i didn't say they didn't matter, i said they are not needed, there are other alternatives even if they are crap, im just sick of hearing dedicated server this, dedicated server that.Treblaine said:Nope, dedicated servers DO matter. It's like saying "I don't need a car, I can just cycle everywhere"arc1991 said:here we go again with dedicated servers, seriously, they are not needed for online gaming at all their are other alternatives.
and yeh Sony isn't big on online gaming are they? *looks up at news about MAG* hmmmmm...
im not a hater to either console, but id rather pay for my membership and know that what im paying for is worth it, than having something free tbh, cause anything thats free i see as not been as good as what you pay for (might not be Sonys case but you get my point)
For one, anything much beyond a 16 player cap is virtually impossible with user-hosted multiplayer and lag is a huge issue for everyone (especially with a crude matchmaking service) except the host who always has the lowest possible latency.
"id rather pay for my membership and know that what im paying for is worth it"
This just strikes me as a nasty case of cognitive dissonance, which in laymen's terms it's the condition of spending so much money/effort on something to the point of rationalising it to have more value than it actually does.
One thing you have to realise about XBL... just because Microsoft charges you to access it that doesn't mean the money you pay in any way has to be proportionally spent on the service.
anyway, im not one for arguing so im gunna shush before i say summit completely stupid and embarrass myself to the point i wont use this site again XD