Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The only person worried about Snow White not being White was you. YOU said they weren't. No one else here is concerned
THEN you brought in a totally different definition of White with the Census graph and pretended it was the same definition
I provided four different definitions of White. Because I know that there are differences in opinions and I'm not trying to pass one definition of White as another to score political points like you
Every single one of China's allies, minus North Korea, is being checkmated by the US, and Co. Russia is fighting Ukraine, and despite having a larger economy and military at the start, is stalemating. Iran is getting bombed daily by Israel, Pakistan is getting an India armed with F-35s and had Indian airstrikes hit its bases with Rafales, and even South Africa is suffering. Brazil is a US ally, as they are against Venezuela.
If Israel can do that to Iran, the second-best drone user in the Middle East before Turkey, imagine what the US could do. Trump despite saying he wants peace doesn't want peace in the same way a bear will always poop in the woods. To have peace would mean time for US rivals to arm and equip themselves with conventional long-range ballistic missiles, and hit US cities like Israel was hit by Iran. No country that wants to be a superpower will ever achieve peace in this globalized world, save for the superpower being a world government, which the US doesn't want right now.
If Israel can do that to Iran, the second-best drone user in the Middle East before Turkey, imagine what the US could do. Trump despite saying he wants peace doesn't want peace in the same way a bear will always poop in the woods. To have peace would mean time for US rivals to arm and equip themselves with conventional long-range ballistic missiles, and hit US cities like Israel was hit by Iran. No country that wants to be a superpower will ever achieve peace in this globalized world, save for the superpower being a world government, which the US doesn't want right now.
Peace for Trump is like peace for Israel. Everyone is either dead or subservient so they can't fight back
No elected US president wants peace, that's the point of being the head of a superpower, you initially wish to peace to surpass the existing superpower, then you want to have allies fight your enemies so they are too distracted to do an arms build-up against you.
If you went to a farm and tried to light horses on fire, you could get trampled to death there too. It's not about the police at that point at all. Frankly, if you're lighting puddles of gas on fire, you might die doing it. It's not a matter of deservedness if you accidentally kill yourself in the course of doing something stupid, but it's not anyone's fault but your own if you do.
The thing he deserved from the police is to be arrested, as he was committing crimes that are meant to be prevented by police. He was pushed down not as a punishment, but to prevent him from running away and repeating his actions.
You really have no other recourse. I say the truth, you don't like it, but you can't dispute it, so all you can do is lash out in anger.
Take note: the people arguing with me are lying about events and defending literally incendiary attacks.
Horse is ridden over the man on video, in a way that could easily have killed him = assumption the rider had lost control, and that an unseen action by the man must have directly brought it on himself.
Man is near some fire on the video = assumption the man definitely set it.
All of this is unseen, presumption, yet presented by yourself with such absolute certainty. What we actually see is fire near him, and then a horse ridden directly over him. Can you not see how your standards are wildly inconsistent here? How every assumption about something offscreen is crafted to exonerate the police in whatever you see happen, and accuse the man of whatever convenient? One could do this with any video evidence of brutality: oh, he definitely did something offscreen to bring it on himself, the police didn't mean to put him in a lethal situation, etc.
This is an outright lie.
What I am curious about is what he was wearing on his head that warranted the removal of, since it was clearly kicked away upon removal. (5:06:51-5:06:53)
Let's consider your assumptions: This person just happened to be nearby when people were attacking the police, it's coincidence that he ran away from the area the fire appeared just after it appeared. Then the police captured him for no reason at all. Then they tried to trample him with horses and missed. Then they tried to beat him with a stick and missed. And we should all be outraged at the ways they failed to seriously injure this man because they were obviously trying to and just incompetent.
And no, you can't do this with any video evidence of brutality. There are situations in the world where peaceful people have been hurt by police. Innocent people have been shot to death in traffic stops, that's not going to have the same circumstances as someone safely detained after trying to light the cops on fire. We're not at the edge of a slippery slope with this one.
apologies if already been posted and I missed it, the zone continues to be flooded with concerning escalations
Last edited:
The first requires no leap at all: it's a public street. Any incident that happens on any public street will inevitably happen near numerous innocent people.
The second... is fucking obvious. I'd run if I saw a fire break out near me. It's amazing you'd try to insinuate that wanting to get away from fire is evidence of arson.
They didn't "capture him for no reason". When policing a protest, overzealous police will often react to anyone present with violent suppression to try to assert control. I've seen it happen personally.
And they didn't fail. They rode right over him, he's clearly visibly impacted.
* not safely detained, clearly ridden over by a fucking horse;
** You assume he did this solely because he was near some fire.
You would make a series of similar assumptions regardless, if you were politically sympathetic to whomever was in power, or politically unsympathetic to the protest. You've needed nothing substantial to make the assumptions and accusations here, so why would you need special circumstances elsewhere?
Y'all still giving the two resident Nazis here your precious time, huh?
More fool you, my time isn't precious!
Mine isn't either, but when it's spent on conveying facts to Nazis it suddenly is.
FBI offers $50,000 reward for suspect sought in targeted shootings of Minnesota state lawmakers
Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband have died after they were shot at their home in Brooklyn Park.
kstp.com
Shift?
Last edited:
4 ppl attackedFBI offers $50,000 reward for suspect sought in targeted shootings of Minnesota state lawmakers
Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband have died after they were shot at their home in Brooklyn Park.
Shift?
Minnesota shooting suspect went to homes of two more politicians, prosecutors say - follow live
Vance Luther Boelter, 57, is charged with killing Melissa Hortman, a Minnesota Democrat, and her husband Mark.
www.bbc.com
was inevitable tbh
vpn adjacent stuff probably needed for UK peeps but otherwise, Richard Ayoade!
Last edited:
I love videos like these. Where people in corrupt position gets their just desserts.
EDIT: I replaced the most of the videos, because they're possible AI driven and I hate that.
EDIT: I replaced the most of the videos, because they're possible AI driven and I hate that.
Last edited:
Am I missing something or do all of those seem incredibly AI-made?