopholes are closed in a somewhat satisfying way, regardless of how improbably. But it's a fantasy setting, so literally anything is possible at this point.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
I didn't realize the GoT series had a 'choose your own path' parts to the books...
 
Apr 17, 2009
1,751
0
0
I think the sheer size of its fan base means there's always going to be a decent chunk of people disappointed by how it ends. Though I do wonder how many will have legitimate grievances and how many will just be annoyed their pet theory was wrong and they don't get to feel clever
 

King Billi

New member
Jul 11, 2012
595
0
0
Hawki said:
Game of Thrones isn't inherently going to have any of these issues. Unless cast members are lying, the ending's been planned well ahead of time. Unless a Crucible equivalent is suddenly introduced, we don't need to worry about that - we've had seven seasons to see how the White Walkers work, how they came into being, and know that if the Night King is killed, they all fall (or they could be overcome with brute force by the combined armies of Westeros - the Reapers couldn't). And I doubt that GoT will just stop dead like ME3 originally did.
The thing is though it's not unheard of for a long ongoing narrative (book,TV etc) to completely scrap an original preplanned ending if the creators feel it has been leaked or spoiled in some way just to keep the ending a surprise, and with so many fans connected across the internet theorising and discussing the books over so many years I'd be willing to bet that the original "planned ahead of time" ending is already out their somewhere in some GOT predictions thread or video.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
King Billi said:
I'd be willing to bet that the original "planned ahead of time" ending is already out their somewhere in some GOT predictions thread or video.
I'm sure it is, but if someone got lucky in their predictions, does that count as 'spoiling' the ending? If the showrunners altered their plan to make sure their ending wasn't predicted by anyone...well, good luck with that (unless you want to get really out there).
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
Err last time I've read, aren't they shooting additional endings (three) in a attempt to troll the hackers should they steal and leak the episodes again?

It would be an epic fail should all three endings turns out to be super bad!
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,257
0
0
I'm not expecting the TV series ending to be any good, but I also don't think it's going to trigger the same level of hatred "Mass Effect 3" did. There'll be outrage regardless of what they do because the writing will be terrible, but so long as it's at least partially set up and doesn't come out of nowhere I'm sure it won't be so legendarily reviled.

As for the book series... is GRRM even gonna finish it at this rate?
 

bastardofmelbourne

New member
Dec 11, 2012
1,038
0
0
The last season has kind of left me pessimistic about how well the final one will turn out.

I mean, season six was really great. It left me all hyped up for Dany going to Westeros and Jon Snow finally getting into WWZ-mode and Cersei going crazy and Arya...stabbing people, I guess. But season seven made all those plot points land with the strength of a wet fart. Then the arc of the entire season is rendered moot in the last episode when the White Walkers use their zombie dragon to break down the wall, which means that Jon and Dany accidentally doomed humanity to a zombie apocalypse as part of a failed gambit to convince a crazy ***** to not be so dang crazy for once.

So...I'm not optimistic. Which is good? One of the problems with ME3's ending was just that it didn't meet expectations. People were expecting something different, with more closure, and what they got was something vague and esoteric. So maybe it's better if my expectations for GoT are lower...?

I mean, I actually liked ME3's ending, but that's just me being weird, I guess.
 

CaitSeith

Formely Gone Gonzo
Legacy
Jun 30, 2014
5,349
362
88
bastardofmelbourne said:
vague and esoteric
I disagree. If they wanted to be vague and esoteric, they wouldn't had added the starchild to wrap up the story and explain the Reapers' origin and purpose. That's like if in the 2001: Space Odyssey ending the monolith spoke directly to Bowman and explained him its purpose and how its powers work.

OT: I don't know GoT. Is there something left to be unexplained in the plot? Anyway, it's execution what matters, so IMO, it could go either way.
 

Pseudonym

Regular Member
Legacy
Feb 26, 2014
802
8
13
Country
Nederland
You never know beforehand but my guess?

No. The ending will undoubtedly piss off some people, but not nearly to the same degree as the ME3 ending. The reason it'll piss people of is that it seems GoT is no longer an exercise of indulging in cynicism. At least not the most recent seasons. This means that the good guys will probably win, though with heavy casualties of course, and we'll end up with Jon and/or Dany as leaders of a scarred but somewhat improved westeros. Or maybe at a pinch, Cercei gets to survive and some kind of peaceful coexistence is achieved. (I hope not, Cercei is horrible) That is somewhat boring but mostly expected and not a terrible ending. This is unlike mass effect 3 which had a terrible ending that was all the more disapointing after mass effect 2's ending which was good.

Also, a lot depends on how old Martin gets and how much stamina he has in old age. I don't read the books be he is apparently slow with writing them and already somewhat old. Then again, he could also live to be over 100 for all we know so we shouldn't be too pessimistic.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Pseudonym said:
No. The ending will undoubtedly piss off some people, but not nearly to the same degree as the ME3 ending. The reason it'll piss people of is that it seems GoT is no longer an exercise of indulging in cynicism. At least not the most recent seasons. This means that the good guys will probably win, though with heavy casualties of course, and we'll end up with Jon and/or Dany as leaders of a scarred but somewhat improved westeros. Or maybe at a pinch, Cercei gets to survive and some kind of peaceful coexistence is achieved. (I hope not, Cercei is horrible) That is somewhat boring but mostly expected and not a terrible ending. This is unlike mass effect 3 which had a terrible ending that was all the more disapointing after mass effect 2's ending which was good.
I wouldn't be surprised if there's some cynicism to come. Almost everyone's onboard to fight the White Walkers, but Cersei's still plotting. Season 7 is a weaker season than others in my mind, but I don't think it's entirely without cynicism. A motif of sorts is that brute force does indeed achieve results. Tyrion wants to have a bloodless siege of King's Landing, but what happens? Dany loses her fleet (and Dorne in the process), her siege of Casterly Rock is a phyric victory, and at the same time, she loses House Tyrell. It's only when she commits mass murder on the field that she gets a solid victory. Dany wants to "break the wheel," and Tyrion believes in a better world, but at the end of the day, she only gains a victory by using the same tactics that Aegon did. And while she does hook up with Jon in more ways than one, again, Cersei's still scheming.

If I had to guess how the TV series will end, my guess is that the Night's King will be defeated, but Cersei will win the Iron Throne. It would fit the producers' description of a "bittersweet ending," in that Westeros is saved, but is still a shithole. We've had some forshadowing of this, with Jaime asking Olenna "when the people are living in the world Cersei created, will they ring their hands over how they created it?" I'm betting that Dany dies along the way (also forshadowed by her refusing to discuss succession with Tyrion until she actually sits on the throne), possibly Jon as well (maybe his 'extra life' expires once Rhllor is done with him), Sansa will rule the North, but be subservient to the Iron Throne (or maybe the North will retain its independence - or, Sansa could die and Jon could rule). In the show and books, we've seen time and time again that the people who get ahead are those who can plan/backstab/scheme the best, and at this point in time, Cersei seems to have the most concrete plan.

Course, that's just my guess. If I'm right, great. If I'm not, I won't lose any sleep over it.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
I never really got into Game of Thrones. Watched a few episodes here and there. Just seems like a bunch of really stupid people determined not to make friends or be reasonable, arguing over who get to sit in a chair and...I guess be ruler by right of the biggest chair?!?
Like I know Cerise is this queen ***** character, but no one likes her, and i don't get why any guard, solider, or whore takes orders from her, let alone how she's a great ruler.
Dragon girl is...there? She seems like a very empty character. She has dragons and a bunch of dudes so...cool? But she doesn't want to use the dragons or dudes to win so...cool? There was that one time she fought zombies for a few minutes in episode 67 of 67. That was cool for 2 minutes, make no mistake!
The little guy is funny! He's the only one who seems to know how stupid everyone is!
Jon snow! I remembered his name! He's cool! He likes to stab zombies! That makes him cool, and in keeping with the sword/sorcery theme GoT claims to have.

Still haven't seen any dwarves, elves, demons, goblins, or Orks yet. Saw a few dragons a few times. Then one got 360 no-scoped by a zombie king. Pretty cool that. Reminds me of my DnD days...

Still don't get how this is more popular than a skyrim porn mod, but there ya' go.
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
Hawki said:
Game of Thrones isn't inherently going to have any of these issues. Unless cast members are lying, the ending's been planned well ahead of time. Unless a Crucible equivalent is suddenly introduced, we don't need to worry about that - we've had seven seasons to see how the White Walkers work, how they came into being, and know that if the Night King is killed, they all fall (or they could be overcome with brute force by the combined armies of Westeros - the Reapers couldn't). And I doubt that GoT will just stop dead like ME3 originally did.
To me, GoT is headed the same way as Mass Effect 3 because of what Shamus Young described in his massive Mass Effect Retrospective [http://s720653790.onlinehome.us/twentysidedtale/?p=27792], namely what Young called Story Collapse. There isn't a single point of failure in GoT, but it has definitely gone from an adaptation of a details first book series that took great pains to keep those details in towards a more drama first approach, which has caused a divide within the fandom. This is exactly what happened throughout Mass Effect. Let me give you an example: In GoT season 1 a few episodes were spent just establishing that traveling from Winterfell to King's Landing was a long, arduous journey that required planning and some diplomatic savvy due to the location of the Frey's main hold. In Season 2-4 this was further established by the travels of Jaime, Brienne and Arya which all showed us just how vast Westeros was and how far apart everything was. Then came season 7 and we had people teleporting from King's Landing to the Wall. We had a fleet that somehow existed on both the west and east coast of Westeros at once to intercept two different fleets in what was shown to be chronologically back to back blows. We had Jon Snow invent jet flight (presumably) so that the plot could take him all across Westeros [https://blogs-images.forbes.com/erikkain/files/2017/08/got-map.jpg] in two seasons while the White Walkers made the weirdest detour ever.

This is story collapse. This is the show slowly making more and more decisions that takes it from its' roots in details first towards drama first. Drama first is fine, but when you end up violating the rules you set up for your own story it creates a domino effect that bodes ill for ending your story.

Now, I could go on about similar examples of how drama first has created stupid plots in GoT (The "Ramsay rapes Sansa because the show writers really wanted to keep the Jeyne Poole plot despite excising the character"-plot anyone?) and keeps creating stupid plots, contrivances and scenarios just because the writers thinks it is dramatic or cool, not because it makes sense in the universe of their fiction.

So yeah, I absolutely think that GoT will end up like ME3, because D&D are obviously not competent to expand upon the stories that Martin began to tell and due to this lack of competence they've already violated the integrity of the in-universe consistency of GoT.

As for ASoIaF? I think it will be fine. Martin might be plodding in his writing, but if he ever finishes, I think he has enough of a clue to wrap it up decently.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,173
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Gethsemani said:
In GoT season 1 a few episodes were spent just establishing that traveling from Winterfell to King's Landing was a long, arduous journey that required planning and some diplomatic savvy due to the location of the Frey's main hold. In Season 2-4 this was further established by the travels of Jaime, Brienne and Arya which all showed us just how vast Westeros was and how far apart everything was. Then came season 7 and we had people teleporting from King's Landing to the Wall. We had a fleet that somehow existed on both the west and east coast of Westeros at once to intercept two different fleets in what was shown to be chronologically back to back blows. We had Jon Snow invent jet flight (presumably) so that the plot could take him all across Westeros [https://blogs-images.forbes.com/erikkain/files/2017/08/got-map.jpg] in two seasons while the White Walkers made the weirdest detour ever.
On those points:

-Season 7 can give the illusion of Westeros having suddenly grown smaller, but the key word is "illusion." Every season is meant to take place over the course of a year. Season 1 spent a period of time getting to King's Landing. Season 7 doesn't show the travel time, but that doesn't mean that the travel time isn't occurring. However, at this point in the story, highlighting that travel time is far less important. The series has long since established approximate travel times, it doesn't need to remind us of it this late in the overall story.

-By fleet existing in two places, you mean Euron's? Him burning Yara's fleet and then the Unsullied ships isn't an issue as far as I can see. We don't know how much time passes between the two events, and there's nothing to say that he couldn't have split his fleet anyway - we know from the outset that he had the lion's share of the Iron Fleet.

-If we're talking about the penultimate episode and how quickly Daenerys gets there, then sure, I can go with that. However, I find it pretty minor in the scheme of things. The more telling issue (for me) is that the wights go from practically unstoppable (Hardholme) to being held off by a handful of heroes. I find that far more jarring than travel time.

I'll be honest, watching season 7 at this time of writing, I do feel it's one of the weaker seasons in the show (still good though). However, my main issue with it is pacing. The issue of congruence, while it has reared its head at times (see the above point), is secondary to the main issue in my mind.

Gethsemani said:
As for ASoIaF? I think it will be fine. Martin might be plodding in his writing, but if he ever finishes, I think he has enough of a clue to wrap it up decently.
I disagree it'll be "fine" to be honest. TBH, the books and the show have the opposite problems right now. Season 7's main issue is that too many things happen too quickly - there's a sense of rushing through to deal with certain plot points (e.g. Dorne and Highgarden), whereas in the past, these plots could have lasted a season by themselves. In contrast, the books have all the signs of bloat. Books 1-3? Pretty good. Then we get Feast for Crows, where the overall storyline just grinds to a halt to set up all new plot points. Dance with Dragons is a bit better, but the rate of storytelling still feels drastically reduced. If the show started going too fast by season 7 (personally I'd say that issue began with 6, it's just 7 that it becomes an issue), then the books started going too slow. And say what you will about the show, it at least will give us an ending (presumably).
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
Hawki said:
On those points:
I'll not quibble semantics and interpretations too much. Sufficient to say is that I chose to pick a few examples of the problems I had with season 6 and 7 and left out a lot of other problems with internal consistency.

Hawki said:
-Season 7 can give the illusion of Westeros having suddenly grown smaller, but the key word is "illusion." Every season is meant to take place over the course of a year. Season 1 spent a period of time getting to King's Landing. Season 7 doesn't show the travel time, but that doesn't mean that the travel time isn't occurring. However, at this point in the story, highlighting that travel time is far less important. The series has long since established approximate travel times, it doesn't need to remind us of it this late in the overall story.
I'd be much more inclined to accept this if the show actually cared about mentioning it once in a while. However Jaime can be in King's Landing, go pick up an army in Casterly Rock off screen, besiege and sack Highgarden and move all the spoils to just outside King's Landing, while Captain Sparr- Euron sails off to destroy Yara's fleet off of Dorne's West coast, sail back to King's Landing,
then sail around Westeros to Casterly Rock to destroy Grey Worm's fleet and return to King's Landing (never mind how he got into and out of King's Landing when the fleet had to pass Dragon Stone, which is in enemy hands, 4 times) all in the time it takes for Team Dany to hear about the loss of Yara's fleet, get a bit mad and then somehow conjure up a third fleet that can transfer all her Dothraki's from Dragon Stone to the inroads towards King's Landing to surprise attack Jaime.

I mean, I am just taking umbrage with distance and time here. But we could discuss how Euron had the majority of his fleet stolen from under him in S6E10 by Yara and somehow still conjures up a bigger fleet in what is essentially a few weeks at the most, on a bunch of islands that has no forests. We could discuss the absolutely inane strategy that Team Dany decides to employ to justify the chance for the Lannisters to destroy them piecemeal, instead of just going with the original plan of dogpiling King's Landing with absolutely superior numbers. We could discuss the utter stupidity of not sending three dragons to just destroy the Red Keep, "justified" by the poor logic of "innocent people will die", as if that's not the logical end point of a prolonged siege of a city of King's Landing's size. We could discuss the utter stupidity of no one objecting to the widely considered illegitimate Queen somehow getting away with blowing up the supreme leader of a cult that was played up as more powerful then the combined forces of the Tyrell's and Lannister's without no one in that cult even trying to get even or rallying people against this heretical queen. We could discuss Jon's absolutely baffling decision to go to a hostile throne pretender with all of maybe 5 bodyguards and an advisor instead of doing the smart thing and parleying on neutral ground. We can discuss the entirety of the Winterfell arc which goes nowhere (but in this case The Fandomentals [https://www.thefandomentals.com/winterhell-s7-retrospective-part-1/] got us covered [https://www.thefandomentals.com/winterhell-s7-retrospective-part-2/]) or the sudden turn of Arya's plot arc that is so weirdly handled that we can't be sure if we should consider her a dangerous psychopath or if we should be fistpumping her awesome when she murders every man of house Frey. We could talk about Sam's arc, which goes nowhere and only serves as a convenient plot device to further the plots of other people. Which, if we want to talk about it, is exactly the problem with Bran's arc, having him be reduced to an exposition machine that conveniently knows secrets that needs to be known for the plot to advance. We probably should discuss the utterly insipid plan and all the contrivances surrounding the "catch a white walker"-plot line and how it disrespects logic, time, distance and pretty much all the characterization of most people involved, all to convince a person that Team Dany should have put 6 feet under 8 episodes ago but didn't because the writers wanted the Lannisters around as big bads for the last season. We should probably also discuss the stupid shilling for Ramsay Bolton, his villain sue tendencies and how the plot bent over and broke so that his mustache twirling villainy could be played to the max, including breaking the characterization of other characters like Sansa and Stannis so that Ramsay could get his limelight.

All these things are the results of the writers diverging from Martin's details first approach in favor of drama first. Just like with Mass Effect 3 I feel the writing is already on the wall: The writers don't understand what made the first 4 or so seasons great (hint: Martin's writing and involvement) and are increasingly relying on maximizing drama to maintain tension while brute forcing their way through all the plot points they need to hit to reach their desired end, no matter how much of the characterization or internal consistency that has to be sacrificed to reach said end.

If D&D turns around and proves me wrong I'll be one happy camper, because I think GoT deserves better then the writing of the last 3 seasons. But at this point I've been hoping for like 2,5 seasons that GoT will return to form and it is increasingly obvious that it won't do that.