World of Warcraft Legion Initial Thoughts - Give Us A Reason To Log In Again

John Keefer

Devilish Rogue
Aug 12, 2013
630
0
0
World of Warcraft Legion Initial Thoughts - Give Us A Reason To Log In Again

With the announcement of the new World of Warcraft expansion, Legion, we gathered a few of the staff who play to get their reactions to what has been revealed so far.

Read Full Article
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Josh Vanderwall:
New Classes are always exciting, but a little displeased with the fact that Demon Hunter class is labeled a "melee" character. I recognize that it's a different universe than Diablo, but it's still a bit weird.
...alright, he at least acknowledges that the Diablo universe is indeed different than the WoW universe...but does Josh realize that WarCraft III came out long before Diablo III? And that WCIII contains the melee hero for which this new class is based off of?

I think Josh is a bit weird. :p
 

tzimize

New member
Mar 1, 2010
2,391
0
0
The only thing I care about is that they dont make illidan a villain again. If we have to kill him one more time my head will explode in bloody bits from pure rage.

Either make him a neutral rogue, or give him the redemption story he sorely deserves.
 

Shane Ledford

New member
Mar 24, 2010
6
0
0
All the confusion over Demon Hunter being a melee class makes me question how much these people actually know about WoW lore. I'm only vaguely aware of the most of it and I know what a Demon Hunter is in the WoW universe and not surprised at all about it being melee.
 

seule

New member
Jul 21, 2008
113
0
0
Yeah, every comment about "demon hunter, melee?" made me wonder who thought these guys were any kind of authority to talk to about WoW. Every Demon hunter you come across in WoW is melee. The golden boy of evil demon hunters was a boss that wielded two legendary 1-handed swords.

Makes it hard to take any of the comments seriously when there seems to be a large disconnect in knowledge about something that has been one of the most prominent MMO's of the past decade.

Appreciate the idea though. It's sort of getting to make or break time for Blizz. Another poor expansion and drop off in numbers and the money men will start cutting back on development costs because it's not as profitable as other properties, and we all know where that spiral ends.
 

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
0
TBH Escapist, you failed to get a panel of "experts" talking about WoW's announced expansion. There's a plethora of folks on various sites who have knowledge of both lore and the game mechanics, Perculia from wowhead alone comes to mind, and I'm positive at least one of the various folks who knew their shit wouldn't have had a problem answering questions.
Your assembled team honestly read like a few people who'd had a passing interest in WoW maybe a few years ago but never bothered to learn the intricacies of lore (the Demon Hunter/Diablo III gaffe alone spoke volumes) and it makes for an overall useless piece to read for people who actually care about WoW.
Those who don't wouldn't know or care, but the people you're targeting with this article are not going to be happy with its content. Overall Escapist, I am wholly disappointed in you for not vetting the interviewees.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
6,908
619
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
To quote Illidan from HotS (because someone has to do it)

"What do you mean monks were out before demon hunters? Monks aren't even a real hero class!"

But anyway, I don't play WoW (played the RTS games though and followed the lore through WoWpedia), but all in all, this looks like an interesting trip.
 

zerragonoss

New member
Oct 15, 2009
333
0
0
Imperioratorex Caprae said:
TBH Escapist, you failed to get a panel of "experts" talking about WoW's announced expansion. There's a plethora of folks on various sites who have knowledge of both lore and the game mechanics, Perculia from wowhead alone comes to mind, and I'm positive at least one of the various folks who knew their shit wouldn't have had a problem answering questions.
Your assembled team honestly read like a few people who'd had a passing interest in WoW maybe a few years ago but never bothered to learn the intricacies of lore (the Demon Hunter/Diablo III gaffe alone spoke volumes) and it makes for an overall useless piece to read for people who actually care about WoW.
Those who don't wouldn't know or care, but the people you're targeting with this article are not going to be happy with its content. Overall Escapist, I am wholly disappointed in you for not vetting the interviewees.
Who ever said anything about a panel of experts? They said right up front that these are just the wow players from around the office.
 

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
0
zerragonoss said:
Imperioratorex Caprae said:
TBH Escapist, you failed to get a panel of "experts" talking about WoW's announced expansion. There's a plethora of folks on various sites who have knowledge of both lore and the game mechanics, Perculia from wowhead alone comes to mind, and I'm positive at least one of the various folks who knew their shit wouldn't have had a problem answering questions.
Your assembled team honestly read like a few people who'd had a passing interest in WoW maybe a few years ago but never bothered to learn the intricacies of lore (the Demon Hunter/Diablo III gaffe alone spoke volumes) and it makes for an overall useless piece to read for people who actually care about WoW.
Those who don't wouldn't know or care, but the people you're targeting with this article are not going to be happy with its content. Overall Escapist, I am wholly disappointed in you for not vetting the interviewees.
Who ever said anything about a panel of experts? They said right up front that these are just the wow players from around the office.
Hence the quotation marks. I'd just think they could have assembled better people to interview for an article discussing the future of WoW and what it would take to really draw and retain subscriptions. I'm a veteran from beta and minus about a year and a half spread across WoW's existence (mostly in-between expansions during the doldrums) and I have my own ideas of what would draw me back to sub and retain that sub for the expansion's life cycle but in a professional article, I'd prefer a panel of real experts. Or if they're going the other route, I'd ask the community and do an 8-things post. But this article sets up an expectation of expertise and not a couple people who played/used to play and aren't knowledgeable enough to really be considered experts.

Usually Q&A sessions are done with people who know the field the questions will be coming from fairly well and this article sets up that expectation and fails. Its why I'm disappointed. I expected better from Escapist.
 

Shinkicker444

New member
Dec 6, 2011
349
0
0
Wow these guys lost pretty much all credibility with the lack of knowledge about Demon Hunters being melee, every single Demon Hunter in WoW is melee, and one of the most popular WoW characters is Illidan, a Demon Hunter with two kick ass blades (that I STILL can't get the main hand to drop). That's pretty facepalm worthy.
 

Incomer

New member
Sep 15, 2009
110
0
0
RJ 17 said:
Josh Vanderwall:
New Classes are always exciting, but a little displeased with the fact that Demon Hunter class is labeled a "melee" character. I recognize that it's a different universe than Diablo, but it's still a bit weird.
...alright, he at least acknowledges that the Diablo universe is indeed different than the WoW universe...but does Josh realize that WarCraft III came out long before Diablo III? And that WCIII contains the melee hero for which this new class is based off of?

I think Josh is a bit weird. :p
Yeah pretty much lost the incentive to read beyond that point. Who are they even talking to? >_<
 

Broderick

New member
May 25, 2010
462
0
0
Aside from the aforementioned confusion about the "Demon hunter" class, I agree mostly with what they say. I would say I am cautiously optimistic about the new expansion.Things look cool, but until we see it in action, I cannot say for certain one way or the other whether it will be the saving grace WoW needs to stop the hemorrhaging of subs and actually gain some back. WoD did good at the beginning, but dropped the ball hard.
 

InsanityRequiem

New member
Nov 9, 2009
700
0
0
Everything I've seen and heard of Legion makes me feel as if the expansion is nothing but a wrap up expansion. Get all the lore, plot holes, etc from before MoP wrapped up finally. To me, Legion should have been the expansion before MoP. At least have Garrosh lead the Horde against an external threat (Legion) before, after defeating them, and the destruction Azeroth was embroiled in, leaving diminished resources, leads to Horde/Alliance fighting. Which would be when MoP comes into play, then we go back in time to WoD and all that time interference stuff.
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
Besides the whole demon hunter gaffe(not to say I wouldn't like a new ranged class. Seriously, three new classes and no ranged dps?), I'm also astounded by their confusion in revisting the Legion. The Legion has been telegraphed as a near-future expansion for the last two expansions. Also, I find their second to last QA telling of the struggle of what Blizzard is balancing. So many people want a return to reinforcing the social aspects of the game, but so many more just want to do it themselves.

Side note: The host during the reveal annoyed the shit out of me.

Side note 2: I actually miss Metzen now. The host and presenters had the charisma of a wet blanket.
 

Travis Fischer

New member
Feb 1, 2012
126
0
0
Shane Ledford said:
All the confusion over Demon Hunter being a melee class makes me question how much these people actually know about WoW lore. I'm only vaguely aware of the most of it and I know what a Demon Hunter is in the WoW universe and not surprised at all about it being melee.
This. What in the Hellfire Peninsula are these people talking about? Do they think the Twin Blades of Azzinoth are projectile weapons?

"Drrrrrrr. Why is this class that uses twin swords a melee class? I can't figure it out!"
 

Karadalis

New member
Apr 26, 2011
1,065
0
0
"Resident WoW players"... Keep thingies? You mean the Garrisons right? Confused about demon hunters being a melee class despite them being melee fighters since warcraft 3? Comparing WoWs demonhunter to diablos demonhunter?

Mr Vanderwall.. i am disapoint.

As for the expansion:

I hope its not going to be iron horde 2.0... the epitome of ineptness... those guys where such a nonthreat... getting their shit kicked in by a lonely hero and a little garrison.. against the united orc clans of draenor! Well established too and with a massive amount of man(orc)power and resources while we are more or less cut off from Azeroth...

Sure they said we would be shocked and bad things will happen at first... but i doubt the legion will put up much of a fight lore wise. After all Guldan will be killed off in the first Raid of the entire expansion.

Makes one wonder if they will kill off green jesus...
 

Vanished

New member
Jul 5, 2014
36
0
0
Karadalis said:
Makes one wonder if they will kill off green jesus...
Will it matter if they do? Nothing stays dead in warcraft anymore. Heck, we could bring ghosts on as followers in our garrison that could take on battles and help manufacture goods the same as everyone that was still alive. It wouldn't surprise me if they wedged Kael'thas back in somewhere.
 

Jaeke

New member
Feb 25, 2010
1,431
0
0
Josh Vanderwall:
New Classes are always exciting, but a little displeased with the fact that Demon Hunter class is labeled a "melee" character. I recognize that it's a different universe than Diablo, but it's still a bit weird.

I mean... seriously? And this guy works for a GAMING website?

Geeze, if you don't even know what you're talking about at least be upfront about it and don't act like you do.

As for me... WoD just wasn't quite enough to pull me back in. Of course, who cares, I gave them the money for it. But still, after a month or so I, and while I did really enjoy the 90-100 leveling experience, I couldn't find a reason to log back in. Between the broken PvP system going on right now (Alliance have an unbelievable advantage), barebones raiding schedule and whatnot, I'm just having the same feelings I had when I quit in the first place back when Cataclysm released: It's just not the same game I played the first time around.
 

Naldan

You Are Interested. Certainly.
Feb 25, 2015
488
0
0
Jaeke said:
It's just not the same game I played the first time around.
Would you've prefered the exact same content all over again? I mean this without any sarcasm.

I think WoW should have evolved and expanded on its strengths, and for once keeping promised features. I quit at a similar time for similar reasons, but I don't think that it shouldn't have evolved.

Which it did, a bit. But in the most wrong way, except that it didn't go F2P, yet.

I'm curious, would you have kept playing if they, let's say, released 4 raids on release, 8 5-man-dungeons, more of the same BGs? I was asking that myself and I think I would have quit anyway, just a little later probably.

edit: I mean per expansion.
 

Karadalis

New member
Apr 26, 2011
1,065
0
0
Naldan said:
Jaeke said:
It's just not the same game I played the first time around.
Would you've prefered the exact same content all over again? I mean this without any sarcasm.

I think WoW should have evolved and expanded on its strengths, and for once keeping promised features. I quit at a similar time for similar reasons, but I don't think that it shouldn't have evolved.

Which it did, a bit. But in the most wrong way, except that it didn't go F2P, yet.

I'm curious, would you have kept playing if they, let's say, released 4 raids on release, 8 5-man-dungeons, more of the same BGs? I was asking that myself and I think I would have quit anyway, just a little later probably.

edit: I mean per expansion.
The problem i see with WoW right now is they stupefied the game to the lowest common denominator.

EVERYONE is the same... and with this expansion this will even be more painfully obvious because now EVERYONE of a given spec will have the same bloody weapon... and ofcourse there will be an obvious spec for your weapon too since blizz is uncapable of balancing their own game... wich is strange if you take a look at starcraft and the balancing job they do there.

You basically do not take any decisions anymore with your character, everythings streamlined, everythings made "easier", there is only one specific way to play your spec because everything was eliminated... i remember the days of vanilla WoW where my arms warrior was all about agility for ludicrous crit burst sprees XD

Ah.. how i miss the days of WotLK, thats when WoW was at its finest i think. Nowadays the game feels more like a used car salesman then anything else and WoD showed the lack of passion blizzard has for WoW.. rushed, content cut, abandoned before the last (and sadly only) content patch...

It doesnt help either that for the most part you have been the janitor for the big heros cleaning up their messes up to this point. Killstealing lore characters like green jesus and Kadgar are suddenly front and center after you and your teammates have risked your lives to bring the big bad down.. with them hogging all the glory in cutscenes...