Worst Games of the year
- Thread starter agentorange98
- Start date
80Maxwell08 said:
i played it and am rather liking it. not nearly one of the best games not even close but not hard to play for me. though i feel your pain cause its not for everyone
OT: hmmm...well i actually havent played any bad games this year... especially since i have barely played any games released this year. if gaming as a whole this year is taken then two worlds 2 is my worst. sure it wasnt released this year but it was the worst game i played this year...but if you hasd to tie my hands together and force me to sya the game i have had the least ammount of fun with this year that was released this year it would probably be hyperdimmension neptunia...contradictory to my earlier post but i am having tons of fun in skyrim,Infamous 2, modern warfare 3, ico and shadow of the collosus collection, and then finally that game in 5th. yeah i didnt really get many games released this year all of those games i found good but hyperdimmension neptunia is the least fun of the five even though its still a lot of fun.
Oh, it won an award on you're clearly unbiased and recognized list?Iblan said:
I take back everything I said.
I'd certainly hope not.SecretNegative said:
Bastion had a beautifully unique soundtrack, a sexy smooth narrator, and a pretty good story.
Said reviewer best be trollin'.
no, i paid 120 dollars to play it on 360. The headphones broke after being switched on once (and the autotuner never worked in the first place), the game is fantastic... in its cutscenes.blokrokker said:
Out of the games that have come out this year, that I've played, I can honestly say that I really, really liked them all.
Brink seemed like a total flop also Dragon Age 2.
Not bad games but fell very far short of what I was expecting.
Not bad games but fell very far short of what I was expecting.
Worst game is a tricky subject.
It's easy to find some one-man non-functional browser game, but that doesn't really matter to anyone.
It has to be a game that people cared about for it to really matter that it was bad.
In that regard, Dragon Age: II was the worst game of the year.
It's easy to find some one-man non-functional browser game, but that doesn't really matter to anyone.
It has to be a game that people cared about for it to really matter that it was bad.
In that regard, Dragon Age: II was the worst game of the year.
I know i am not gonna win any popularity contests but I will say it anyway...Skyward Sword. The art style, characters, visuals, story were not the problem. The wii motion plus did the impossible and made the wii motion controls even shitter. While the game is not terrible(I would rate it 7/10), playing it to the end felt like an absolute chore and was not fun for me.
Medal of Honor was utter shit. And I know it's not this year's game, but Far Cry 2 is possibly the single most worst game I have ever played in my entire life.
While amusing, in a drunken fratboy kinda way, the list linked in the OP is more than slightly schitzoid. More importantly, there is a massive difference between legitamitely awful games and say, just average. Or games that were personal let downs.
As an example, a few games from 2011 that are just terrible would include the likes of Brink, Hunted: The Demon's forge and say Call of Juarez. These games all showcase what not to do in a game. From bad gameplay and wretched mechanics to terrible AI, just to name a few things.
Games that were just avergage, meaning they are playable, the core mechanics are solid and perform exactly as advertised would include, Gears 3, MW3, AC:R, Crysis 2, Dragon Age 2 and yes Skyrim. Average doesn't mean they are bad just average. Tbh, I've personally been refering to 2011 as the year of average games and sequels.
As an example, a few games from 2011 that are just terrible would include the likes of Brink, Hunted: The Demon's forge and say Call of Juarez. These games all showcase what not to do in a game. From bad gameplay and wretched mechanics to terrible AI, just to name a few things.
Games that were just avergage, meaning they are playable, the core mechanics are solid and perform exactly as advertised would include, Gears 3, MW3, AC:R, Crysis 2, Dragon Age 2 and yes Skyrim. Average doesn't mean they are bad just average. Tbh, I've personally been refering to 2011 as the year of average games and sequels.
I can't have a wrong opinon is the only thing to say here, since you just said it. I didn't enjoy then, on a national level, then yeah, the games are great and deserve their love and ETC. However, I didn't enjoy Call of Duty, was overly generic, didn't enjoy much about Battlefield, and Skyrim was meh.JoesshittyOs said:
I'm not either, I just didn't enjoy them, and I'm just stating my opinion, such as you are by saying you like X movie or hate X game, I can't stop you from thinking like that, why try to continue this?
*"Are you fucking kidding me?" face*Frostbite3789 said:
I said GTA IV was "realistic", UNLIKE SR2(and 3).
"(...)some people actually liked Saints Row 2 for filling in the supposed 'gap' that GTA IV left because instead of being unrealisticaly fun(like San Andreas) it decided to be more 'realistic'(...)"
Here, I meant that GTA IV took the more realistic approach, not SR. The SR series are the complete opposite of realism. Also, they're the complete opposite of making sense as well.
Dude...chill out man. It is an opinion, and written as such. So yes, it is biased, in fact, I addressed the fact that I only play PC games. I'm not sure what your problem is though. I would say it might have something to do with your face resembling Justin Bieber's, but it seems roughly half of the people on the forum suffer from that problem...JoesshittyOs said: