Discuss and Rate the Last Film You Watched

Recommended Videos

Is this the first poll?


  • Total voters
    47

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,138
4,506
118
In retrospect, some of the old Arnie movies were legitimately very good, something that perhaps got overlooked in later years.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
7,407
6,562
118
Australia
In retrospect, some of the old Arnie movies were legitimately very good, something that perhaps got overlooked in later years.
Yeah but Conan the Barbarian isn’t one of them. That movie is legitimately good and was thought of as good on release. It’s been the gold standard for dark fantasy in cinema since it came out and I’ve yet to hear an opening track in any movie like it that comes close to as good as Anvil of Crom.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,065
4,775
118
Chaos Walking

YA dystopia thing with Tom Holland and Daisy Ridley. It's incredibly bland and generic but for a few peculiar conceits: it takes place on an alien planet where there're no women and men can hear and even see each other's thoughts. Effectively everyone's a visual telepath, projecting what they're thinking about. Tom Holland is the designated plucky farmboy, Daisey Ridley crash-lands in the nearby woods, and the two go on the run from a posse of angry males led by Mads Mikkelsen.

There's not much to the action (whenever you think you're getting a fight scene, the movie cuts away), or the chemistry between the two leads, or the half-assed world-building, or even the planet itself, which looks to me like any other overgrown meadow you get in The Walking Dead. The whole thing is so tediously unmemorable, and the whole "visible/audible thoughts" thing looks so ugly on screen, like an oil stain swirling over the actors' faces.

I also don't believe for a second that a teenage boy who's never seen a girl in his life would only think thoughts like "Her hair's so pretty" or merely fantasize about a chaste kiss. Realistically that kid would've been doggy-stylin' Daisy Ridley in his head the whole movie, and would've been screening it too, much to her character's chagrin. Maybe if Charlie Kaufman had written the movie, right? Well, he did. Then they scrapped his script. Unbelievable.

Apparently the movie was shot in 2017, then reshot in 2019, then released in 2021 after more than a few poor test screenings & COVID-related delays.

Kevin James.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias
Jun 11, 2023
4,257
2,952
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Yeah but Conan the Barbarian isn’t one of them. That movie is legitimately good and was thought of as good on release. It’s been the gold standard for dark fantasy in cinema since it came out and I’ve yet to hear an opening track in any movie like it that comes close to as good as Anvil of Crom.

I really, really hope King Conan delivers. Christopher McQuarrie is now at the helm and production is slated to start sometime next year. Gives Arnie some time to get in movie shape, for what could be a hell of a bookend to his action film career.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,065
4,775
118
Spinal Tap II: The End Continues

Well it was never going to be as good as the first one, was it? It's still a lot of fun. Like every legacy sequel it tries a little too desperately to recapture the magic but that premise fits Spinal Tap itself like a (smell the) glove. It helps that it's still being directed and co-written by Rob Reiner (RIP) and that all three main band members are back, never missing a beat throughout all their squabbles and grievances. All the jokes about them being has-beens are funny (they're cooped up in a ghost tour house weeks before ther big reunion gig; they do a photoshoot in a cemetery; later a promoter suggests one of them should die on stage to drive sales). The gags that try to one-up the original, not so much. There's also a bunch of walk-ons and zoom cameos with varying degrees of success. But the characters are endearing, the movie flows smoothly and works both as satire and satire's target. Ultimately you get another fun mockumentary. Rock on.

Cooper.jpg
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,138
4,506
118
The bit with the mirrors was alright (though not sure why they were so worried about Conan breaking the wrong last mirror, as he could then go break the other one after), everything else, not so much.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
The bit with the mirrors was alright (though not sure why they were so worried about Conan breaking the wrong last mirror, as he could then go break the other one after), everything else, not so much.
I think they were worried about him throwing a sword through a mirror with his allies in the firing range. Why they couldn't just take cover, that's another story.
 

PsychedelicDiamond

Wild at Heart and weird on top
Legacy
Jan 30, 2011
2,378
1,342
118
Iron Lung (2026)

Directorial debut of YouTuber Mark "iplier" Fischbach, based on an indie horror game by the Szymanski brothers of "Dusk" and "Gloomwood" fame. Now, I've always been rather unfamiliar with Fischbach's work on YouTube, I had, perhaps unfairly, always pegged him as another PewDiePie, i.e. an insufferable shouty manchild. I wasn't aware he had directorial ambitions, although as of right now there definitely seems to be a certain pipeline forming from YouTubers to film makers, which I'm not opposed to. New blood, no pun intended, has to come from somewhere. Unfortunately, however, I did not, really, enjoy Iron Lung.

So, Iron Lung is set in a rather vaguely outlined post-apocalyptic science fiction setting that, frankly, to me just felt like what it sounds like to me whenever someone tries to explain some aspect of Warhammer 40K's worldbuilding to me. The last remnants of humanity, confined to a small number of space stations, discover an ocean of blood on a remote moon. A convict with a dark past, played by Fischbach himself, is put on a submarine to scour that ocean and promised, if not very convincingly, his freedom in return.

So, what Iron Lung is, is effectively a one man chamber play, set almost exclusively in one single interior, that of the aforementioned submarine, and starring one guy, plus the voices of a few other people who are only very briefly seen on screen.

Make no mistake, I respect what Fischbach is doing here. While I'm not sure I would describe Iron Lung as very artistic, making a slow paced, repetetive one man play, set in a hermetically sealed room, and trying to carry it all by yourself is, if nothing else, ambitious. And to give credit where it's due, for an untrained actor, Fischbach is doing a fine job. Playing a troubled man, struggling against the influence of the, inevitable, eldritch horror at the bottom of a sea of blood, he's suitably expressive and, for the most part, sells his emotions well enough. I also think he did a fine job directing the movie, the claustrophobia is very palpable, the camera work if very dynamic, there is a genuine interest in the textures and details of its oppressive setting. And once it ramps up to its climax and starts to get all Event Horizon-y, the effect work is... well, it's adequate for what it is.

But as an actual movie, it all just felt way too messy and loose for something with sich a limited scope. It's trying to be a character study (good) and it's also a lovecraftian horror story (A natural combination, sure), but then it's also a dystopian science-fiction story with a lot of really silly worldbuilding and imagery and... I dunno, I found it both messy and not terribly engaging. See, I think there is a kernel of a pretty good idea here. A story about a man alone on a submarine going insane, perhaps under the influence of some eldritch horror. That's a very effective premise for a short horror story. Matter of fact, what Iron Lung feels like, is like it would have made a really good 60 minute episode of some Star Trek style tv show with a somewhat pre-established setting and characters. But as a standalone movie, this is just... well, pardon my language, it's just unwieldy nonsense.

It's a checklist of cosmic horror and body horror tropes that aren't really all that original or interesting, padded out with repetetive, laborious and, yes, very video gamey busywork that never really creates the tension it's going for, because it's just not as exciting watching a guy stuck in a submarine performing a dull, mind numbing job while losing his mind that it is being that guy. Especially when the actual cosmic horror aspect just isn't that interesting. I dunno, way too much of that stuff has just become cliche at this point.

Honestly, what Iron Lung feels like, more than anything, is some highlight reel for Fischbach's skills as an actor. Which, again, I'm not taking away from him, he's doing pretty well, all things considered, he definitely has a future as an actor. Perhaps even as a director, if he picks the right material to work with. But that's also all that Iron Lung is, really, a proof of concept, a glorified job application to be film director and a leading man. The actual substance of it is rather flimsy, I felt. Too overwritten to work as a raw character study, too vague to work as a science-fiction horror, too bloated to work as a short fan film. Maybe Mark Fischbach has a good or even a great movie in him, but this isn't it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias

Bob_McMillan

Elite Member
Aug 28, 2014
5,680
2,242
118
Country
Philippines
We finally got around to watching the infamous (maybe?) Suzume, from the people who made Your Name and Weathering With You. I was wondering why Makoto Shinkai hasn't really been in the news lately, and I think this movie is the answer.

Suzume has a ton in common with previous movies. Teenage protagonist basically running away from home, young romance, supernatural elements, natural disasters (earthquakes this time), pretty scenery with accompanying soothing soundtracks. But everything is just at a lower level. The titular protagonist is a bore, maybe because she is mainly interacting with a fucking chair, who is her love interest. The director didn't even want to do a romance this time, but it seems the suits shut him down. The lackluster romance almost feels like a cry of protest from him.

As usual, my biggest complaint is that the movie isn't really anything special as a viewing experience. The meteor effects from Your Name and the weather effects from Weathering With You are gorgeous, but this time we get crappy blatantly CGI red worms. Even the simple things like interiors feel less detailed and crafted. The soundtrack has one or good songs, but nothing as memorable as what Radwimps did for Your Name.

The movie is centered on Japan's forgotten places and disasters, but ironically I can already barely remember what happened in it. It does feel like it's the result of tired creatives being forced to churn out another surprise international box office success.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias

Ezekiel

Elite Member
May 29, 2007
2,209
760
118
Country
United States
Moonwalker (1988)


What a weird movie. Turns from a celebration of his work without time to play out a whole song to a series of dreams, all from the mind of a megalomaniac. I can believe the biopic claim that Michael told himself he was the best of all time. In fact, after the montage ends or just about then, the music quiets down and we're shown a table with all his awards and photos of himself. The story of the evil Joe Pesci character trying to sell drugs to kids doesn't make any sense (how he has this expensive military police force, as a drug dealer who has to kill Michael and the kids in order to hide his SECRET), but then dreams make no sense. It had parts I didn't like so much (Why did it have to end with the cover of "Come Together"?), but was an interesting insight into his mind.

I better appreciated the segments that I previously only knew as standalone music videos, now that they were in a chain of stories, and it was sweet to see them in more filmlike 1080p. It assume that it's a pretty old disc from the VC-1 format, but Warner Brothers does good work. I had no idea the lights in "Smooth Criminal" were supposed to be that warm. Looked great, that one. I was more excited with the context (Still kind of random, though.) now and the picture quality. I can only assume the music video on his official YouTube channel is still in 4:3 video-sourced (You can see those moving dots at the top of the picture, artifacts from the tape master.) standard definition because Warner Brothers owns the movie, and not the Jackson estate. At least his videos aren't being AI-upscaled, like for so many other artists. I'm sure those spectacles would have been awesome with my big TV and sound system (I wonder how they used the surrounds for this Dolby Stereo track.), but I still only have my laptop and in-ear monitors.

To remind us that he's black, the South African band Ladysmith Black Mambazo sings in the 1930s club during the end credits.


Two days ago I wrote the following, but didn't bother to copy it here.

'Rewatched Michael Jackson Bad Tour at Wembley Stadium 1988 two weeks ago and today HIStory Tour in Munich 1997 for the first time. HIStory is his best concert, in my opinion. Moving ending. The main portion of the song "Bad" was the best part of his Bad concerts, partly for that happy strut, which he used frequently in later concerts. I wish I had the flawed biopic Michael handy so that I could compare the "Bad" performance. I remember that the nephew Jaafar (whose makeup still bothers me enough that I think they should not have tried to match Michael's likeness) danced well and accurately, but I can't remember where he struts and what else he does. All the concerts run for so long that I have to take minutes long breaks. I rate the Bad tour :3.5/5: if pressed, but nowadays I just log movies without leaving a rating in the "list." Watched only twenty movies since April 2025, none of them rated. Off the Wall and Thriller era songs have too much of the '90s touch, but still fun. Visually, none of the live performances of "Thriller" through the years impress me much. The costumes and sets just aren't spooky enough.

'Yesterday, an interview with one of the makers of "Smooth Criminal," in which he explains that Annie is a CPR dummy, led me to rewatching that music video. It had been a few years since I last watched it and I forgot how polished and good the dancing is. Closer to perfection than the live concerts. I can't even remember what happens in the movie that it's from, Moonwalker. Can't remember who the kids are and where they run Michael off to after the gunfire. Downloading it.

'I frequently hear his songs played over the loudspeakers in the warehouse. I see shirts on two coworkers. Nice to see the accusations didn't stick. A few years ago, people on forums made fun of me for liking a pedophile, but now no one cites the disgraced Leaving Neverland documentary anymore.'
 
Last edited:

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,353
4,194
118
Country
United States