Keywords being, "even if".Even if there was an insistence on controlling land border there are way better solutions...
I'm just going to say it: he wasn't wrong at the time, save on who's doing what. That's all down to the cross-border human trafficking industry; in other words, coyotes. Surprise of surprises, sexual predation, coerced drug muling, physical assault and torture, and murder do indeed happen in human trafficking. Crazy, I know.Okay. You got me. He said Mexican IMMIGRANTS were rapist. So different...
He got it right by 2020, but by then the US mass media in its brazen, gratuitous, and wildly-profitable crusade to exceptionalize Trump and lay all American sin on his back, managed to brain worm the American populace to the point basic fact about immigration and crime has been long forgotten. Which is precisely how last year, there were a bunch of "educated" and "pro-immigration" "liberals" who didn't know what a fucking coyote was when it came up in the debates, racing to social media to make braying jackasses of themselves for clout.
And the problem with engaging Mexican police to "enforce" immigration, is they, cartels, and coyotes are all in bed together. It's paying the fox to watch the henhouse. It's all part and parcel of policy that has the appearance of border enforcement but in fact does no such thing, because the US economy is frankly reliant upon illegal, or at least abusive and exploitative in the case of work visa programs, immigration to function.
Last edited: