You get to remove one word from the English language
- Thread starter Brendan Stepladder
- Start date
I choose just. I would like people to explain why things are ok other than saying it was for a "just" cause... Like Iraq for example. Explain Iraq without going into how it was a "just" war.
Why. Re-structuring everyones questions would be interesting.And it would stop annoying kids who just found out it was irritating to constantly question everything. It would also change philosophy.
feminism
So that anyone who would use the word then has to replace it by what they meant and we can see people's real stances instead of this hodge-podge meaning anything from anti-sexual to pro-women's rights to general equality. then when we see these threads all over the place around here, we can see what the real intent is in each one.
So that anyone who would use the word then has to replace it by what they meant and we can see people's real stances instead of this hodge-podge meaning anything from anti-sexual to pro-women's rights to general equality. then when we see these threads all over the place around here, we can see what the real intent is in each one.
Politically-correct.
Fine, not a word per-se, but goddamn that one is really pissing me off to no end.
Fine, not a word per-se, but goddamn that one is really pissing me off to no end.
I can just see some girl running through the forest in a slasher film screaming "I NEED AN ADULT! I NEED AN ADULT!"Smeggs said:
This made me smile. Thanks.
Given the choice, I'd pick trust. It can be the most important thing to anyone in the world, but it's so easily broken. Perhaps it's best that we dispose of it entirely...
"Pulsating", because I'm sick of lackwit journalists misusing it describe a sporting contest.
If you really wanted to screw with lawyers, at least in common law countries, remove the word "estoppel" and its derived forms from the language.
Watching lawyers try to articulate precise concepts and applications of estoppel without recourse to the actual word? Priceless.
We'd just swap to "attorney", "solicitor" or "barrister", instead. [/lawyered... although we'd lose that one...]Infernai said:
If you really wanted to screw with lawyers, at least in common law countries, remove the word "estoppel" and its derived forms from the language.
Watching lawyers try to articulate precise concepts and applications of estoppel without recourse to the actual word? Priceless.
Retarded
Simply because every time I use it to describe fox and EA news I feel I'm insulting mentally challenged people.
zing
no but seriously ill go with the word fergalicious. let's see you spell that word now Fergie, now that it doesn't exist .
Simply because every time I use it to describe fox and EA news I feel I'm insulting mentally challenged people.
zing
no but seriously ill go with the word fergalicious. let's see you spell that word now Fergie, now that it doesn't exist .