Very credible given that you can't even admit that Ukraine has a Nazi problem. "The actual" lol
I'll put it differently.
At this point, one wouldn't be able to gobble up the kremlin propaganda and talking points if there wasn't a passionate bias in favor of Putin's dictatorship. This bias stems from the characteristics of Putin's ideology and mode of government, which embraces all the values of fascism (suppression of the press, militarism, glorification of might and power, oppression of minorities, virilism, sexism and homophobia), the illiberal counter-model to the West's explicit values. Not to the West's hypocrisy, mind you, not to the West failure at implementing these values between its own armwrestling progressive and conservative currents, but to the West very proclaimed goals. It not "oh noes, the west isn't sufficiently democratic and respectful of diversities actually", it's "bleh, the west values democracy and diversities, what a bunch of pussies". Putin is any western fascist's wet dream, he generates the same admiration as Hitler and Mussolini did among conservatives in 1930s Europe, for the same reasons. And with that admiration comes support and alignment to its justificative, apologetic narratives - even as he conquers his neighbours and commits the worst atrocities to that effect.
Now the funny thing with fascism, is that nationalism is a very strong element of it, which means that international solidarity is fragile and temporary. For all the love and admiration that Metaxas had for Adolf Hitler, his policies and ideology, when Greece's sovereignty got threatened (when Hitler favored Mussolini over him), Metaxas turned against Germany. In France, while a lot of pro-fascists were all too happy to serve Hitler through the Vichy regime, a number of them also fought "the Germans" at the side of democratic resistants. In Ukraine, extreme-right currents don't all embrace Putin's occupation, some fight against it.
Yet, using it to make ideological parallels between Ukraine (or Ukraine+Europe+USA) and Russia is just deliberate bad faith. Precisely because Putin's regime is the very incarnation of fascist values, at all levels, and gets a large support from the extreme-right abroad for that reason. Using the "nazi" word as a stigma for enemies is absolutely cynical from a regime politically
and geopolitically so close to 1930 Germany - it's the same joke as racists going "no, you are the anti-white racist" or "no, you are the ones who don't like diversity because you don't like nazis". It's the standard procedure of emptying a loaded word of its content, and reversing its meaning. To achieve that, you are playing on scales. An extreme-right regime attacking a country (beam) and using magnifying lenses on its extreme-right militias (mote). If it wasn't for clashing nationalisms, Putin would have zero issue with "nazis" : he funds and supports them throughout the world as they praise him back. But zooming out would be inconvenient for your narrative.
I am calling you a hypocrite. And, as I'm telling you that your hypocritical "not giving weapons to any group" simply expresses the desire to see Putin's Russia squish Ukraine, I attribute your support of Russia to a fondness for its political and societal model and its actual fascistic values. If you truly cared about "nazism", you'd be more concerned about this regime conquering its neighbours. If Putin cared about "nazism", his government and his laws would be completely different, and his network of supporters would be the opposite. But sure, stay "credible" and go defend the values of democracy with Iran, North Korea and the European extreme-right.