I assume all of us are well aware what the actual reason for this is? Big corporations (Youtube included) and the government don't like having their videos looking bad from having a lot of dislikes.
This is cringe on the part of YouTube
I assume all of us are well aware what the actual reason for this is? Big corporations (Youtube included) and the government don't like having their videos looking bad from having a lot of dislikes.
Here's the thing though, they could just stop the dislike feature from effecting the algorithm.
Just for context. This move is meant to stop small creators from being targeted by cancellers who shower creator's videos they don't like with dislikes to fuck up the algorithm against the creator. Thus their videos will never get traction or make money.
I get the reason behind why. Im for the idea. But they went for the 'easiest cost effective solution.' Which means that its a blanket solution that probably won't alleviate the problem and cause other problems. Eg. I use the like/dislike ratio for 'How to' videos to help me determine if the creator knows what they are talking about
YouTube metrics treat likes and dislikes the same- they're both "engagement" and influence the algorithm to show the video to more people.Here's the thing though, they could just stop the dislike feature from effecting the algorithm.
Well, I don't really want an actual video that is actually disliked because it does a bad job to get on the feed over better quality videos. Like, that defeats any idea of meritocracy.Here's the thing though, they could just stop the dislike feature from effecting the algorithm.
Same. Without a dislike button I haven't got any sense of the ratio - if all there are is likes, it could mean millions of people saw the video but only a few thousand thought it was good, or it might be a very niche thing I'm looking at but a very good video.Eg. I use the like/dislike ratio for 'How to' videos to help me determine if the creator knows what they are talking about
I myself will suspect most upvotes to be faked due to bots and/or active meddling by Google (AKA, corporate favors). Just feeds more fuel to the propaganda machine, by totally removing signs of dissenting opinion.Same. Without a dislike button I haven't got any sense of the ratio - if all there are is likes, it could mean millions of people saw the video but only a few thousand thought it was good, or it might be a very niche thing I'm looking at but a very good video.
Views to like ratios are pretty useless for certain types of videos, especially for older ones.Okay, so the formal and informal metrics change from like:dislike ratio, to views:like ratio. This changes what, exactly?
It doesn't fuck up the algorithm by giving a thumbs down it's still engagement. Remember Friday by Rebecca Black still trended even with some of the most downvotes on youtube. he whole "Mass downvoting small creators" thing is more disparaging / discouraging to them than cancelling, hell mass downvotes can get you a boost in the algorithm.
Just for context. This move is meant to stop small creators from being targeted by cancellers who shower creator's videos they don't like with dislikes to fuck up the algorithm against the creator. Thus their videos will never get traction or make money.
I get the reason behind why. Im for the idea. But they went for the 'easiest cost effective solution.' Which means that its a blanket solution that probably won't alleviate the problem and cause other problems. Eg. I use the like/dislike ratio for 'How to' videos to help me determine if the creator knows what they are talking about
The true downside will be dangerous shit like 5 minute craft's numerous videos or some stupid scam bullshit being pushed not getting downvoted into oblivion so people who look down no longer see the mass dislikes that were an easy indictor the claims are bullshit or there craft advice is actually terrible. (For those who don't know 5 minute crafts have put out videos that are potentially dangerous to people or just bullshit)YouTube metrics treat likes and dislikes the same- they're both "engagement" and influence the algorithm to show the video to more people.
I'd bet a dollar to a bent dime that this is at the behest of corporations who don't like when the promotional video for their new whiz-bang product gets swamped with dislikes because the company selling the product is scum.
A 10 view to 1 like ratio is normally considered pretty good going. A 100 view to 1 like is more normal.Same. Without a dislike button I haven't got any sense of the ratio - if all there are is likes, it could mean millions of people saw the video but only a few thousand thought it was good, or it might be a very niche thing I'm looking at but a very good video.