Zero Punctuation: Gears of War 4

Onliuge

New member
Aug 9, 2012
22
0
0
Can't wait for the AAA games to fuck off so Yahtzee can review something half decent.
 

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Apr 23, 2020
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
Onliuge said:
Can't wait for the AAA games to fuck off so Yahtzee can review something half decent.
You do know that Yahtzee spends 90% of his time reviewing bad games, right? It's kind of his job.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
erttheking said:
Onliuge said:
Can't wait for the AAA games to fuck off so Yahtzee can review something half decent.
You do know that Yahtzee spends 90% of his time reviewing bad games, right? It's kind of his job.
Actually he spends 90% of his time reviewing games. They just happen to be bad because those are the only type of games being made these days.
 

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Apr 18, 2020
7,468
2,131
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
In a way, I'm kind of glad the AAAs are back. He didn't seem to have much heart in going after random indies for the past few months. AAA's provide so much to work with much of the time.

I can only imagine the BF1 v. CoD:IW is going to be interesting.
 

HumanShale

New member
Sep 23, 2016
21
0
0
I got some good laughs from that one, good episode, but I'm beginning to wonder if it's worth putting in the "grizzled white dude" complaint in every time it occurs in an action game.

May as well complain that every Big Mac Meal I get comes with fries. I think they do offer carrot sticks now as an alternative and I'd be willing to bet the sales figures on that aren't great.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
Only ever played the first Gears when it came out, and whilst incredibly enjoyable at the time - particularly in co-op - it never seemed like something which really had any reason to keep going.

HumanShale said:
I got some good laughs from that one, good episode, but I'm beginning to wonder if it's worth putting in the "grizzled white dude" complaint in every time it occurs in an action game.
If it remains drearily boring through lazy overuse, then yes, it is worth mentioning it just like any other bad or good thing in a given game/film/whatever.
 

normalguycap

New member
Oct 11, 2009
57
0
0
The end of this one really got to me. How do you make the artist's work noticeable? How do you make a game that doesn't force the player to look at a thing which is bad but also doesn't make them feel like they have to advance as fast as possible?


I do this a lot in games lately. Most of the time it's pointless to stick around and so you just go to the next set without seeing anything and somehow the experience as a whole feels hollow. Besides being an exploratory RPG thing, how can this be fixed?
 

Makabriel

New member
May 13, 2013
547
0
0
"How does the artist that painted that cobblestone feel about all their hard work..."

They probably sit around draining bottles of wine with the background artists for racing games.. How often have you -stopped- and checked out that scenery?
 

Transdude1996

New member
Mar 18, 2014
188
0
0
normalguycap said:
The end of this one really got to me. How do you make the artist's work noticeable? How do you make a game that doesn't force the player to look at a thing which is bad but also doesn't make them feel like they have to advance as fast as possible?


I do this a lot in games lately. Most of the time it's pointless to stick around and so you just go to the next set without seeing anything and somehow the experience as a whole feels hollow. Besides being an exploratory RPG thing, how can this be fixed?
That's the catch 22 of the entire problem. Outside of RPGs and strategy titles, games do not really use textures to point out anything important because you're mostly busy getting from point A to point B. However, ironically, whenever a developer gimps on the "life-like" textures, the first thing out of everyone's mouth is that the game looks bad, or is categorized as "last-gen" in look.

So, the way I see it, both ends are experiencing a problem no one can actually solve. You have the developers on one end spending all this money just to make sure the game looks good, so they end up having to divert finances that could have gone towards gameplay, story, etc. Then you have the consumers, on the other end, who complain about there being little to the game outside of the graphics, but are the first to criticize a game because it "looks bad" rather than actually playing the stupid thing.

Seriously, name a game in recent years that actually did well and didn't blow it's budget on the graphics.
 

JUMBO PALACE

Elite Member
Legacy
Jun 22, 2020
3,552
7
43
Country
USA
Well I expected Yahtzee to be hard on this game but didn't expect so much venom in the comments section. It was a funny review and yeah the campaign is pretty samey to the first 3 but I think Gears 4 is a lot of fun. I didn't dig the new characters at first but once I embraced the cheesiness I forgot was in Gears' DNA they started to grow on me. Seeing the guys from the first game that I spent so much time playing as and with was cool. It was clearly pandering to me as a fan but you know what, I'm fine with some good natured in jokes and fan service.

The multiplayer is as strong as ever with the unlock chests being the only seriously bad addition. New weapons are cool and punchy and it feels more balanced than ever between long ranged weapons and the shotgun duels that have always dominated the series. Couple all this with rock solid performance on PC and you've got a pretty good AAA release. If you're not into the series this game won't change that nor does it buck the trend of big budget AAA games in the single player; but Gears 4 as a game and the franchise itself has a lot going for it.

P.S. I weight train and practice power lifting so I enjoy the over the top action hero physiques. It's more like Arnold Schwarzenegger and friends gearing up to chainsaw their way through monsters. That's really how one should approach Gears I think. It's more like an 80s sci-fi action movie than a shooter to be taken too seriously.

normalguycap said:
The end of this one really got to me. How do you make the artist's work noticeable? How do you make a game that doesn't force the player to look at a thing which is bad but also doesn't make them feel like they have to advance as fast as possible?


I do this a lot in games lately. Most of the time it's pointless to stick around and so you just go to the next set without seeing anything and somehow the experience as a whole feels hollow. Besides being an exploratory RPG thing, how can this be fixed?
I think collectibles help with this. If there's hidden bits of lore or items to find players might take some time to explore the environment and look around at the world more.
 

Sheo_Dagana

New member
Aug 12, 2009
966
0
0
I'm not terribly surprised to see that Gears of War 4 exists and I'm sure they're establishing a new trilogy... because Xbox doesn't have much going for it in the way of exclusives, so it just seeks to revive old franchises and copy-paste them to fluff their library. Halo 5: Guardians was absolutely gorgeous, yet the characters felt sterile and hollow, going through the motions. Ironically, only the AIs had any personality. My expectations of Gears of War 4 are even lower.

The Gears games are fun to play, sure, and I do suppose that is the point of the game, but I have also feel like their stories have only existed to prop up the game and make them feel like they have some substance to them to attract more story-driven players like myself. Most people I meet who play these types of games either don't play the campaign at all or just skip all the cutscenes anyway. I guess that's why Judgement probably didn't bother with much.
 

Thanatos2k

New member
Aug 12, 2013
820
0
0
normalguycap said:
The end of this one really got to me. How do you make the artist's work noticeable? How do you make a game that doesn't force the player to look at a thing which is bad but also doesn't make them feel like they have to advance as fast as possible?
You put it in a non-linear action and/or adventure and/or RPG game that focuses on exploration, not just combat.
 

Bedinsis

Elite Member
Legacy
Escapist +
May 27, 2020
590
116
48
Country
Sverige
Transdude1996 said:
Seriously, name a game in recent years that actually did well and didn't blow it's budget on the graphics.
Xcom(ugly cutscenes) and Undertale(ugly even by pixel art standards).

Since you said "outside of strategy games" you might disqualify the former.

I've also heard complaints on the difference between cutscene and gameplay in Wolfenstein: The New Order being noticeable.
 

Kenjitsuka

New member
Sep 10, 2009
3,051
0
0
"And then Marcus Fenix carefully put the statue he had so lovingly carved into the only working Pod left on the planet, caressed it's face one more time and sent it into space, just as the planet exploded from under him for the last time. Much later it'd be discovered by some ponce on 'Earth' who claimed it as his own creation... but at least it got displayed in a museum for all to see. The End."

... you ARE supposed to write terrible fanfiction about the end credits, right? :O
 

Arnoxthe1

New member
Dec 25, 2010
3,374
0
0
OK, I'm not a big fan of GoW or even most modern AAA games at all, but even I think this review was really harsh. GoW4 is also, besides CoD, the only modern AAA game to have splitscreen, so it definitely deserves some points for that.

Also, if you're just passing from point A to B in a shooter without looking around at the map then that actually sounds like the artist's problem, not the players. Take Painkiller. Definitely some last-gen graphics thar but you still wanted to explore and see the map even though the shooting was more fast-paced and mindless than GoW. And it's especially surprising considering how many of the textures in Painkiller maps are reused. Now that right there was masterful level design.
 

Eri

The Light of Dawn
Feb 21, 2009
3,626
0
0
School-boards in the deep south? Jokes on you Yahtzee. It's been proven schools in the south are the most diverse of all.

https://youtu.be/o8yiYCHMAlM?t=43s
 

Mr_Jack

New member
Dec 2, 2009
13
0
0
The game had some nice stuff to look at but the way the setpieces were put together you didn't have a ton of time to actually sit there and look at the stuff. I mean, I tried a few times to walk around a bit to look at stuff here and there and grab collectibles, but overall you still missed the stuff in the distance or little details here and there because you just wanted to get moving after killing dozens of Locust.

Getting to the Locust, that whole thing just felt lazy. It wasn't fully absolutely established that they were lambent humans from 100 years previous, but that the sires were part of what made them into what they are now. It was fairly obvious in the first trilogy that the Locust must have been older than 100 years, and their current hierarchy was created 100 years before. Long story short, I felt that old origin would have been better than new origin. The story isn't set up for a 'hubris of man' arc, it's just blatantly told to you that man was dickish and made more problems than good. Hell, Adam Fenix had said that Imulsion probably came from off world fairly recently. The current story seems to be pretty much the prevailing fan theory put forward from the first trilogy rather than something a little more thought out. Like having these beings be what the Locust were before Imulsion, and now that it's gone long dormant strains of their 'infection' came back to life and started to repopulate their numbers by infecting humans. Making the Locust the demons of Seran mythology.

....I'm really overthinking this, but then again it just irks me they just sloppily slapped the reasoning together.

In any case, I actually burst out laughing when Marcus gruffly proclaimed "THE LOCUST NEVER DIED!".

Also Wolfenstein New Order/Old Blood was more film grainy and anti-aliased in cutscenes, not really a terrible downgrade to gameplay which was more crisp. People are just never satisfied unless their games are perfect in every way they want it to be, rather than what would make it really good. Games are getting delayed now to attain that 60FPS, 1080P/4K quality with perfect smooth graphics because people are complaining when they aren't. Even games that don't actually benefit from it.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
7,510
909
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Mr_Jack said:
Getting to the Locust, that whole thing just felt lazy. It wasn't fully absolutely established that they were lambent humans from 100 years previous, but that the sires were part of what made them into what they are now. It was fairly obvious in the first trilogy that the Locust must have been older than 100 years, and their current hierarchy was created 100 years before. Long story short, I felt that old origin would have been better than new origin. The story isn't set up for a 'hubris of man' arc, it's just blatantly told to you that man was dickish and made more problems than good. Hell, Adam Fenix had said that Imulsion probably came from off world fairly recently. The current story seems to be pretty much the prevailing fan theory put forward from the first trilogy rather than something a little more thought out. Like having these beings be what the Locust were before Imulsion, and now that it's gone long dormant strains of their 'infection' came back to life and started to repopulate their numbers by infecting humans. Making the Locust the demons of Seran mythology.

....I'm really overthinking this, but then again it just irks me they just sloppily slapped the reasoning together.
You're kind of all over the place there. That the Locust are former humans mutated by imulsion, with the sires being the evolutionary link, was established awhile ago. The first three games hinted at it, and a dev post outright confirmed that the Locust were former humans.

That said, I do prefer the idea of the Locust being their own species, the idea that Myrrah came to a pre-existing civilization rather than building it from the ground up. That's a hell of a lot of architecture down there, even for a century, and I do like the idea of the Locust being the 'truth behind the myth' for much of Sera's folklore, that it's only because of the Lambent that they launch an invasion, whereas in the past, they were content to remain in the Hollow. Still, even by GoW2, the signs were there.