So is Trump, DeSantis, Biden and Clinton
All true (not sure about Clinton, but the others, sure). And? I'm not sure what your point is.
You're not excluded from Identity politics just because you do the white male thing only
True, but I can try not to play the game. But it appears by your definition, canon fits identity politics.
Yes, you did all of that. From the first post. You could have had your opinions of how things should go and that would have been fine. But you decided everyone needed to follow your interpretation of GoT. Please stop
Checks first post...
Ah yes, where you lie that everyone in the setting is white, and said in my first post (which was after yours), and I quote, "Still, HotD won't be made or broken based on the skin colour of its characters."
So not only are you a hypocrite (since you're forcing your definition of LotR by the criteria you're using), but you're a fucking liar as well.
But then, we all knew that.
Just because you find something iffy, doesn't mean that I have
I really don't care what you notice since either you're mentally ill, or you're a liar.
Probably fucking both.
All those points about lore and female space marine that you written out 3 times to me has not convinced me that 40K must ban female space marines. They are not convincing. You don't realise that can just write MORE LORE that says something new. I know this won't make any sense to you, but you are only doing male space marine because that's what you want. The lore justification are just made up stuff. You can just make up new stuff
Oh for God's sake...
First, I never said that GW should ban female Space Marines. I did say, among other things, that if there was a time to introduce female Space Marines, it should have been with the Primaris Marines, but that ship has sailed. I did say why I think female Space Marines are silly from a thematic standpoint (among other things), and arguably hypocritical (since no-one's pushing for male Sisters of Battle), but as far as hard lore goes, there's no ironclad rule that prohibits it.
Second, it's nice to know that you have such contempt for fiction that lore is just "made up stuff." From a technical standpoint that's true, but there's good worldbuilding and bad worldbuilding. Anyone can "make up new stuff," that's besides the point. I "make up stuff" every time I write fiction, whether it's good or bad is in the eyes of the reader.
The original justification of Sister of Battle was some of the most cringy, woke ass, illogical bullshit that was made up on the spot to sell products.
Which was what, exactly? And after all you've done, why should I belive you?
That's fine because NOW they've created some incredible lore that goes beyond its initial stupidity
And does that lore contradict the old lore or not?
Ignore me, or don't. I don't mind. Demanding everyone needs to follow whatever laws you made up around lore is just forcing your ideals on people.
Laws that I made up? I'm flattered you think that I created the settings that have been discussed and the lore for them but...wait. I'm not.
Second, no-one's forcing anyone here to do anything since no-one has authority over the IPs that have been discussed. If anyone, you're the one forcing YOUR ideals, since they basically boil down to "anything goes, canon be damned." Which isn't the worst thing in the world, but you've also had to make up stuff to make your points, as detailed above. No-one's forced to give a damn about versimilitude, but when you extend to lying, gaslighting, and hypocrisy, don't be surprised when people notice. If you say "I want X," and people respond "but X would break the lore" (or less severely, "X wouldn't fit"), you need a better argument than "it's fiction."
They aren't written down, and I'm not interested in buy into those laws and I'm tried of having to follow them
Follow...what?
First, most of what's been discussed HAS been written down - most of the IPs discussed have things written down. Or do all the novels, codecies, and guidebooks not count?
Second, you don't have to follow anything, but if you're making claims about in-universe facts, it's on you to back them up.
You can imagine whatever you want, write whatever you want, fanwank whatever you want (certainly I do/have done all that), but that's not what you're doing, what YOU'RE doing is imposing your own laws and expecting everyone else to follow them.
What's ironic is that you're doing the very things you accuse others of doing.