I mean, I'm friends with all the people I work with and am happy to be there. I know I'm odd, but that is an option.Offices are stale, stifling, soul-crushing places that we're evolving past as a society.
I mean, I'm friends with all the people I work with and am happy to be there. I know I'm odd, but that is an option.Offices are stale, stifling, soul-crushing places that we're evolving past as a society.
That's not odd.I mean, I'm friends with all the people I work with and am happy to be there. I know I'm odd, but that is an option.
As someone who's never done office work, let 'em stay home. The fact that my job doesn't allow it is no reason to force other people into an office. I'm not that pettyAlright let's all work from home then. Who wants to tell the restaurants, amusement parks, virtually all recreation, national parks, etc.
This argument really only applies to people who do "office work" and not other work force even has a remote (ha punny) chance of getting the same treatment.
While office community *might* have it's benefits, we're in the age of mass layoffs to support the stock price. Office morale is shitThat's not odd.
I'm not a fan of forms of office design (e.g. tiny cubicles), because I think they are often designed for efficiency and staff monitoring in ways that can be distinctly uncomfortable, alienating and sometimes controlling for workers. However, I do think there are substantial plusses to going to a workplace and interacting with colleagues face to face - maybe 2-3 days a week? Workplaces should have a sense of community, and I don't think Zoom/Teams calls cut it.
Don't worry, soon ChatGPT and the like will have the opportunity to put everyone out of a job.While office community *might* have it's benefits, we're in the age of mass layoffs to support the stock price. Office morale is shit
My office (the physical room, not the entire building) is 10 desks in cubicle-like layout, but there are no cubicle walls. Our workflow is highly conversational, in that if we need someone else we can basically just look up at them and ask the question. Or like, if a salesperson is transferring a customer to me for support, I've heard half of the conversation by the time I've answered the phone. I cannot imagine how much time would slip away if we had to actively make contact with each other and communicate everything down the line for every question.That's not odd.
I'm not a fan of forms of office design (e.g. tiny cubicles), because I think they are often designed for efficiency and staff monitoring in ways that can be distinctly uncomfortable, alienating and sometimes controlling for workers. However, I do think there are substantial plusses to going to a workplace and interacting with colleagues face to face - maybe 2-3 days a week? Workplaces should have a sense of community, and I don't think Zoom/Teams calls cut it.
3 days a week is what blizzard wants. They arent even asking for the full week.That's not odd.
I'm not a fan of forms of office design (e.g. tiny cubicles), because I think they are often designed for efficiency and staff monitoring in ways that can be distinctly uncomfortable, alienating and sometimes controlling for workers. However, I do think there are substantial plusses to going to a workplace and interacting with colleagues face to face - maybe 2-3 days a week? Workplaces should have a sense of community, and I don't think Zoom/Teams calls cut it.
To be fair, the added efficiency is easier for me to appreciate commuting 10-15 minutes through basically rural PA than someone commuting like an hour in a city, and the people I work for are pretty flexible in hours (showing up a bit late, leaving a bit early, scheduling time off). It all only works because it's loose and social and the only hard standard is "does your work get done?". If someone took my job and tried to treat it with the rigidity of an assembly line, it would be, as they say, soul-crushing.3 days a week is what blizzard wants. They arent even asking for the full week.
It is also better for mental health to interact with people directly sometimes and not always via the internet. Not to mention how much more efficient working with people in person is as the example Tstorm provides above.
You still couldn't pay me enough ot work an office job. I've been to that purgatory and I'm not going back and I sympathize with anyone who feels the same.3 days a week is what blizzard wants. They arent even asking for the full week.
Okay well an office job aint for you, that's ok. But that doesn't mean a company shouldn't expect employees to come to the office, again especially when the work is secretive by nature or when group communication is a core aspect of the job. There are a lot of jobs people can do that don't involve an office, and that's great for them.You still couldn't pay me enough ot work an office job. I've been to that purgatory and I'm not going back and I sympathize with anyone who feels the same.
I used to drive 100 miles every day 50 miles each way to get to my office. It was part of my living situation, and I simply saved money until I could afford to move to a place that is only 1 mile from the office. I understand how much traffic can suck, but honestly there are so many good things you can do while driving to work.To be fair, the added efficiency is easier for me to appreciate commuting 10-15 minutes through basically rural PA than someone commuting like an hour in a city, and the people I work for are pretty flexible in hours (showing up a bit late, leaving a bit early, scheduling time off). It all only works because it's loose and social and the only hard standard is "does your work get done?". If someone took my job and tried to treat it with the rigidity of an assembly line, it would be, as they say, soul-crushing.
The extent of the point I want to make here is not that offices are good universally, but that they are potentially and contextually both efficient and uplifting, and we are not, by any means, "evolving past them as a society".
I think that's increasingly likely in academic and associated circles; if nothing else it becomes a club to crush wages: 'We want you to do the job because you're better than the AI, but we want to pay you what the AI would cost us because that's the next best thing that you're competing with.' Just digital offshoring used to keep skilled labour hungry.Don't worry, soon ChatGPT and the like will have the opportunity to put everyone out of a job.
In fact, I wonder whether my job will increasingly become as a sort of "editor" or "fact checker" for AI-derived material.
So if people work better remotely, why not let them?Okay well an office job aint for you, that's ok. But that doesn't mean a company shouldn't expect employees to come to the office, again especially when the work is secretive by nature or when group communication is a core aspect of the job. There are a lot of jobs people can do that don't involve an office, and that's great for them.
The company doesn't work better remotely. That's why. If the person works better remotely then there needs to be a look into why. A business or workplace cannot cater to an individual worker and ideally must try to be as neutral an environment as possible for all people working there to get whatever work done. Sure some people work better in isolation, but isolation isn't reality because commication between departments, co-workers, project leaders, is all incredible hampered by working remotely, compared to working in a single location.So if people work better remotely, why not let them?
Speak for yourself and the corporate jack offs at Activision Blizzard. I know not every corporation can have a work from home, but considering her dealing with, they can get their job done fine at home or through zoom. If you're that happy go for it, why don't you just do it yourself or join up with AB. You know they're crap and this argument really doesn't add or help the people under much.The company doesn't work better remotely. That's why. If the person works better remotely then there needs to be a look into why. A business or workplace cannot cater to an individual worker and ideally must try to be as neutral an environment as possible for all people working there to get whatever work done. Sure some people work better in isolation, but isolation isn't reality because commication between departments, co-workers, project leaders, is all incredible hampered by working remotely, compared to working in a single location.
We've established though that Blizzard cannot be trusted. Why should they be trusted on this matter?The company doesn't work better remotely. That's why. If the person works better remotely then there needs to be a look into why. A business or workplace cannot cater to an individual worker and ideally must try to be as neutral an environment as possible for all people working there to get whatever work done. Sure some people work better in isolation, but isolation isn't reality because commication between departments, co-workers, project leaders, is all incredible hampered by working remotely, compared to working in a single location.
Sure individually you might be able to get your personal work done better, but when it comes to relating that work to others the remote worker falls short. And for the record, I don't think it's an unreasonable compromise to ask for the worker to be in-office a couple of days a week. Which is what Blizzard wants.
??? Yes they did. Lots of people had a problem with it before covid.Blizzard is a shit company, but I really don't understand the mentality that people should be upset about having to go to work. Nobody had a problem going to the office pre-covid, and nobody should have a problem going to work now.
Lol, how much of any given work week in most office jobs is taken up by a round-the-table brainstorming session?Plus you loose a lot of interpersonal brainstorming in creative fields when not done in person.
Who would take a job they didn't want or weren't able to physically goto? People might have wanted to work from home, but they didn't and they didn't mass quit because they weren't able to.??? Yes they did. Lots of people had a problem with it before covid.
Employers repeatedly argued that WFH for long periods wasn't possible or sustainable. Then the pandemic happened and... that turned out to be completely untrue.
So basically those retailers are saying that work from home is removing their customer base, which means they can't stay open, which means they loose everything they've built and all their employees loose their jobs.You know who the main lobbyists are for returning to the office here in the UK? Owners of retail outlets. Not because of their own staff, oh no; their own staff are already back in-person since reopening. No, they're lobbying for everyone /else/ to get back to the office because they make money from the daily commute. People forced to take hours-long journeys every day buy stuff they don't need, which they wouldn't buy if they were able to stay home.