Also, pokemons ? I don't know pokemons at all, how does it work ? Willing slavery ? Rebellions ? Rationalizations, spectators outrage ?
I'm not overly versed with Pokemon, but my understanding is that pokemon don't welcome being captured per se, while on the other hand, working with a trainer allows them to gain strength faster. A sort of "if you were good enough to capture me, then you're probably worth teaming up with.
Alternatively, maybe they're captured and spend all their time with Professor Oak? If so, sucks to be them I guess. 0_0
But on a more serious note, Pokemon's had its share of controversy, usually from PETA, about the whole capturing animals aspect. And I'd be more sympathetic to that argument if it didn't underestimate kids' intelligence, not to mention adults.
You don't want peace in WH40k, you don't want civilization in Mad Max, etc. In that kind of universes, something must and will happen to maintain its features. Something will rationalize its permanence. I don't think it's a things that, in itself, tells much about real-world attitudes.
Heh, speak for yourself.
Still, the thing with Warhammer is that it's a case of "status quo is king," where people are invested in the setting rather than the plot (if Warhammer can even be said to have a plot per se). Even Mad Max has technically adjusted its status quo with each movie, from society on the verge of collapse (movie 1), to society having collapsed (movie 2), to post-nuclear war (movie 3) - still not sure if movie 4 is really a reboot or continuation, and since I've only seen the first movie (bleh), I won't say much more.
I thought Dobby wasn't under magical restrictions, at least by the time he was at Hogwarts, but he'd been conditioned to obey the rules and hadn't been deprogrammed.
Well that's assuming there's "programming" in the first place, and despite various theories, there's no actual evidence of this.
But to answer your question, as far as I can tell, Dobby has complete latitude at Hogwarts to do as he wants. He even negotiates downwards when Dumbledore offers him payment.
Artemis Fowl is also just not nearly as good. Doesn't have half the charm of the wizarding world and the characters are all annoyingly perfect.
Dem's fighting words, pony!
Snark aside, I agree with you. I liked Artemis Fowl well enough back in the day, but it just isn't as good as HP. Course there's a subjective statement to make, but as you said, the world doesn't have the charm. The characters are decent, but not as memorable. There's a reasonable amount of worldbuilding, but nowhere near as much, or as in-depth. Also, I haven't read every book (I read at least the first four), but as far as I could tell, there was less of an overall plot, with each book being mostly stand-alone, and while Artemis does develop over the course of the books (least the ones I read), he doesn't grow up in the same way Harry does, with the HP books' maturity increasing with Harry's age. Not to mention that in HP, there's one clear, overall story to keep you invested, with plot hints dropped in the first book becoming manifest many books later.
Only thing about Quidditch that irks me is the Golden Snitch being an instant win condition. Sure catching it can mark end of play but if it’s (significant) point allocation isn’t enough to simply win by highest score then it’s just a mercy killing for your side. Otherwise it seems simple enough.
It plays more of a role in tournaments and where overall point tallies are calculated.
But yes, I think quidditch would work better if the point tally for the snitch was reduced - 50 points, maybe? Makes the chasers far more important.
Rambling aside, it's part of why I don't buy the "right place at the right time" argument. Sometimes, works are just better. It's part of why I even read the first Worst Witch book, and, yeah. It's pretty bad actually, even accounting for the intended audience.
Don't mind me, just snagging that #1000.
For that, you deserve 0001.
However to me it brings to mind Wizard ice hockey. Compare the function of a quidditch team to like, the Mighty Ducks. You’ve got Goldberg, the goalie. Your beaters are just enforcers Fulton and Portman with the added advantage of having special pucks only they can hit, expressly to clobber other players with. The rest of the team is Charlie, Adam, Jesse and Averman as (I think) the forwards who try and score goals.
...oh don't mind me, I'm just one of those people who's never understood the popularity of the Mighty Ducks movie, who considers Little Giants to be much better, and whose "Mighty Ducks" were the animated cartoon ones.
Carry on.
Sounds a lot like only viewing people with learning disabilities as animals or pets...
Who views people with disabilities as pets?
Maybe there's some people in the world, but not many.
HP has a lot of very weird nicknames for things, I like it for the sheer creativity. My favorite has to be the Moaning Myrtle. The jokes practically make themselves.
You know, as someone who's watched the Cursed Child stageplay, you're actually closer to the money than you might imagine...
Who did Trump doxx again?
If doxxing was the worst of Trump's crimes, we (and by we, I mean the world) would have less to worry about. Alas...
30 more pages and we can pass the Elden Ring thread.
This thread's running circles around it.