lacktheknack said:
HG131 said:
Pirate Kitty said:
HG131 said:
I think someone should hit-and-run the killer. But don't kill him. Grab him and torture him. Killing a person, unless they REALLY deserved it (which this woman did not) is something deserving of pain to levels we can't imagine.
Hypocritical, much?
So, it's okay to run over a person on purpose and torture them because they accidentally killed someone. But it's not okay to run over someone accidentally and flee.
Amazing logic!
OT: People die every day. I see no reason to make special note of this individual.
Because as we all know, you have a psychic link with the killer and know it was an accident, right?
Good Lord, whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
Also, if you really think that most hit-and-runs are premeditated or purposeful acts of violence, you need to watch less TV.
Look, I was just calling Kitty out on assuming the intentions of the person. I know it was most likely an accident, but that doesn't give them the right to go around and kill people because "Whoops, I didn't mean to!". Is that supposed to make it all better? That they didn't mean to? And don't worry, I'm fine with innocent until proven guilty (even if in most people's minds it's "Guilty if I say so and people are morons for not agreeing with me"). I'm saying find out who killed her and then do this.