which is why i said "Should" and not "is". Such contracts would not be enforcable in my country anyway though. Worker rights would superseed that part of contract.tangoprime said:Unless you signed a contract saying that it does, which as several people have noted, is pretty standard in the software industry. I have friends who work for JP Morgan Chase doing application development, and their employment contract has that language as well, basically anything they code while they're employed there belongs to the employer. I had that language in my contract when I worked for Microprose.Strazdas said:They shouldnt be. What i coded on my own time should not belong to the company, only what i did while im working for them.
Thank you for reading through the document and linking it. Indeed this looks like Zenimax has a case here and quite a significant one. i totally did not expect that.Lightknight said:Frankly... if this is all true, then we actually owe a significant amount of gratitude to Zenimax. snip
If you want me to read your posts in another thread it would be wise to link to said posts (unless they are quoting me, in which case i already get a notice in inbox).Adraeus said:No, the system has not failed. Read my posts in the other thread. While the assignment of inventions agreement can be abused, which is why some jurisdictions limit the enforceability of the agreement, the agreement provides employers with an essential legal recourse. In the event that contractors or employees subvert their relationship with their employer, and therefore their access to the employer's equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information, for their own ends, the employer can pursue a remedy.
I linked the thread in my first response to Pyrian [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/7.850620.21018248].Strazdas said:If you want me to read your posts in another thread it would be wise to link to said posts (unless they are quoting me, in which case i already get a notice in inbox).
Ah, not being Pyrian i did not saw it. But after glancing at it i remmeber reading it back when it was posted. I just did not associate it with you because usually i care about contents of the post and not the name attached to it.Adraeus said:I linked the thread in my first response to Pyrian [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/7.850620.21018248].Strazdas said:If you want me to read your posts in another thread it would be wise to link to said posts (unless they are quoting me, in which case i already get a notice in inbox).