Discuss and Rate the Last Film You Watched

Recommended Videos

Is this the first poll?


  • Total voters
    47

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,369
4,211
118
Country
United States
Took a few days more than I inteded to finish Frankenstein, but boy howdy did I end up loving it. Easy 9/10, del Toro just doesn't miss with this gothic stuff. Aside from the annoying way it looks with it being way overlit, I have basically no notes. I loved the gothic atmosphere, the grand drama and tragedy, all the performances are stellar but especially Oscar Isaac. This might honestly be the best performance I've seen of him, and that's high praise indeed. He hits the perfect note of an unhinged, socially maladjusted genius who leaves a trail of destruction in the wake of his ambition. It's a great example of a character being unlikeable, but compelling and engaging. Mia Goth is a perfect foil to him. Jacob Elordi does a great job to make the creature sympathetic and engaging to watch, and his monstrous height (1,96 cm) is used to its full advantage: he just towers over everything in the frame. The sets and costuming look great, the score is great, the cinematography is great, there's not a single weak link in the production. As others have already pointed out, it's very old school and classical in its presentation: the story doesn't feel like it's been modernized in any way. It doesn't really need to, the themes are universal and timeless.

I'm kind of mixed about the creature's look in this: on one hand I like it early on when he almost looks like a freakish baby or an alien creature. But on the other hand a creature stitched together from carcasses should look at least a little grotesque, this one's just got a glowy eye and freaky skin. He could be on the cover of a monster romance novel, and it just feels weird. Beyond that and the lighting issue, this is top tier stuff through and through.
To be fair, the creature looking grotesque is completely an adaptation addition. The book specifies that the issue with the Creature visually is not that he actively looks grotesque, it's that once he starts moving and talking, he becomes basically a living version of the uncanny valley. That's a lot harder to show visually than it is to describe, so most adaptations just take the "looks like a monster" route.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
21,007
5,903
118
I'm kind of mixed about the creature's look in this: on one hand I like it early on when he almost looks like a freakish baby or an alien creature. But on the other hand a creature stitched together from carcasses should look at least a little grotesque, this one's just got a glowy eye and freaky skin. He could be on the cover of a monster romance novel, and it just feels weird. Beyond that and the lighting issue, this is top tier stuff through and through.
I don't know if this was done intentionally, but his initial appearance makes him look like a literal blank slate, heightend by the segmented parts bearing a striking resemblance to a paint-by-numbers kit.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,369
4,211
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,369
4,211
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
7,412
6,566
118
Australia
Predator: Badlands - 9/10

This was an idea that I looked at on paper and thought “I dunno about this” but I got a free ticket and went with some family. So funny story: it’s actually pretty kickass.

So the broad plot is Dek - the runt of a litter basically - wants to prove himself to his asshole dad, as you do, but his older brother Kwei was ordered to kill him but when dad really makes a federal case out of it, Kwei says “That’s a no from me dawg”. So a bit of kin slaying later, Dek finds himself on the planet Genna hunting its apex predator. A creature called the Kalisk, that even dear old dad thinks is too tough to kill. Also you know that meme about Australia being a death trap of a country where even the trees will kill you? Genna is that joke except most of the flora also have a rudimentary intelligence of their own. We’re talking vines that act as snakes, plants that explode, plants that explode AND fire poison darts - which the local dragons exploit by herding prey into the fields and dropping rocks to trigger the plants - and a kind of grass that is literally made of naturally grown glass.

At first it seemed like we’d be getting a low dialogue, body language acting solo film - which would also have been very cool - when our second major character Thia (Elle Fanning) pops up. Thia is a Weyland Yutani synth who I can best describe as C-3PO if her job was science but was programmed with the personality of Leeloo from 5th Element. I don’t know which degenerate at WY’s synth division thinks this a good idea but they are loved and hated in equal measure by their colleagues I’m sure. That 3PO comparison isn’t entirely factious either, the middle section of the movie is essentially Dek carrying Thia like Cheewie carried 3PO in ESB cos hey, WY are here for kalisk too and Thia lost her legs when they found it.

Now if you’ve ever seen a mismatched buddy cop/criminal sort of story you can probably reliably predict the trajectory of the rest of them film, especially when the third character, Bud, groups up with them. What works though is that each character does have their own distinct voice; Dek plays the Predator space orc thing pretty straight and never really wavers from that tone, Thia is as I described and Bud is, well, the cute one.

But gosh darn it; it’s still such a fun movie and hey, first time on screen I’ve seen the Yautja go up against The Company without the involvement of the Xenomorph. And the brief but effective scenes on the Yautja homeworld are really well done.

Also, after the end of the movie goes exactly but satisfyingly like you expect it to, a big ass spaceship is bearing down on our intrepid group of shitheads and Thia asks if they’re friends of Dek, he says “No. It’s my mother” and fuck me if that just wasn’t a hilarious note to truly end on. Also, and this is a bit of a deep lore cut, but Dek has a missing mandible, I’m wondering if some nerd in the writing team is trying to turn this into an origin movie for Broken Tusk from the OG AvP comics
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,076
4,777
118
After the Hunt

Luca Guadagnino's take on #MeToo, about a group of insufferable academics (mainly Julia Roberts as a philosophy professor, Andrew Garfield as her colleague, Ayo Edebiri as their student) who keep leveling accusations against each other. The title recalls a much better movie, The Hunt. Here the nature of the allegations is a little too hazy at times, but it's clear from the start that everybody's hiding something, so I watched the thing knowing I was meant to be prejudiced against everyone for (probably) the wrong reasons, and with that in mind my interest never really piqued. Takes too long to make a point and when it does it goes out of its way to muddle it.

Loose thoughts:

Julia Roberts is dressed and styled so uncannily like Cate Blanchett I have to assume the part was inspired by Tár and probably offered to her first. At times I kept forgetting that wasn't Blanchett.

I feel like this isn't the first time Garfield adopts an incel channer persona but I can't remember where else would I have seen the schtick?

Poor Michael Stuhlbarg really is typecast as an afterthought husband.

It didn't escape me that the credits are set to the Woody Allen font.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Bartholen

At age 6 I was born without a face
Legacy
Jul 1, 2020
1,000
1,050
118
Country
Finland
Total Recall (1990), 7/10

This is the Paul Verhoeven classic about a man in a cyberpunk future wanting to have an implanted memory of a vacation on Mars. Things go awry when he discovers that he's actually a secret agent whose real memories have been suppressed, and a whole lot of whiz bang action ensues. The film's full of iconic scenes: the three-breasted woman, tons of quippy one-liners, Arnie going "eugheahhegheuhgeuagh", and being a visual effects blowout and pioneer in a lot of ways.

I enjoyed it, but I felt it was kind of getting in its own way a lot of the time. There's a whole lot to appreciate: all the effects are stunning. This is probably the best-looking film done mostly with traditional effects I've seen, the compositing, matte paintings, miniatures and prosthetics look absolutely stellar. There's some really fun scenes where the perception of reality comes into question, and tons of really fun and showy action. Verhoeven goes all out with the carnage as glass shatters, sets get destroyed with abandon and those delicious Robocop-style blood squibs galore.

However, all of the action and effects spectacle felt kind of secondary to me. Easily the most interesting parts of the movie were the ones where the main character's identity is messed with, and the audience's perception of the film's reality gets questioned. The initial Bourne Identity-style mystery is really well executed, and I always love a well done "down the rabbit hole" story. So whenever another chase scene or shootout started (which is very frequently) I felt kind of interrupted because I could have had a whole movie of just the intrigue. I haven't read the short story this is based on, but I think I'd like this premise way more as a spy thriller than an over the top action movie, which it was apparently changed to during scripting. Don't get me wrong: it's a really fun over the top action movie. But the premise and first act set up a much more layered and complex movie than it ends up being. It's too much frosting and not enough cake. Apparently the 2012 version with Colin Farrell didn't do things very differently either, so I think the best version of this story is still yet to be made.

I also had another one of my bad movie nights, featuring:

War of the Worlds (2025), 3/10

This is this year's biggest "so bad it's good" movie, and watching it drunk with friends was a whole barrel of fun. It's the classic story in a similar format to the 1930s broadcast, but reinvented for the 21st century: in the original it was from the POV of a radio broadcaster, here it's an NSA surveillance agent played by Ice Cube. The entire film is seen through computer screens, phone and drone cameras and news footage. This was due to Covid restrictions when this was shot, but that doesn't automatically make the premise completely worthless. I wouldn't say the movie wastes it, but because the script is dumb as a bag of rocks it turns it into unintended hilarity instead. There's constant, egregiously nonsensical technobabble being spouted and written on screen, the characters are ridiculous caricatures, the technical aspect is done completely atrociously, it's riddled with clichés of the most aggravating kind. Ice Cube provides some hilarious reaction GIFs with his performance and there's some genuinely jaw-dropping product placement (seriously, you are not ready for how this movie's climax plays out). It is consistently stupid and entertaining. Excellent "drunk with friends" entertainment.

The Star Wars Holiday Special, 2/10

This is the legendary, and legendarily bad TV special from 1978, making it the first official piece of Star Wars canon after the first movie. It was aired only once, but lived on through recorded VHS tapes, and to this day it has never had an official release aside from the animated segment as an easter egg on a 2011 blu-ray release. Good thing that some enterprising renegade remastered it in 1080p and put it on Youtube for everyone to see and suffer through for free, and it's been that way for 7 years. As a comment put it: "The only reason Disney hasn’t copyright struck this is because that would require admitting they own it"

It lives up to its infamous reputation. It is bizarre, utterly misguided, baffling, dull as shit, dated beyond description and just an overall head-scratcher. The tissue-thin "plot", around which the various segments are organized, is about Chewbacca's family (betcha didn't know Chewie was an absent father and husband) in their house on "life day", which looks suspiciously like a 70s apartment on Christmas with some sci-fi decor. Then stuff just happens in a fashion I'm assuming was typical of TV variety specials of the time: guest stars and appearances, musical numbers, an animated segment featuring the first appearance of Boba Fett and some other stuff. I'm having a hard time recalling large chunks of it, because it is so scattershot in its structure that it's hard to keep up, especially if you're drunk. It's got plenty of hilariously awful production values and awkward acting. How Harrison Ford came back for Empire after being put in this is beyond me. But most of the time it's simply boring, so there's ultimately not very much to say. I am still going to say it's worth watching if you're into so bad it's good entertainment, if only because it's so infamous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
7,546
5,927
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Wicked: For Good: Okay, I Get It / Great

I begrudgingly saw the first movie, and while it didn't blow my mind, it left me with quite a few questions that I wanted to see resolution. This second one answered those questions quite satisfactorily. I can say they're [collectively] good movies now. Elphaba's arc is quite beautiful. I maintain that the songs are mostly protracted distractions, but the story they tell around all of the pageantry is a good enough one.

I can officially recommend the movies as a pair, i.e.: if you've not seen either, watch them back-to-back. That said, I don't know if the renown Broadway production already has done this. I imagine that must be the case, because if the first film is as far as the theater version went, there are a lot of disappointed people.

Lastly, The Wizard Of Oz is officially a bittersweet tragedy. You're welcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,076
4,777
118
Belén

Argentina's official submission to the next Academy Awards, based on the true story about a young woman charged with aggravated homicide after suffering a miscarriage in a public hospital in Tucumán. Tucumán, like so many other backwoods, is simultaneously God-starved and God-fearing.

The short of it is that you can be held without bail for two years in Argentina, at which point "Belén" (not her real name) was convicted in a rush to sweep all the judicial malfeasance under the rug. Then a bleeding heart lawyer caught wind of the story, realized all the different ways due process had been bent or disregarded, and went loud and public in an attempt to seek a retrial.

This was the casus belli that set off a chain of rallies and protests that years later culminated in the legalization of abortion in the country.

Like Argentina 1985 before it, it's a very Wikipedia-minded drama, with just enough comedic or suspenseful asides and poetic flourishes to pass it off as a movie. Its heart is in the right place, but it's very by the numbers Ikea filmmaking. The movie itself never feels bold or outraged, maybe cause it also doesn't have a strong central performance that gels everything together.
 

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,369
4,211
118
Country
United States
 

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,865
2,676
118
Country
United States
Some comfort viewing of totally predictable more-of-the-stuff-I-like sort:

The American Revolution
The latest Ken Burns doc series, where Ken Burns really Ken Burnses it up. Weighty narration, quotes from famous dead people read solemnly by famous alive people, misty recreations of soldiers marching and women spinning wool, maps with red and blue arrows creeping slowly across the screen. This stuff is for me what Bob Ross or re-runs of Friends are for some people- just calming, zone-out comfort food. Ultimate dad TV, even having Paul Giamatti read the John Adams quotes because he played him in the miniseries of the same name.

Ballerina
John Chick. I was there for the violence and action and of course it delivered, with a lot more explosions and fire in the second half than I anticipated.
The only thing I didn't like was that it leaned in on the series' mythology which is something I never cared about or paid attention to. Yeah I watched all the Wick movies but I dunno why there's a cult (I mean, a cult is supposed to worship or believe something and these dufus were just some assholes living in a village?), or why hired bodyguards are supposed also be ballet dancers, or what the hotel people get out of protecting anybody. With the Wick movies it didn't matter 'cause Johnny boy would just pop in, grunt speak or murder folks, then move on to the next set piece.

But none of that matters- at one point this chick jump-grapples a sucker while attaching a grenade to his neck and explodes him on top of an up-turned table and he gutsplodes so whatevs.
I did appreciate how much she got her ass kicked and that the movie lampshades how silly it is that a tiny girl is going to mass murder a bunch of armed large dudes, which it made it even sillier when she actually does that. Dunno how to feel about putting in Keanu to show us that no matter what he's still the best, it's weird in a movie when he's not the main character.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
10,984
7,945
118
I freely admitted in my review of Weapons that I felt I may not have "gotten" it, but after this HIGHLY informative watch... I get it now. Very powerful allegorical storytelling. I think it perhaps subverts itself by being a bit too obtuse with its intended messaging, offering too many avenues to distract and engage the imagination, but this was obviously (well, obviously now) a labor of personal expression, much like music, where the artist's message won't reach everyone, and may easily mean something entirely different to each individual. That said, it hits completely differently when you get the intent.
We can draw a distinction between about inspirations behind a work of art, and a message in that work of art. I would argue that this line of thinking is a risk of us potentially trying to insert a message that doesn't exist, or too much meaning. Knowing the director's background experience of family alcoholism can be satisfying to help understand the creative decisions made, but it doesn't necessarily mean the director ever wanted us to think about alcoholism. Maybe it is just a film about an evil old woman who inserts herself into a community.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,369
4,211
118
Country
United States
We can draw a distinction between about inspirations behind a work of art, and a message in that work of art. I would argue that this line of thinking is a risk of us potentially trying to insert a message that doesn't exist, or too much meaning. Knowing the director's background experience of family alcoholism can be satisfying to help understand the creative decisions made, but it doesn't necessarily mean the director ever wanted us to think about alcoholism. Maybe it is just a film about an evil old woman who inserts herself into a community.
TBF, the director has said that at the very least, he directly drew on his experiences to portray the situation with Alex and his parents, so it wasn't accidental. Now, he has denied any conscious attempts at commentary on school shootings/violence.

As for that last sentence, that reminds me of something Stephen King said, where he said he doesn't write themes, he writes stories. The problem with that is as he has said happened with Misery and The Tommyknockers, even if you don't intentionally write in themes, your subconscious has a funny way of sneaking out into your writing. Even if people don't intentionally sit down saying "I'm going to write a story about this, but it's really about that", "that" can end up in your work without you noticing until you are done.
 

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
10,984
7,945
118
TBF, the director has said that at the very least, he directly drew on his experiences to portray the situation with Alex and his parents, so it wasn't accidental.
It's not about accident. In my mind the average good artist will draw on their experiences to inform their art - often I suspect subconsciously it not consciously. But again, that's not the same as saying the meaning of the work being about the experience that helped bring it to fruition. For instance, a director might read about Emiliano Zapata and be inspired to create a similar character in his movie. But it doesn't mean the movie has to have any kind of anticapitalist parable.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
7,546
5,927
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The Longest Yard (2005): Good / Great

A remake of the 1974 classic of the same name, Adam Sandler plays a disgraced professional quarterback who, after being banned from the league for shaving points, has a breakdown that lands him in prison. The corrupt prison warden conscripts him to put together a football team of inmates to play against the prison guards in an exhibition game with the tacit understanding that the inmates are intended to lose.

As a fan of football, and this movie being considered such a classic in the genre of sports movies, I am surprised I hadn't seen it. For the life of me, I swore I had, but it wasn't 10 minutes into the film when I acknowledged that I'd never seen it. It was good, pretty funny, and star studded like nobody's business. Might have to watch the 1974 original to see how it compares, but for now, I'm happy with this one mostly because I can stop pretending I simply "forgot" the myriad references to the movie that my fellow sports enthusiasts use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
4,369
4,211
118
Country
United States
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan