Batou667 said:
What reputation? "That company that makes consoles with no games, and the games it does have are for kids.
Nintendo has a reputation among the laymans as kid oriented company that always puts out good quality games. After all15 games with most sales in history of gaming are nintendo [http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/] (16th place is finally breaking the chain with a microsoft game).
Meanwhile amongst people in the business Nintendo also has a reputation of beign ruthlessly xenophobic and abusing local laws to shut people off even if they operate under fair use.
ToastyMozart said:
Uh, erm... shit. Can't argue with (depressingly large) sales figures
I guess there's still the argument that people go to smartphones and dedicated handhelds for different experiences. I wouldn't whip out a 3DS for the sake of playing a quick game of Angry Birds, and trying to play SM3DL on a phone would be a nightmare, but people do have limited funds, so they might not be able to splurge on more than 1 item to pack into their pockets.[footnote] But seriously! who the fuck drops over $800 on a mobile game's in-app purchases?! You could buy a mid-tier PC or console AND a decent library with... I just... what... drugs... 1st degree financial irresponsibility... aasfhapondh! [/footnote]
Strazdas said:
Im jelous, my old machine can only do 11 turbotaxes per second, i need a new GPU!
Huh, that seems strangely low. It could be stuck running in 2D mode. Is the card heating up when you try, or does it just sort of sit there and refuse to move?
Failing that, try upping the intensity. Bump it up to around 15 to start, and tweak from there.
Yes, i would love if traditional gaming was the market leader however sale figures are sale figures.
The argument of idfferent reasons would not stand considering there we got a lot of people laying mobile games and paying money for them, so at least significant margin of people that buy smartphones for whatever reason also spend a lot on gaming, which makes the reasons people buy it moot as long as they game on them.
Limited funds view is very right here. If you have a choice of buying a phone you need and buying a handheld, or buying a phone you need anyway and just game on that, your likely chose the latter. thats the same reason PCs are on the rise. in order to game you gave to either buy a PC, or buy a PC you need anyway[footnote]during a recent study i read somewhere (dont remember the link now) it was determined that sudden disappearance of PC would cause more chaos than sudden disappearance of any other electronic device, people NEED pcs in their lives[/footnote] and thne buy a console on top. COupled with other benefots of PC gaming and loss of benefits of console gaming (the new generation really are simply PCs, but shit). So the obvious choice becomes PC for anyone that isnt doing it out of brand loyalty or other subjective reasons.
The 880 dollar mobile app purchase was over extended period of time. The story was that a guy would play a free to play game (if i remember it was called clash of clans) and he would drop 20 dollars on it every time he got paid for work. over time, it accumulated to him spending 880 dollars on a single game.
You could buy a high end gaming laptop for 880 dollars. I currently plan to buy one soon (760GTX, I5-4670, 8gb DDR3 1600 MHZ RAM) and its costs is 815 dollars and you have to take into account that computers in US is around 20-30% cheaper due to inflated costs here in eastern europe. For people not familiar with technical aspects - this one will play every game released to date with ease, games like BF4 will go on ultra settings at 1080p and 60 fps.[footnote]if i just want to beat consoles in performance a 400 dollar PC would suffice, so consoles arent even cheaper[/footntoe]
As for my turbotax numbers, i may need to buy that 8000 dollar water cooler and overclock my gpu to get taxes done faster obviously!
NuclearKangaroo said:
i dont care much about sales, the problem is the games, the PS2 era simply had so much more innovation, it was the age of the devil may crys, the gods of war, the GTAs, Shadow of the Colossus, etc
it always seemed to be something new and exciting and new ideas were constantly explored, this gen we got... DLC, microtransactions, and i guess spunkgargleweewee
i cant think of a single genre that was born this gen, except maybe music games, which incidentally also suffered a miserable death long before the gen was even finished
i can honestly say the most innovation came from PC this gen, specially towards the end, the indie revolution, digital distribution, kickstarter, free to play, i think the PS2 era games are still better, but there was certainly a turnaround when it comes to ways to deliver games to customers and the people making those games
PS2 era had GOOD GAMES. innovation is only supplementary. innovation for innovation sake gives you kinect. You may not care much about sales, but its all the companies like MS care about.
A genre born last generation? walking simulators (DayZ is a famous one). yes i know its supposed to be survival simulators. Also zombie genre pretty much came into power. Theres also a lot of actual real simulators out there that wasnt possible before. Physics based games. Destructible environment. plenty of good stuff last gen. This gen? too early to tell, the gen is only few months old.
PC has always been the birthplace of innovation. This is because PC is completely costumizable, this means people that want to experiment with new stuff will flock towards PC, and thus we get mroe innovative people with PCs. this is very evident in indie scene, where PC indies are quite innovative while xbox indies are mostly failed clones.
I, for one, think despite all the blunders like microtransactions and making patches cost money (and calling them DLC) gaming is still getting better. I may be naive, sure, but that is my opinion.
VG_Addict said:
I'm tired of asking this question over and over, but what's wrong with the Wii U's online, other than the account thing? I have never gotten a direct answer.
well, you can add region locking to that.
The_Kodu said:
Harder than patching a sealed disc with a fixed storage space which you can't add more content to ?
So you carry all your Data about on DVD's ? Or do you have an USB bar / data drive ?
You have piles of files on DVDs all on Spindles or do you have an extra hard drive to store things ?
Solid state storage isn't obsolete and solid state storage is the modern version of the cartridge.
i actually do have 660 DVDs and carry my data around in them. Data that needs constant changing is in cloud storage with automatic local backups into HDD on my home computer, but i dont "Carry it around". other data i carry on DVDs. The reason is simple - DVDs are much cheaper. Though as of last summer external HDDs are actualyl cheaper per gygabyte now, so i got myself an external HDD now.
SSD is still very uneconomical.
Aardvaarkman said:
(and yes, I too hope that Nintendo was watching)
Yatzee is very high profile person in gaming world. there certainly is someone at nintendo whos watching (probably a person responsible for watching all the popular internet personals about what they say about Nintendo). Now whether they will use it as advise or "this guy dislikes us so we must respond in kind" is a different thing. That is, if said person even tell others at nintendo about it.
The_Kodu said:
Unless of course companies wanted to use more than a disc allows them or to not have to compress things.
One of the main challenges facing 4K is storage space and while Blue ray allows the use of a finer laser but stepping up from HD to 4K will require vast amounts of extra storage space. While you could in theory make even finer lasers it would cause the problem that even a very fine scratch could break the game entirely. Heck a speck of dust could make the game unplayable.
Think how some games play off the hard drive. Imagine if it weren't an SSD drive but say a 100GB hard drive modifed to simply plug in. That would be quite cheap (1TB is about £60 now so 100GB would cost far less)
if you want storage space - HDDs are the way to go and SSDs dont even come close now.
Blue Rays are a dead end technology, it was never economically superior and only went around because blue ray discs were pushed for movies. It also really works on consoles till you stop the nonsense of playing off disc and admit that installing makes things better.
You are wrong about HDD pricing. Making 100 GB HDD and 1 TB HDD is pretty much the same cost now becasue tecnology has moved past 100 GB HDDs. They are sold cheaper now becasue everyone wants to get rid of the stock, since even 500 GB HDDs are being laughed at as too small.
Until we're all on 100GB/s systems then that's not happening.
Oh, please, 100mbps is completely fine for downloading games. we dont need GB/s unless you want to stream uncompressed 4k video, and lets face it thats not coming for at least 50 years. heck, our 1080p streaming is compressed so much that we would be better off watching uncompressed 480p (not an option though).
Unless you specially format a disc and place it in a disc writer then you can't add extra data to an optical disc either.
This is false. if burned with proper software and not out of space you can add data to extra space available on an optical disc.
Except it is the modern face of the gaming cartridge. The chips were just another means to store the data really.
Not it is not. SSD is not a cartridge. its as much a "modern face" as internet is modern face of DVDs.