Yes but unless twitter had been fact checked themselves it wouldn't have been changed and because of the initial fact check info posted it's possible a number of people were mislead.Trump doing it wrong is really important. If he's going to make it worse rather than better, than its really important. What I don't want is Trump's crack down on Free Speech to lead to him cracking down on everyone. Because he being attacking the media for years and I could imagine a bill coming out soon for them too.
If you want to break up their power, you might have to use the Anti-Trust laws to break them apart. Place them in a special category that THEY DEFINITELY ARENT IN RIGHT NOW despite whatever Trump pretends.
How did you get that from this? 'Also, fact checking doesnt control the public discourse'. I'm saying we need more fact checking and somehow that makes me want Trump in control of Twitter?
Hey, you know how we found out about the facts about Twitters first attempt? BY FACT CHECKING. I.e. and this might be the most important thing you can do in your life: DO IT ALL THE TIME. LIKE EVERYONE AND TO EVERYONE. Taking away Twitter's power to fact check will mean we don't get that information and that is so much worse. And the fact checking point out how Trump didn't tell the truth. It's almost like everyone has an agenda and you should be taking that into account by FACT CHECKING
PS Did you guys not learn this in school? Did a teacher not show you in grade school some news and critique it pointing out biases?
It's mostly lucky the story didn't spread round far and wide before being corrected. Hell other outlets without much fact checking could have picked it up and spread it and then it becomes fact because of some version of Citogensis at work
Citogenesis
xkcd.com
Having twitter put up an easy "This is the truth" style section also discourages people looking round at multiple sources for the info.
Yes that is also dystopian and that's not what's being asked for by the government here. It's asking for evidence the platforms aren't acting more like publishers than platforms and are NOT using their position as defacto monopolies in their sectors to try and influence the public by say allowing certain links and banning others based on political positioning.Why do you think people were angry over Trump not putting his businesses into a trust like every other president? For shits and giggles? It makes everything look like a conflict of interest.
What I don't want to happen is like what is happening with Facebook and China at this time. They are forcing Facebook to give over certain information on their populace if Facebook wants to do business. Facebook has to do whatever the government wants just to be able to trade. That's dystopian.
Also you didn't answer the question about if you'd want Tencent (again they're not technically the Chinese government) or The Trump Organisation to be allowed to be the ones running the fact checking on said sites.