World Health Organization: Latest Ebola Outbreak Moving Too Fast to Control

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
It would be Ebola, some strains of that thing have wiped out small African communities.
THE END IS NIGH!
 

Smolderin

New member
Feb 5, 2012
448
0
0
This isn't enough to worry me but it is enough for me to keep a close eye on. I am in a heavily populated area and if this thing escalates further, I am getting the hell out of dodge no matter what the circumstances. I have always known that I could die in a multitude of ways but I am not going to let "virus" be one of them.
 

Avaholic03

New member
May 11, 2009
1,520
0
0
008Zulu said:
Before everyone locks themselves down in their bunkers, the numbers presented above are misleading. Lethality rate is not 90%, the Zaire variant is between 50 and 90%, with the next lethal variant being between 54 and 68%. The next lethal variant is sitting at 34%.

So enhance your calm.
Even 34% is still pretty bad odds when you're talking about lethality. People are rightly concerned about this. Don't minimize it just because it "only" kills between 1/3 and 2/3 of infected people.
 

Product Placement

New member
Jul 16, 2009
475
0
0
008Zulu said:
Before everyone locks themselves down in their bunkers, the numbers presented above are misleading. Lethality rate is not 90%, the Zaire variant is between 50 and 90%, with the next lethal variant being between 54 and 68%. The next lethal variant is sitting at 34%.

So enhance your calm.
And we're dealing with the Zaire variant, where it drops down to 50-60% mortality, provided that you're receiving proper care. That's still pretty extreme, considering that the Black Death "only" had around 33% mortality rate, back in the days of medieval healthcare and is recognized as one of the deadliest plague in known history.

The good thing about this disease is that you don't become infectious until you start showing signs and once that happens, you become sick so quickly that the window of infection is relatively short. Main reason why this epidemic is spreading so readily in the affected countries is the tradition of having your family take care of you instead of hospitals, which places all the family members at great risk, and funeral rites where people approach and touch the deceased.
yayforgiveaway said:
729/1300 ~= 0,56
That's 1300 infected, of those 729 are already dead. The remaining people haven't all recovered, so the full number of dead hasn't been realized.
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
The_Darkness said:
Worrying that I just went down with symptoms very close to those... Then again, I've recovered at this point, so I doubt that was it. (It was the worst that I've been ill for a long while though.)

On a more serious note, I do hope WHO catches up with this. An epidemic with a 90% mortality is the LAST thing we need.
An epidemic with a 100% mortality is the last thing we need. But at 90% this comes close :p
I would say a pandemic with a 100% mortality rate would be worse but then I'm just being pedantic.

OT: Not to self, stop eating dead orphans.
 

LazyAza

New member
May 28, 2008
716
0
0
How the fuck do enough people come in to contact with the bodily fluids of corpses to the point a virus outbreak spreads via this method. The hell is going on in these countries? >_>
 

Product Placement

New member
Jul 16, 2009
475
0
0
LazyAza said:
How the fuck do enough people come in to contact with the bodily fluids of corpses to the point a virus outbreak spreads via this method. The hell is going on in these countries? >_>
A long standing tradition of having your family take care of you, instead of going to hospitals.

Also, some tribes hold funeral rites, where you approach and touch the deceased, as a way to say goodbye (which has killed entire villages in the past), although the Ebola virus has caused allot of places to suppress that tradition.

You're also highly contagious, once you become sick, so healthcare workers often get infected, even when following basic quarantine rules, which makes this disease so hard to treat.
 

CrimsonBlack

New member
Mar 10, 2011
109
0
0
LazyAza said:
How the fuck do enough people come in to contact with the bodily fluids of corpses to the point a virus outbreak spreads via this method. The hell is going on in these countries? >_>
In the countries affected, ill people are cared for mainly at home, and not in hospitals, which are often basic compared to hospitals elsewhere. Contact with the individual's saliva, vomit, or other excretion is a huge possibility. This is also coupled with the notion that many with the disease will rather submit to the care of their family, and not go to a doctor. According to the Beeb, the number of infected is under-reported. Furthermore, general ignorance about the disease and it's transmission contributes to people being infected.

CAPTCHA: "I can fix it". No I can't! I study Immunology, but I ain't got no cure.
 

ToastiestZombie

Don't worry. Be happy!
Mar 21, 2011
3,691
0
0
Smolderin said:
This isn't enough to worry me but it is enough for me to keep a close eye on. I am in a heavily populated area and if this thing escalates further, I am getting the hell out of dodge no matter what the circumstances. I have always known that I could die in a multitude of ways but I am not going to let "virus" be one of them.
Same, I'm in Britain and if it reaches here and David Cameron doesn't stop upping breaking promises and hating on UKIP to shut down all flights from Africa (which is likely knowing him) I'm dropping everything and fleeing to my grandparents in rural Wales. I'm not taking the risk, I'd rather have a temporary setback to my education and social liife than die a horrible, painful death from a virus that would almost certainly infect my close family too
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
Irridium said:
Before everyone freaks out (a bit late but eh), the only way you can contract this is if you decide to come into direct contact with the person's bodily fluids.
Wrong, there is strong evidence for aerosol transmission I.E microscopic particles of virus fluid spread through the atmosphere. It lodges in the nasal cavity and/or lungs and can infect the host from there, its still consider direct contact rather than "airborne" but the fact remains you can have an infected victim pass through an area exhaling the virus and someone can pass through a few minutes after the person has left and potentially catch the virus.

Source [http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121115/srep00811/full/srep00811.html]

This research shows how separated animals where infected without direct physical contact and shows the lungs and nasal membranes as the initial point of infection.
 

youji itami

New member
Jun 1, 2014
231
0
0
yayforgiveaway said:
729/1300 ~= 0,56
729 dead of 1300 infected so far. Also according to the WHO it's 1440 cases with 826 dead.

Remember the infected figure doesn't mean those people have recovered it just means they haven't died yet.
 

Defective_Detective

New member
Jul 26, 2010
159
0
0
The needless alarmism and apocalyptic doom-saying in this article is ridiculous... I shake my head in shame at the standard of journalism here.
 

Brian Tams

New member
Sep 3, 2012
919
0
0
Wow, there are days that I thank my lucky stars that I was born in a 1st World Country like the U.S., where our most serious health problem is people eating too much.

This is horrible for the people in Africa. I really hope WHO can get a handle on this.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
Product Placement said:
And we're dealing with the Zaire variant, where it drops down to 50-60% mortality, provided that you're receiving proper care.
Except there is no cure or treatment available, the most they can do is pain management.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Africa just can't catch a break. ;___;

LazyAza said:
How the fuck do enough people come in to contact with the bodily fluids of corpses to the point a virus outbreak spreads via this method. The hell is going on in these countries? >_>
They don't have to be dead. Kissing sick relatives goodbye, cleaning up vomit, feces and blood (which is done by family members, since there isn't an abundance of nurses out there), touching a sick person with poor hygiene... all the normal stuff will infect you. And post-mortem, you still have to move and bury a dead body that had significant "external bleeding".
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
008Zulu said:
Product Placement said:
And we're dealing with the Zaire variant, where it drops down to 50-60% mortality, provided that you're receiving proper care.
Except there is no cure or treatment available, the most they can do is pain management.
...and cleaning up the various fluids the patient expels to avoid further skin decay. And providing optimal nutrition. And trying to bring down the fever. All of these will help stop someone from dying.
 

Evrant-Knight

An Interloper
May 5, 2010
2,615
0
0
Bristol
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Chessrook44 said:
Hoo boy... methinks perhaps I should start looking at tickets to Madagascar. Then again they've probably already closed their borders..... bah.
Personally I'd recommend Greenland myself, unless it's upgraded it's cold resistance, then we're all screwed.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
AstaresPanda said:
And America brings back 2 ppl to treat them. Not to be a dick but thats a pretty dam high risk.


OT: Still, that's the thing that always gets me about these lethal-as-hell diseases. If they're the deadliest whatsit ever, they SHOULD be burning out first.
 

Matthew Lynch

New member
Jun 26, 2010
107
0
0
Ok...I'm gonna say what I said in the facebook comments. This article on NYC is a: out of date already (BBC have already covered this a few days earlier) and b: it is NOT as the NYT are reporting, causing a 90% fatality. The WHO have said its closer to 55-60%.

Also...the two american doctors are already in the US and are receiving treatment at a facility designed to handle cases like theirs.

While there is no current cure of vaccine, what the article has not mentioned that alot of other sources including the BBC have, is that the US are going to field test a possible vaccine in september.

Whoever wrote that for thw NYT should be fired for causing un-needed alarmism and bad journalism.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Chessrook44 said:
Hoo boy... methinks perhaps I should start looking at tickets to Madagascar.
I don't think that movie is in theaters anymore.