This is intentional. The only way to make money from NFTs is to convince other people that they'll be worth more in the future if they buy them from you at a price that you'll turn a profit from the sale. So anything that suggests that a procedurally generated image of an ape isn't a good investment medium is excised from the community so that the current batch of NFT holders can convince the next batch of future NFT holders more easily.
This is literally why so many of them are procedurally generated similar images that are created and minted on demand in a gacha-style system, it creates the illusion of rarity while also making the people buying in responsible for the minting fees. The minter of BoredApes (for example) only loses money on them if the cost of running the server scripts that generate them exceeds what he can make in new sales. Which means constantly onboarding new people who both are willing to trade for Apes other people have (to create the illusion of the Apes appreciating in value) and also willing to buy from the random generator. When the income drops below script hosting costs, he'll pull out and take his Ethereum with him, at which point everyone else who hasn't done so loses, as prices plummet to zero.