But they're MAGIC swords and bows!!!3) This annoyed me about Shang Chi and it comes up once more here: that Marvel insists on having Lord of the Rings style battles with swords and bows that rarely cut or hit anything, where no sane person would turn down an actual gun. You're trying to kill the thing anyway, why handicap yourself with medieval terms of engagement?
That would be pretty rad, actually.a man in a silly green and yellow suit mowing down ninjas with gun-kata.
How about a MAGIC M60 machine gun.But they're MAGIC swords and bows!!!
How about a MAGIC M60 machine gun.
You actually had me thinking of the Wakandan military, which is apparently composed purely of motherfuckers with essentially magic rocket launchers. Which is cool right up until you need to go against a mindless horde of baddies. Warmachine, with the superpower of "has lots of guns", was more effective on his own than the hundreds of soldiers present.How about a MAGIC M60 machine gun.
I enjoy the John Wick movies and their clones, but I wouldn't mind a return to over the top gun battles. Equilibrium is so stupid but I enjoy it so much.That would be pretty rad, actually.
That sounds surprisingly fun. On one hand, I didn't expect them to let Raimi make a Raimi movie. On the other hand, his Spiderman movies are in many ways what the average MCU flick is trying to be.Dr Strange 2
I haven't seen the trailer so I don't know how much I'm spoiling simply by describing the plot (which is incredibly vague going by the Wikipedia premise), so I won't. I like that the powers that be apparently let Raimi actually make the movie, going by all the twisting angles and chasy cameras and general over-the-topness which includes, by my count, the only body horror these movies have registered so far. The whole movie is ridiculous and I can't think of anybody better than Raimi to helm it, since he's great at straddling that line.
There's a whole lot of cameos and stunt casting that had the fat fucks behind me creaming their pants, so the movie's gonna work wonderfully for that crowd and will be great fodder for Things That You Missed clickbait.
Couple of things that did nothing for me:
1) The effects are very wobbly in quality, somewhere between ok and Spy Kids. The creativity of the set pieces far outweighs their realism or believability.
2) America Chavez is kinda meh, more plot device than character. No hate on the actress but she really isn't given much to do. And all that buzz about acknowledging her as a member of LbGT was bullshit in the end. She has two moms for all of 16 seconds and wears a pride pin. That's it.
3) This annoyed me about Shang Chi and it comes up once more here: that Marvel insists on having Lord of the Rings style battles with swords and bows that rarely cut or hit anything, where no sane person would turn down an actual gun. You're trying to kill the thing anyway, why handicap yourself with medieval terms of engagement?
4) They're really getting lazy with the mid-credits scenes. This and Eternals are major low effort teasers and seem to be more about who they hired than what's gonna happen next.
*sigh* If only they could actually succeed in it.On the other hand, his Spiderman movies are in many ways what the average MCU flick is trying to be.
Rock and Rule? Though, whether that's a musical cartoon or a cartoon about musicians is another question. They just happen to be furries and one of them wants to open a portal to hell for no real reason, which is a bit unusual.The only musical cartoons I can watch in full, Disney or not are:
That is all I got.
- Lion King
- Princess and the Frog
- Tangled - Though that one does not have that many songs, if I remember correctly.
- Cat's Don't Dance - a majority of those songs kick ass!
- Hunchback of Nortre Dame - I could have gone without the gargoyles singing. That whole sequence could have been axed.
- Both Goofy movies. Then again, the second movie is not really a musical aside from one song.
Never seen it.Rock and Rule? Though, whether that's a musical cartoon or a cartoon about musicians is another question. They just happen to be furries and one of them wants to open a portal to hell for no real reason, which is a bit unusual.
I was surprised by how much leeway Raimi apparently had in designing the composition of the shots and the movement of the camera (the look not so much). There's the obvious second camera crew for the more grandiose standard issue Marvel brawls, but Raimi is clearly directing the movie around them. There's a lot of weird little pickups involving extras that reminded me of his Spider-Man movies. He sets up a lot of goofy but effective jump-scares. There's cameras behaving with a personality of their own and fourth-wall breaking and possessed characters contorting like Deadites and what looks to me like a clear homage to Darkman. And his love of torturing characters really shows here. You rarely see Marvel characters show any pain or fear (ACTUAL pain or fear, without trying to look cool or jaded about it) but here it's as over the top as those get. And again even for a relatively bloodless movie there's a lot of body horror straddling the line between gnarly and ridiculous.That sounds surprisingly fun. On one hand, I didn't expect them to let Raimi make a Raimi movie. On the other hand, his Spiderman movies are in many ways what the average MCU flick is trying to be.
This was the perfect movie for me to go see when my wife was out of town for a couple of days. Real dudebro type flick. I'm like "look honey, Viking movie!" and she's like "what's it about besides Vikings" and I'm like "who cares... Vikings!" which was not a selling point. Yeah, she'd have hated it. I dug it.The Northman
As a genre film it follows familiar beats, but it looks like a movie in which mysticism and a pretty insane idea of honor drives people forward. Or y'know... some of them. I got a lot of Ari Aster vibes (Hereditary, Midsommar) and wouldn't you know it, Aster's and Lars Knudsen's company Square Peg was among the producers. 8/10
It felt the same as Joker to me, all inspiration/reference, but no substance. Even the end felt like a teenager being like "wouldn't be so badass to end a Batman movie just like Tool's Aenima?"The Batman
First half, because I literally fell asleep.
You know, I get that Batman is going to grumble in a monotone. But does everybody? Gordon, every cop, every criminal, freaking Catwoman, all talk like that? And the whole movie is at night, so I'm strainging and squinting and nothing interesting is happening and zzzzzzzzzzz
So I was reading a bit about this flick on the interwebs and everybody talking about how it's inspired by movies like Chinatown, Klute, The Pentagon Papers, Taxi Driver... I love those movies! And that somehow the portrayal of Bruce Wayne is inspired by Kurt Cobain... I love Nirvana!
But just smushing references and inspiration results in a bland goop of sort of nothing, which is what this felt like.
You should read the book. Movie Bond is practically a saint in comparison.Goldfinger
Peak Bond. The movie checks all the marks: open with some mission wrapping up, provocative title sequence with a semi-naked lady, the MI6 trifecta (Bond gets berated by M, flirts with Moneypenny and gets on Q's nerves while collecting his gadgets), meet a villain obsessed about one particular thing and a badass henchman with a gimmick; introduce one or two Bond girls (first one always dies), get captured and tortured in a novel way, etc. The name's Bond (James Bond), takes his martinis shaken (not stirred) and he's finally quipping witty remarks whenever he kills someone. Coming from the more Hitchcockian Fom Russia With Love, this one is both a return to form (Dr. No was a milder version of this, slower and more uneven) as well as a blueprint for the rest of the movies to come, going all in on 60s slick sexy spy flick appeal (Dr. No feels more like a dull mad scientist movie from the 50s).
Having said all that... boy does Bond come across as a mysogynist in this movie. Dr. No and From Russia also treated Bond like a relentless stud too but at least he seemed to revere and enjoy the ladies with a bemused, this-is-all-a-dream detachment. In Goldfinger he flat out despises women, treating them as hurdles in the way of "man talk", carelessly getting two of them killed and essentially raping the third one. The worst part (well, maybe not the worst, but the irony stood out) is that raping Pussy Galore ends up being a crucial step into foiling Goldfinger, not that Bond planned it that way or that it makes any sense that it would work out that way either.