And when you compare the study results to the effectiveness of the vaccine...
The 'flu vaccine is 40-60% effective at preventing symptoms, up to 80% effective at preventing hospitalisation. We have those figures from many studies and effectively hundreds of thousands if not millions of people.
That is a study of flu in ~300 children, suggesting a 42% reduction in observed symptoms. That would indicate an effectiveness at the lower end of the vaccine, which is a long, long way from the "six times more effective" you claimed.
Secondly, and as I am so incredibly bored of pointing out with regards to your hopeless inadequacy in reviewing science, it's just one study. There are literally dozens of studies. A lot of them find much less, or no effectiveness. The end result of meta-analysis, and I'm repeating myself here from months ago, is that it seems beneficial in cases of vitamin D deficiency. Like, the sort of levels where bone health is impaired because, as also covered, that's why panels like the UK SACN don't find sufficient grounds to increase their current vit D recommendations.
No, you really didn't or else I would've had a similar response already. And you still wave away all the very real downsides of the drug that make it rather impractical.
I have literally, multiple times, stated that remdesivir either probably doesn't work, or is at best very niche. This is by far the most important downside that really needs to be considered, and I have definitely not waved it away.
Can you please get that into your skull for once and thereby stop lying?
There's the meta-analyses. He sounded like a quack before but wasn't. You act like he's some small town doctor but he's a very reputable doctor.
And Isaac Newton was one of the greatest scientists who ever lived. He also thought drinking mercury was good for him. Linus Pauling was one of the greatest chemists who ever lived, and took completely absurd quantities of vitamin C. Such is the world.
What meta-analyses, exactly? Have a read of:
You promised a meta-analysis, I literally quoted your post from about a month back. Since you're all into science and good studies and all that. Why are you linking to bad studies to prove your point? That's rather disingenuous. I thought there's good data showing ivermectin doesn't work?
Not for the first time, you're trying the dishonest trick of reversing the burden of proof, assuming ivermectin's effiacy and demanding that it is proven not to be. This is not how it works.
The long and short of it is that there is a mass of often very poor studies with variable results. What Tess Lawrie and Pierre Kory did was to ignore quality control and uncritically accept studies even if they were inadequate, unsuitable for comparison, not peer-reviewed, etc. The best of these studies tend to the negative. But I don't think you should necessarily conflate "best of a generally bad lot" with "good".
Nope, actual doctors have said that.
Great. Then you agree with this doctor, then, that illness is caused by witches and demons, and they reproduce by turning themselves into women to steal men's sperm.
Stella Immanuel has caught the US president's attention for claiming hydroxychloroquine cures Covid-19.
www.bbc.co.uk
Say a young women already had covid and is forced to get the vaccine and dies from the blood-clot side effect, why should that even be a thing that could happen even one time?
Don't give her the AZ or J&J vaccine in the first place. Problem solved.
Again, you always wanna sidestep around my questions. If someone had measles already, why would you vaccinated them? It doesn't make sense much like it doesn't make sense to get a covid vaccine if you already had it.
All kids are supposed to be vaccinated against measles via the MMR vaccine as routine. Hence the problem with the autism scare, which dropped vaccination rates and led to more kids suffering measles, although thankfully not that many more deaths - at least in the West. Lack of vaccination elsewhere, deaths.
Most people don't need tetanus booster jabs, either. But they're advised to get them. Get vaccinated even if you've had it because the more protection the better.
For instance, I bet there will be a load of twats who had a cold and decided they had caught covid, and will therefore conclude they don't need the vaccine - when in fact they are still at risk. Managing public health also means managing the unhelpful and perverse attitudes within the general public, such as those repeatedly demonstrated in this and other threads by you and Stroopwafel. You are precisely why every i needs to be dotted and every t needs to be crossed.