Your favourite war.
- Thread starter MaskedMori
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Generic was the wrong word to use... Hmm... Prominent would work better now that I think about it. Do you know why world war 1 started? Because one man from a country in Europe got assassinated in a coloney of that country. Mmm, every war for the USA since WW2 has been like that. Vietnam ended the way it did because the U.S. was stupid. Modern war is dull to me either way, it's probably the technology... No matter, war is going to have to be banned in this world sooner or later or it will be the end of us, of course, that wont happen.Chris^^ said:
Ridiculously evil? They weren't THAT evil, ridiculously evil would be much worse. Stalin started famines in other countries to bend them to his will, I'd say that's worse than genocide. When the Teutonic Order was started by Poland (Irony), they massacred Lithuania. Heh, come to think of it, the Teutonic Order resembles Nazi Germany very closely. Although I'd say the Order was more organized and uber than the Nazis. (No, I'm not saying Nazis are uber, they are boring in my eyes.) Still, that was the war that really inflated the US's ego.Citrus Insanity said:
I find the cold war to be least intresting because it was just a build up of weaponry. No tactics, no intresting battles, only manufacturing weapons. It's not even a war really, war wasn't declared, more of a muscle flexing contest between two countries, and Russia must have pulled somthing in the end.WhiteTiger225 said:
Wrong. There was a HUGE amount of strategy put into it. We basically kept marketing them weapons when they were building up to invade the united states after WWII. We marketed in such a way that before they knew it, their economy was utterly annihilated.MaskedMori said:
Read up on the cold war, it will also explain why we have an embargo with cuba.
Starving people is far worse indeed then murdering people across the globe, gassing jews, using jews for medical experiments, using their fat to make soap, using their bones to make buttons or marketing their skeletons to fund their war efforts to take over the world and wiping out anybody that didn't fit into their views of the master race.. yeah.. hitler wasn't that evil...MaskedMori said:
That was actually one of their generals that was using the Jews for medical experiments. Across the globe? It was in Germany and Poland, unless of course, you count the death toll of the war, but those are men that are ready to die. Starving people is far worse, because it's a lot more people, he starved entire countries. And massacred people in Ukrain.WhiteTiger225 said:
*Facepalms* right.. The nazis were only in poland and germany... They didn't attempt to invade Africa, they didn't take over france, they weren't making their way to britian who kept saying "Don't cross this line or we'll make anotherl ine and tell you not to cross it" the nazis didn't attack the russians... Next you are going to claim the hollocaust never happened >.<MaskedMori said:
And yes.. a NAZI general did those horrible medical experiments on living, awake jews...
alright i see what you were getting at there, a lot of people focus on it *guilty*, but the assassination of archduke ferdinand was a final trigger, there had been the buildup there for years, the assassination was just the straw that broke the camels back.MaskedMori said:
so true, ww2 was the last war where they did any real good, instead of just seeding a bloodbath, i wouldnt say modern wars were dull, just barbaric. assaulting developing countries with technologically superior forces, and wondering why they get trounced by guerilla tactics. look at the middle east, it'll never be won since they're essentially fighting the entire country, every insurgent killed creates an entire angry family happy to take up arms against the invaders. its exactly what happened in northern ireland. the british empirecould never control the middle east, how can america hope to do better?
in fairness, i dont see whats evil about using bodies after they are dead..WhiteTiger225 said:
but yes, the nazis were undeniably evil in the upper echelons at least, they were sadistic, murderous, psychopathic bastards.. but not all of them. there were many technological advancements under nazi leadership..
but i would argue that stalin was at least hitlers equal, ordering the massacres of far more of his own people than hitler did, any who opposed stalin were either executed or sent to gulags - forced labour camps. sound familiar?
stalin had far more blood on his hands than hitler did, but wasnt immediatly opposed because he was on the 'good' side.
but there are far more brutal organisations throughout history, some of which have already been mentioned. however the good/evil line is fairly prominent *IF* one isolates WW2 from context.
War always brings technilogical advancements... and experiments on dead bodies? Who said they were dead? They would cut open jews while they were alive and awake to test their poisons, gasses, and other chemicals to see how they worked on the human body. Hitler ordered the murders of far more people then Stalin. Did you never read the fuckin fact that Stalin's death toll Keeps jumping around from historian to historian? Ranging from 2 million directly accounted for rather then accounting those who died from neglect, to 120 million claimed by "Records" found that get quickly disproved? some claim 60 million, but again, theres no fact. Try searching "Stalin's death Toll vs Hitler's" And what do you get? Anti communist sights that are going to fear monger by making up statistics. And might I add, Stalin ALSO killing mostly his own people, while hitler was trying to rule the fucking WORLD.Chris^^ said: