This is not actually considering the question, you're just rationalizing picking a side. If everything was reversed, if a conservative was looting based on truth and the black community were protesting the counting of electors based on lies, would you give the same answer? Would you actually say "stealing is the lesser crime"?
If the Maga faithful showed evidence of election tampering and circumventing the presidential office and then did Jan 6, I would say they were justified
If Trump leaked all those documents to Wikileaks instead of just showing off to gain, I would be against the documents case entirely
If BLM said there was police brutally and then there was no video to back it up, I would be ignoring them
Now, that doesn't mean I think the Jan 6 should invade Congress. Being outside is fine. Keeping as much looting out of protest would be best but I am going to be way more cranky at protest organizers than looters over protest. I'm going to be cranky at looters seperately
Edit: I should point out that this course of questioning is coming from Phoenix shifting goals posts about BLM from protest to riot very quickly. I should have rectified this claim instead of letting it go. 99% of BLM involved no rioting, more than half was done by police to protesters.
So, I'm only really comparing the average citizen to police in BLM and to Jan 6. And the police were more brutal than citizens in both situations. And if there is a crime, I prefer it to be property damage over physical