I am definitely not touching AH. It has that bad mechanic of constantly respawning enemies in the open world (why are developers still doing this?!) that gets tedious after hour one, and does a worse version of the Ubisoft towers. This game has been in development since 2017. This is the best they can come up with?
I'd make a joke that Russia is like a decade behind at all times but I honestly can't considering a lot of other devs are doing the same shit.
This wouldn't be so bad for me, if the developers committed to one idea, instead of doing everything and not being good at any of them. If you're gonna do SS/Bioshock, fine, but don't add the crap that was in FC2/3/4/5/6, and the really annoying aspects of Wolfenstein (2009) and Wolfenstein: Youngblood. Do one or the other, and I would have preferred the Shock route. We're in 2023, and Atomic Heart acts like we're between 2014-2019. From what I am seeing, the game plays more like an Action-RPG shooter than anything like the Shocks or Prey (2017). That is not exactly the problem, but it's the same shit FC: New Dawn & 6 suffered from by adding in RPG elements. AH does have some quality of life improvements (such as mass looting and inventory), but not enough for me to touch the game
I wonder how many he'll get through before the cease-and-desist from Nintendo hits.A Tattoo Artist Is Inking Every Original Pokémon for Charity - IGN
Here's a heartwarming story for you on Valentine's Day: a tattoo artist has challenged himself to ink all 151 original Pokémon to benefit the Blue Cross animal welfare charity.www.ign.com
Bloody poser. He's only doing the first 151!
Not to take away from what you said but honestly I'm still annoyed Wolfenstein Youngblood was so lackluster(or so people keep telling me). It sounds like a really fun premise, passing the torch to BJ's kids, having them go liberate Nazi occupied Paris in the 1980's while having a nazi-killing good time to 80's sythwave. Too bad the implantation was just garbage,. Apparently it's nearly impossible to play solo and still unfair if you play it co-op the way you were meant to.
www.theguardian.com
Thanks a lot to the suits at WBD for steeling Ed’s thunder. /s
I don't know, there are a few game that are interesting but never became big enough to justify a major overhaul patch, or already made a shit ton of money so the dev don't really care about fixing it. In those case I would be okay with paying for a DLC, the problem is once the floodgate open, every patch would become DLC.
Isn't there an issue where if/when you die in a dungeon or boss fight, you respawn at a checkpoint but your ammo doesn't? So if you used up a big chunk of your ammo and then died to the boss, you respawn with that same fraction you died with and now are completely screwed in the boss fight if you try to jump back into it because now you probably don't have enough ammo to actually win.
